Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
MasterP said:
Or gets worse, then never gets better.Or gets better, and all the republicans die of heart attacks, making the world a better place. hooorraayyy
😆 Okay I agree that families who don’t qualify for free lunches shouldn’t get the free hand outs. But I don’t agree with letting the kids starve. It’s not their fault their parents are losers. It’s not their fault they don’t have lunch money to pay for lunch. You all are also right, on the fact that beggars can’t be choosers. And the lady who wrote the article got it wrong, cheese sandwiches are not served cold, the majority of schools heat them up.
But just to argue for the sake of arguing, I think something needs to be done. I don’t agree with not feeding a kid if they don’t have any money. That is the very wrong way to go. Sure, it might work for a kid who misses out on 1 or 2 payments, but when a kid never has the money, because his parents don’t care about him, that will lead him down a bad path. I knew a lot of kids growing up who depended on the school systems breakfast and lunch, it was the only source of nutrition they got. Depriving them of intake automatically sets him up for failure. And malnutrition is just the surface of the issues this creates. The only options a kid has in this situation, would be either to starve, steal, bully, or join a gang. Kids aren’t just going to take the fact that they are poor. Their minds are still immature and growing, what they need is something to depend on. Those parents may complain about the cheese sandwiches, but cheese sandwiches are what’s keeping those kids off the streets. Fo real.
I think schools should be allowed to use left overs. If you have ever been in the back of the cafeteria, or any restaurant for that matter, you’d be amazed at how much good food is just thrown away on a daily basis. The schools want an answer to their lunch financial problems? the answer is in the delicious smorgasbord they call trash. Set aside an extra lunch period, and feed the kids left overs.
this can be easily solved. On mondays wednesdays and fridays, feed the kids cheese sandwitches. On tuesdays and thursdays, give them peanut butter sandwitches, with jelly packets for 10 cents. This is how my school did it, and all the kids loved it. I use to buy their cheese sandwitches, gave them 50 cents for it, and they would go spend it in the vending machine. Who says free hand outs don’t help the economy. Cheese sandwitch trading was the *edited* back in the day, it paid for my powerade.
MasterP said:
When do I get mine?$2 trillion in savings over 10 years does not offset $1.5 trillion of extra spending this year alone.
not sure when he said exactly, he said you’d see the tax cuts on your paycheck by April tho. 2 trillion over ten years doesn’t offset 1.5 trillion. But finding 200 billion dollars extra a year for the next 10 years is still pretty good. And he’s still working on his promise to cut 1.5 trillion in half.
MajorMajorMajor said:
you should still play with us sometime till D3 comes outare you guys gonna start out on Hardcore when that comes out? Play soft core! god can’t *edited* with you then.
MajorMajorMajor said:
YAY BIRTHDAYjeez… every1 has birthdays these days… do i smell massive orgy in my pants?
thats actually what you were thinking wasn’t it Major
torankusu said:
whoa.
that blew my mind. That kid at the end was insane, he will never have to use a calculator in his life.
MasterP said:
I assume the new one is a SATA. Don’t have enough info to determine the other one. SATA doesn’t have a master and slave, it goes solely on the port you are using. SATA0 > SATA1 > SATA2, etc when it comes to drive lettering and booting unless you specify otherwise in BIOS.SATA is almost almost prioritized and lettered before IDE.
yeah they are both SATA’s
I made sure to plug in the new one in SATA0, its working smooth, and now I have more memory than I probaby need. Thanks all for the help
okay new question that I’m sure seems obvious to some but causes me migranes. Now that I have this new hard drive. How do I make the old one a slave? People keep telling me to flip some switches on the hard drive, or something. I have taken the old one out and am looking at it, I see nothing that even look slike a switch.
GOOD LUCK!!! YOU’LL NEED IT!
If you’ve never played Super Smash TV, you don’t deserve to be called a gamer. this is THE game of all time. We can all finally rest in peace.
For those who haven’t played or heard of the game, here’s a taste of what you missed out on.
NoDice said:
nuff said
:withstupid:
NBA JAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
torankusu said:
Ugh, I heard about that. It’s not funny; I’m not even sure why it’s in the Joke of the Day thread.Also, I read in ABC’s article that Xanax can be given to animals (you’d have to speak to a doctor about it or something, though), but it can cause maniacal behavior in unstable patients.
I think it’s stupid that people think they can raise them like children.
Yeah, what bothers me is the fact that a 70 lady can legally own a 200 pound chimpanzee.
I feel really bad now, the lady has no eyes or nose or lower jaw. the chimp ripped them out. X_x
All three of these games either are right up there with golden eye, or even surpass it.
Golden Axe
Killer Instinct GOLD
.jpg)
Michael Jordan: Chaos in the Windy City
this one is no joke, but funny as hell:
What they don’t tell you, is that the lady who owned the chimp gave him a Xanex 20 minutes before he flipped out. I feel bad for the ape tbh lol.
we ought to keep out all the political pokes, i mean jokes. Things could just get nasty =/
lol but that was pretty funny
last two jokes were hilarious.
To Ephraim: the rest of that first joke you sent, did not see that coming. lol my initial reaction was to laugh, but by laughing I got the joke, therefore I think I may be going to hell along with you Eph. rofl
For the Thread:
I walk into bathrooms both for relief and to keep up with the latest stall humor. Although it saddens me when all the radical christian groups blot out all the funny jokes, and replace them with bible quotes. There was a new one the other day, I found hilarious:
“Christ would NOT *edited* with bathroom stalls”
I couldn’t pick more than one, so I picked my favorite of your choices. the last
Everyone needs an a-hole <3
lol jk
torankusu said:
Now I’m curious… pm me. xPme too!!
i have no idea where your joke was going Ephraim, lemme in on the juice!
torankusu said:
LOL, WIN INDEED.I’m not going to post it cuz it’s really long, so here’s a link.
It’s… THE LONGEST JOKE IN THE WORLD.
Supposedly.
http://www.innocentenglish.com/best-funny-…-joke-ever.html
When I first read through it, my reaction was, “LOLWTF.” Everyone I’ve showed it to has had the same reaction. It’s really dumb, but I laffed.
Okay I was about to read it, but this Youtube video distracted me rofl.
Then he waddled away! waddle waddle
😆 MasterP said:
Does 2005 counts as years ago?
Besides, he’s not the only one that’s done an analysis on the tax system.
who else? Not trying to disprove you or anything, I just want to read up on them myself. I’m curious as to your sources; I wanna see what you would consider a good source on this issue. Since you chopped my last quote up like bbq pork.
then surely you must keep up with his website?
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/menu/top_…axes.guest.html
then again, all republicooks sound the same to me =/
Pink Monkey #16 said:
“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money to spend.” – Margaret ThatcherI have long ranted about the uneducated masses who vote for politicians in this country, and I will say I am tempted to follow Brian’s lead and require people to pay federal taxes before they can vote in federal elections. I personally would prefer that they have to pass and intelligence test or at least some sort of quiz on current events. (Like being able to name their representative, senator, maybe a cabinet member of their choice.) However, as tempting as this choice is, I cannot agree with it. Once you start down the road of placing requirements on voting, where do you stop? That takes us to a place where I don’t wish to go as a country.
Also, we have ranted many times about the tax code, but I think it really comes down to a fundamental principle: Who owns what? Does the government own you? Do they own your house? Do they own your money? Do you support the government, or do they allow you to keep some of your money?
I personally believe in private property. What I earn is mine. I can do with it whatever I wish. My income is not the government’s, I pay taxes, they don’t allow me to keep some of my income.
What do you all think? Who really owns what?
China doesn’t own Yao Ming anymore
regressive tax is doomed to fail. Rich can afford to pay more. As they should. Also rich can do this really effective thing called Lobbying. See, they can buy lobbyists, which do whatever it takes to get the targeted official to side with their client. Now I’m sure you will point out Obama and his contradiction on that issue (by making exceptions to a lobbyist to be in his cabinet), but my issue isn’t the lobbyist, but the ones who are able to afford lobbyist. AKA the RICH.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/busi…icle1995931.ece
Mr. Buffet seems to think so as well. Granted this is just another stunt by the Buffmaster to make more money, but I like this article because it points out some of the obvious:
Republicans want to make up for revenue by taxing the poor.
Rich people can afford the “heavy” tax burden, because they have more ways to avoid portions of it.
It would cause the rift between rich and poor to grow larger than it already is.
“You could take that $30 billion and give $1,000 to 30 million poor families, or should you favour the 12,000 estates and make 30 million family pay an extra $1,000?,” he said.
now why on earth would we want to do that? Seeing how as you all said, a percentage of low income families don’t pay federal taxes. It only makes sense to tax the rich more.
Boohoo that’s so mean of us to do, taking almost 50 percent of their moneys. We shouldn’t be mean to people who make billions. Cuz if we tax them, they will still have billions?? And will probably make a profit that year. While little old grandma in Low Income, United States, won’t get taxed as much, but still wont be able to afford anything close to what Mr. Billionaire has.
You guys always fail to figure in quality of life, and price of living. House + Car is almost 80 percent of a persons (who makes 100k or less) income. While Mr. Moneybags can afford to buy 10 houses, rent off 8, own a car company, and a few Yachts. Assets = another reason they are taxed more. More assets you have, the more they should pay for our governments services.
And as far as people who don’t pay taxes. Some people just can’t afford too. That doesn’t mean they are criminals, or evil people, that we should just toss them aside and not allow them to vote. Granted, there are some people who try and cheat the system, but there are many more who just have had some bad luck. And don’t say there is no such thing as bad fortune, because if a man can be born with a billion dollars to his name, than a man can be born with nothing, on the streets. And both men in my eyes, regardless of taxes, are citizens of the United States, and I’ll be damned if I ever let any republican try to take that away.
I’d rather give 1000 cheaters the benefit of our system, than punish 1 person who honestly just has had some bad luck and needs a helping hand.
lockEm said:
Going to chime in here from the competitive aspect of CS. I know a lot of awful players see saving your gun as a stat-*edited* move, but its nothing like that at all. Saving your gun, just means you’re not a retard like zoid commando or mira (<3 both) and ramboing a site against impossible odds. Meaning you have a gun for the next round increasing your chances to win and help you team.I coin the objectives or die thing more like “Try or die”. You don’t have to go Rambo into a site to try and defuse, but you have to at least try. If a player sits back the whole round, allows the other team to plant, and then doesn’t even try to defuse?? No matter how good one thinks they are, if they do that in a round, why would it be smart to let them save their gun for the next round; so they can do that sequence of sitting, camping, and not trying all over again?
I’m for “Try or Die!” all the way. No one likes to watch someone sit their and not try. In fact, I say we deploy a new form of objective or die slaying. I say we slay the culprit not only that round, but the following round, for causing us to waste our time watching the camp session. That way they can enjoy, with some popcorn if they want, a whole round dead watching everyone else play.
As for an auto-slay plug-in, i don’t think that would fly. =/
It definitely should be a manual feature. We can’t give any more power than we already have to the *edited* machines; they will kill us all!!! lol
dos pesos de mi
MasterP said:
Btw, why isn’t anyone blaming this on Bush? You’re missing out on a great opportunity here. Comeon.haha, I guess because Bush is already old news. It’s one of those defaults. You know, that one automatically equates to the problem without any actual mention. Like Parfait. You don’t mention the nuts, whipped creme, yogurt, and berries, you just assume it’s a Parfait. God I love Parfaits.
Now that I think about it, relating Bush to a Parfait, is just rude to Parfaits all across the world. If you ever had a bad parfait, with bad ingredients, Bush would be the reasons behind why those bad ingredients were bad in the first place. So if you had bad nuts, bush would be the lid some moron forgot to leave on to keep the nuts fresh. Or he would be the mold that caused the berries to be moldy. Or he would be the cow that created the bitter milk used to make bitter, sour, yogurt. rofl =P
MasterP said:
So you really think soldiers stationed in Afghanistan would sell weapons knowing they themselves would be shot at by them? That doesn’t make any sense.yeah I agree, with MasterP (rofl that rhymes)
It wasn’t our soldiers selling the guns, it was either the local people in transport, or the Afghanistani who we are training over their to eventually take over.
