Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
The biggest WTF moment in that game was when Carolina got the touchdown and had it reversed because the wrong player had the ball. Had it not been 4th down it wouldn’t have mattered and they’d have counted the touchdown.
That safety was win though.
I imagine they’ll release expansion packs that add aditional characters. I’m almost expecting Diablo3 to be Blizzard’s Guild Wars version of WoW with semi-frequent expansions.
Pink Monkey #13 said:
Ephraim said:
that reply is slightly comical in the context of this thread.
Oddly enough I had already thought the exact same thing.
So you going to ask before posting me on imageshack or ?
I mean really, are you trying to *edited* off or confuse everyone here?
Felix Nova said:
Getting mad at someone for rick rolling you on the Internets is a sign of you being a noob.
An experienced Internets user knows to check links before clicking them.
Also, BANG is the greatest ninja ever.
Domo I really don’t think you have a clue what was posted but in case you do, posting a link that hijacks your browser and forces you to use ctrl-alt-delete to close it will get you banned on 99% of forums. It’s not really a sign of weakness on our part, it’s a commonly understood “don’t post this unless you want to *edited* everyone off” sign on the posters part.
Be lucky I removed the link. Had Adambomb, Liam, or Raven clicked the link you’d likely have been banned without any warning.
YouWinGameOver said:
*edited* you.
Why won’t you respond? Because I am *edited*ing right?
I don’t respond because if you can’t even figure out how to use the quote button why the hell should I assume you’ve figured out how to form complete sentences and logic patterns.
YouWinGameOver said:
It is not a disease first off.
Notice I said I wasn’t touching that. I’ve proven before that it’s a moral disease, even had some libs agree that the argument made sense, but doing so here would take way too long and you’d fall off the bus halfway there so I’m not going to bother.
YouWinGameOver said:
It’s easy to tell because you are so *edited*ing afraid of them. You segregated them to the point where you can tell.
I don’t remember saying I was afraid of them. I avoid them if I can but I’m not afraid to talk to them. Since I’m not insecure I don’t really mind talking to them.
There’s a big difference between being afraid and avoiding. I would be afraid of going near opposing gang members arguing in the street but would avoid gang members regardless if at all possible. Doesn’t mean I won’t talk to gang members, and I had to a few times while working for Duke Energy, but that doesn’t mean I was afraid while doing so.
YouWinGameOver said:
I am not in a frat and I don’t go to keggars. So get off your hi horse and your computer take you nose out of the bible and really look at the world. You are being a pretentious *edited*.
Sorry. Every place I’ve ever worked at has frowned HEAVILY upon talking about “banging achievements” and other similar conversations. The real world simply does not tolerate that, especially not in an office environment, it’s simply too big of a sexual harasement case waiting to happen. I’ve worked in retail, public utility, and university. The only people I’ve ever heard talk about that were those in frats and those who frequented keggers, none of which worked or lived in the real world.
Where exactly do you work or discuss sexual achievements? I’m kinda curious at this point.
YouWinGameOver said:
Once again *edited* you. I have lost a lot of respect for you with in this thread alone. The fact that you feel the need to not respond to someone because they screwed up on something simple shows how hi you have put your *edited* on a pillar.
To be perfectly honest, I’m not in this for your respect. If you can’t take 30 seconds to fix a post how can you honestly expect me to spend 15 minutes responding? Is it fair that when you don’t spend the time to properly bash me that I don’t spend the time to properly reply?
Btw, anyone who takes a political-oriented thread personally needs a serious reality check. Take a giant step back and remember this is the internet. Continuously saying “*edited* you” just makes you look like the *edited* here.
YouWinGameOver said:
And another thing how is this upbringing and lifestyle when conservatives have *edited* kids. Did those kids not read the bible? Did their dad’s rape them? What was it that “changed” them to be *edited*…gave them that “choice” to be *edited*?
When did conservative mean good parenting? You can be a conservating and still never spend time with your kids. In fact you can even be conservative and NOT be a Christian. As comical as your stereotyping is, it’s really getting old.
Being “conservative” means you have a set of values. Not all those values have to fit into the “stereotypical conservative” set of values, simply that you’re close. You can be atheist and vote conservative. You can rape your kids and vote conservative. Again, you need to take a giant step back and look at the larger picture. No one has mentioned political parties or ideals up until now and it’d be a real shame if, instead of arguing the points, you dragged this back to the same-old republican vs democrat argument. That’s not what this thread is about.
I was listening to it driving back to the apartment and I’m like “wtf? jake delhomme for a first down? delhomme doesn’t run, he’s a *edited*.”
But yeah, anytime Delhomme personally runs it 8 yards for a first down the opposing team needs to uninstall.
Dude, if you’re going to bash me at least learn how to use the quote button. If you can get it right (not hard btw it just takes a brain) I’ll reply, otherwise I’ll ignore and move on.
NuRayZ said:
a choice would be whether i want chocolate or vanilla ice cream. I don’t choose to have relations with women, I am attracted to them. Tell me, if it’s a choice, what could possibly be causing them to choose that? The devil? lol
but wait, lets back up a little. There is evidence of homosexual behavior in animals. Sure they can’t reproduce, and therefore should die off, and do. But then the following generation those blasted homos are back! but how? Now, are you telling me then that they are choosing to do that? So now ‘ultra-conservatives’ would be conceding to the fact that animals have consciousness?!?! That totally goes against the conservative way rofl
just thought it kinda funny, of course animal behavior is not rational but instinctive. Could it be that is where it comes from, that some people’s instincts tell them their *edited*? hmm..maybe. I guess the question arises is whether or not you believe we are born with instincts or a clean slate. Oh how fun that lecture was in philosophy class!
The fact that it happens in nature does raise questions but the *edited* population in nature isn’t nearly as high as that of humans.
Regardless, I think it’s simply the lifestyle and upbringing that causes it. I mean it’s easy to say it’s genetic but now they’re saying that people can be genetically predisposed to be alcoholics, drug addicts, and criminals. Comeon, I can be born to be a car thief that does crystal meth? Let’s put the blame where it really belongs.
Poor or unbalanced upbringing can cause a myriad of mental and psychological disorders and although it would take longer to find the link, I think it would be better to use something that makes sense as a reason for it instead of “hey they were born *edited* and even though I can’t prove it your argument is invalid.” Like you said, they haven’t found the “*edited* gene” yet but everyone is so *edited* sure it exists. If it was truely genetic and deterimental to a species’ long-term survival, and not reproducing is a pretty big detriment, then the population should extinct itself. If not, then it’s not genetic. I don’t know what it is but if it’s not genetic you can’t be predisposed to be it.
YouWinGameOver said:
This is where the uber conservatives don’t understand. What makes it a choice for you to enjoy women? Did you say “Wow I think I am going to eat *edited* today.” No, you didn’t.
Well let’s put this in Darwin liberal terms then. How does a species reproduce? It’s not male-male, it’s male-female. If *edited*s don’t reproduce eventually that “genetic abnormality” will extinct itself and we’ll be back to status-quo as nature intended. IF however it’s not genetic and truely is a choice, as us “ultra-conservatives” believe, then regardless of how much homosexuals don’t reproduce they’ll always be more of them. According to genetics and nature, this is not possible. Unless homosexuality is a disease and I’m not going that route.
YouWinGameOver said:
Most *edited*s don’t flaunt their homosexuality because they are oppressed.
Why then? Why is that when you walk down the street you can always tell who’s *edited* and who isn’t. I know my *edited*dar is tuned to “stay the hell away” mode but it’s not like they aren’t making it easy to tell.
YouWinGameOver said:
Most men and women for that matter run around talking their asses off about who they *edited*ed at parties the night before. This may not be your cup of tea talking about who you got with but most do.
When you get out of the frat house and quit going to keggers you’ll find most of the world doesn’t care who you banged last night.
NuRayZ said:
Unlike a *edited* guy, a woman is genetically different than a man.
Last I checked the running liberal excuse for being *edited* was that they were genetically predisposed to be that way. This would make them genetically different from straight men, just like women.
You can’t use both sides of the argument here.
The military is made of primarily heterosexual males and until we have true equality of carrying the burden (IE women and *edited*s NOT being exempt from the draft) I have no problem bashing others or pushing them to secondary roles. Keep in mind that removing homosexuality as a draft dodger will put millions of you liberals back in the draft pool if/when we ever do have another draft. IMO you’d be better off not having “equality”.
I have nothing against *edited*s, it’s a choice they make, but straights don’t flaunt their heterosexuality in the military so why should they tolerate *edited*s flaunting their homosexuality. I mean really, the military is a choice, you don’t HAVE to be there.
Btw, the whole “can’t have a picture” thing is nonsense. Give me one source that backs that up with proof a soldier was actually punished for having a picture of a male.
The military isn’t about sexuality, it’s about creating cookie-cutter soldiers. The second you allow sexuality or sexual preference to enter into the equation you instantly create differences between soldiers that no amount of training can compensate for.
If you REALLY care about serving, and that’s the sole reason you’re there, why does it matter that you can’t be openly *edited*. All they want to do is prove a point or show the world they’re *edited*, those making a big deal over this have no interest in serving this country. Being a soldier is a secondary concern to forcing their sexual choices and ideals on the rest of us.
Also does it include any hardware additions like a modem/broadband adapter, gameboy player, or any mod chips or softmods.
NuRayZ said:
Cops mistakenly shoot homeowner 6 times in the back after he calls 911 to report a home invasion. The cops are recorded on the 911 audio trying to cover it up, oblivious to their own demise. The homeowner survived and is now suing for 5.75 million dollars.
A cop could break into your house, steal your TV, and then shoot you when you attempt to stop him and still be found completely innocent of any wrong doing. It’s a shame but that’s just how invulnerable they are.
Best to just not get them involved until all the shootings done.
Raven said:
To be perfectly honest, the extra buttons on the G11 don’t appeal to me. I don’t see myself having any use for them.
Then don’t use them.
I don’t. Never have.
I bought it because it’s extremely easy to type on, has media keys, and every key is backlit.
Raven said:
MasterP said:
G11.
Read original post. G11 = Huge, and requires drivers/extra software to enable additional features.
G11.
Btw it runs fine on stock Win7 drivers.
If you want to pay $70 for a POS with no features then by all means but you’re better off paying the money and getting a nice keyboard for it.
I think we should remove spam posts from his post count. Lower it down to something a little more realistic, say 30, 40 posts?
marLey` said:
MasterP said:
Alltalk voting is a bad idea and, as recently complained about, doesn’t work in Source.
You have the option to custom vote and the option to turn alltalk on. Maybe allow admins to turn alltalk on and off and make them put up a custom vote before doing it. Idk how AMX works so that may not even be possible.
I try to never relate people that play source with people that play 1.sex… two very different communities imo. (btw toru i stared at your 1.sex for like 2 minutes before i got that u meant 1.6 haha….i was just like wtf why did she just say sex…)
Please stop trolling me. I’m not going to feed you.
If this game makes it to a LAN and CS/CSS doesn’t I will quit the club.
And take as many people with me as I can.
I’m totally serial.
