Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
You really want me to do your own research? Spend a few hours googling around, you’ll find it’s about as “scientific” as global warming.
By your logic, if you are taught evolution but have the right to not believe it then it should also be fair to teach creationism. Hey no one said you HAVE to believe it…
NuRayZ said:
MasterP said:
There are just as many holes in evolution as there are in creationism. The difference? Those who believe in evolution have a power base in politics while those who believe in creationism have a base in religious sects. Since the political elite have pushed all aspect of religion out of government, guess which one won? Neither is a perfect account for how we got here and I find it incredibly shortsighted for you libs to bash one and not the other.
You know what else the difference is? One is based off of science, and the other is attempting to take science out of the equation. Personally I think it’s a little bit of both. Chaos theory just doesn’t fly for me, something definitely started life up, the course which it is on, however is definitely on a learning, or evolutionary process.
“Based off science” but not proved by it. I see you missed that point entirely, probably because it shoots a gaping hole through your arguement.
NuRayZ said:
The real question is, if you believe homosexuality is a choice, what do you do if your own kid was *edited*? Either you love him, or you reject him. Feelings aside, would you want him to grow up being honest with himself? Or would you want him to grow up like the numerous homosexual hypocrites walking around washington?You always love your children, regardless of whether or not you agree with their decisions in life. That can be said about almost every decision a child makes, barring only the most extremes like becoming a drug addict or pedobear.
YouWinGameOver said:
MasterP said:
Since homosexuality is now considered genetic (i lol’d btw) let’s find the gene that causes it and start telling parents before birth that their child will be *edited*. If parents started aborting future-*edited*s en-mass there would be a massive political outcry, and there should be, but it’s no more unfair to abort a *edited* than it is to abort anyone else. That’s not how it would go down though.
Where does it say that being *edited* is genetic. And do you still honestly believe that you have the choice? Like I asked you before did you get up this morning and say I think I’ll take a *edited* in my *edited* today? Yeah, that will be fun?
We’ll if it’s not genetic and it’s not a choice…
There isn’t a magical *edited* fairy that flies around and casts the Homosexual Level 3 spell on people. That spell must be bought from Adria on the outskirts of town.
NuRayZ said:
In 2006 running for Governor, Palin agrued for Creationism in the class room as an “alternative” to evolution. that IS retarded, stupid, not intelligent. Creationism should be classified and taught as part of a religious philosophy course, NOT in science. That’s just one reason why i think Palin is retarded.
There are just as many holes in evolution as there are in creationism. The difference? Those who believe in evolution have a power base in politics while those who believe in creationism have a base in religious sects. Since the political elite have pushed all aspect of religion out of government, guess which one won? Neither is a perfect account for how we got here and I find it incredibly shortsighted for you libs to bash one and not the other.
NuRayZ said:
Pro Life vs. Pro Choice. It’s tough. Potential lives that could change the world are destroyed. I’m all for women’s rights, but I also think there should be some reform on the rules and laws pertaining to abortion. Things like fetus development in respect to the abortion should be more restrictive. Maybe restrict the amount of abortions. You only get a certain amount. Most women who get abortions probably learn, but this would help the rest of the thick headed nymphos out there to finally get it.
Regardless of what side you’re on, you have to agree (because science says so) that there is a living object inside the womb. Now we can sit here and debate all day over what constitutes it as being “human” but it is a living, oxygen-consuming creature. What gives us the right to prevent that creature from being born? Why is it that dogs are treated with more respect and dignity when they’re put down than developing human beings?
Here’s an instant way to reverse all the abortion laws:
Since homosexuality is now considered genetic (i lol’d btw) let’s find the gene that causes it and start telling parents before birth that their child will be *edited*. If parents started aborting future-*edited*s en-mass there would be a massive political outcry, and there should be, but it’s no more unfair to abort a *edited* than it is to abort anyone else. That’s not how it would go down though.
By your logic then, being able to read speeches off a teleprompter does not make Obama intelligent. Nor does it make him a good leader.
When Obama gives a speech without any notes or teleprompting, then you have a right to bash others.
Obama can’t even give a speech to elementary school kids without a teleprompter and you guys get bent out of shape because she wrote a few words on a hand? This wreaks of legendary-grade double standard and you guys are too stupid to realize it.
She’s one of the few politicians that has ever worked an honest, normal-American job and all you guys do is bash her. I sure hope you don’t think the government isn’t in touch with the average American because if you do and put even a shred of thought into it you’d realize that you are part of the cause of the disjunct.
Nickname said:
MasterP said:
It’s the superbowl. Always expect an onsides kick.
this was the first time in superbowl history to have an onside kick not in the 4th quarter….
Didn’t watch but yeah if it isn’t in the 4th quarter it usually isn’t worth the risk.
I was able to get it working and had 3 consecutive versus matches join in my test console. I have implemented the changes on server #2 and as soon as the tards in #1 are done with their campaign I’ll do it there as well.
That’s assuming I can. L4D/L4D2 servers are so *edited* temperamental there’s no telling if it’ll even let me lock it.
We could always raise the price of an AWP to 16k. That way if they go AWP they have severe limitations on what else they can do.
Rocket Rob said:
Ripc_Scarolina said:
16k every round made me leave… now its like every other server out there… Its retarded…
ummm you used the R word!
ragequit?
The systemboard is a large, $400 circuit board that won’t be getting replaced once you’re out of warranty.
It doesn’t matter that the problem isn’t major, they always start off small.
Like I said, assemble 14 Degrees East and you’ve got Star Trek space battles that never get old. Anything else is like Bridge Commander or Starfleet Academy Vol 2/3. They’re fun at first but take WAY too long and get old fast.
No demo = no success
Seriously, Star Trek hasn’t had a solid flight-sim since Klingon Academy and I seriously doubt this comes close to how good it could have been with a decent development team. They should have reassembled the old 14 Degrees East team, that would have given this game an epic space sim aspect.
inb4 this game flops, hard
It’s been in IT’s storage room for over a month.
All we need is for someone to go “talk to them about it”. IE: go tell Keith they’re refusing to plug it up.
Once the new box is in place I can set up multiple servers with multiple map cycles to see what catches on best.
