Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
NuRayZ said:
MasterP said:
I’m loving the double standard. When a newspaper criticized Obama and provided evidence to back it up they were kicked off his airplane, when a TV station makes Palin look stupid on national television it’s considered hilarious.
So now we have to hold a VP canidate(BTW NO PLANE FOR HER LOLOL; SHE LOST) who actively agreed to be interviewed, AND refused to prepare, to the same standards as the president who kicked newspapers off his plane for a reason I don’t care about because it’s HIS (temporary) plane? lol?
He did it when he was still a candidate.
So yeah, let’s hold candidates from both parties to the same standards, shall we? McCain didn’t kick anyone off his plane, including the vast array of newspapers that officially endorsed his competitor.
And yes, neither set of candidates in the last running were any good. It should have been Hillary versus Thompson.
lawlrence said:
That’s all very nice, but you didn’t touch on my question at all.
Could you be more specific?
I mean I could pull your politic affiliation from voter records, analyze your posts from this section, and make a vast array of educated guesses about your various “positions” but tbh I’d prefer spend 3 hours doing something else.
Fuse said:
Liquid said:
Kirby is going to get lazered and gyroed to death tomorrow, lol.
After taking 10 mins of time 2 actually read how people thing ssbb should be played i found out… all the guys u play with blow *edited* and will be destroyed in a terrible manner tommorrow while someone behind u yells rape like a goat for 30 mins till u go slightly insane in the head and forget how to troll a forum correctly
I think you underestimate how retardedly lame some of these guys play the game.
lawlrence said:
Care to elaborate on what my position is and how that hurts it? Last two times you’ve guessed on my position you’ve been wrong.
You came up with that article and quoted from it, not me. I got the facts of the poll from a different source.
Commentary by the pollsters is typically used to try to explain why they didn’t get the results they wanted.
Liquid said:
Anti-Kazka was in fact a contributing member of the forums before the crash. He is not a spammer or a troll; he made that username because it’s a nickname of his. I see no legitimate reason to ban him or force a name change. Let’s not get bureaucracy in the way of our happy community.
Arguments that make sense, like that one, get you SO much further than a troll post.
The ban or account delete wasn’t going to happen because, like you said, he was a solid member.
Is his current name/title an acceptable middleground?
Ok so let’s focus on what you’ve posted.
lawlrence said:
“A generation ago you would have expected Americans to place their trust in the most neutral and unbiased conveyors of news,” said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. “But the media landscape has really changed and now they’re turning more toward the outlets that tell them what they want to hear.”
In the context of the article you posted, this statement applies to democrats just as much as republicans. It is a general bash to say that democrats trust MSNBC and republicans trust Fox. This generic flame negates your argument as it both helps and hurts your position equally, leaving you back in the same position from which you started.
GG next?
nako AKA anti kaz-ka said:
MasterP said:
Who told you to make an anti-kazka account?
90% of the people in the CL and kaz-ka himself… though i think he said nu kaz-ka. lol
Just an FYI, all duplicate and anti- accounts were to be deleted on sight after the last time they were spam created.
Kazka was told and acknowledged this. Why he would tell you to break a rule he knew would get your account deleted is, well…
lawlrence said:
The results of the other questions in that poll make it seem a little biased.
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_National_126.pdf.
Also this made me lol,
“A generation ago you would have expected Americans to place their trust in the most neutral and unbiased conveyors of news,” said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. “But the media landscape has really changed and now they’re turning more toward the outlets that tell them what they want to hear.”
That link is broken btw…
I like how when polls are in favor of a republican or right-leaning ideal the poll is biased in some way or the people are too stupid to realize they’re wrong yet when a democrat or left-leaning ideal is favored by a poll it’s always considered 100% on the mark. Go look at “reviews” of polls, you’ll see that trend occurs most of the time.
NuRayZ said:
Thanks MP, I did realize that they were biassed but biassed news media destroying and “surprising” a public figure running for the second highest seat in the land is still hilarious
Especially when it’s a public figure like sarah palin who takes pride with commentsI’m loving the double standard. When a newspaper criticized Obama and provided evidence to back it up they were kicked off his airplane, when a TV station makes Palin look stupid on national television it’s considered hilarious.
Nickname said:
MasterP said:
Not everyone, just most of the ones on TV.
They are financially invested in the democrat party and will do their part in making the masses think any opposing group is retarded and racist/bigots. Granted Fox is the same way but 1 station is a far cry from the 5 with heavy liberal leanings, dispite the fact that Fox has the highest percentage of trust and lowest percentage of distrust of all the major stations. And the largest audience. And the only one to have a net gain of viewer trust in 2009.
Fox news is like the joke of the news industry, you know that right?
You do realize that Fox has more viewers than their top 3 competitor channels combined, right? Call it a joke all you want, they’re doing something right and if they lied about the news people wouldn’t watch.
I mean if they’re such a joke why do 49% of Americans trust them compared with CNN’s 39%. I won’t even waste my time looking up ABC/CBS/NBC/MSNBC’s trust ratings…
Not everyone, just most of the ones on TV.
They are financially invested in the democrat party and will do their part in making the masses think any opposing group is retarded and racist/bigots. Granted Fox is the same way but 1 station is a far cry from the 5 with heavy liberal leanings, dispite the fact that Fox has the highest percentage of trust and lowest percentage of distrust of all the major stations. And the largest audience. And the only one to have a net gain of viewer trust in 2009.
lawlrence said:
MasterP said:
Nice NuRayz, you figured out the ABC and CBS love asking vague questions and making republicans look stupid.
I would say I’m not surprised but I figured you wouldn’t have figured that out.
The only vague question that stood out to me in that clip was the Bush doctrine one. She says a lot of stupid things, period. Does this mean that all republicans are stupid? No. Does this mean that there aren’t equally stupid democrats? No. However, if you can’t admit her ineptitude at answering questions on her feet then you’re clearly biased. Also ABC and CBS are no where near as biased as Fox.
She also said alot of very smart things too. You won’t find any sort of balance or unbiased representation from a TPM video. Their own website states they’re left wing.
I mean if you want I can find a video of Obama making a complete idiot out of himself, sometimes even with a teleprompter, but that wouldn’t change your opinion that Palin is retarded and Obama is a genius on roids.
Nice NuRayz, you figured out the ABC and CBS love asking vague questions and making republicans look stupid.
I would say I’m not surprised but I figured you wouldn’t have figured that out.
Liam said:
and here I thought the ram was horrigood. Don’t be hating. The ram has really good CAS latency and had excellent reviews from a number of sources.
I think he means that PC2200 is just above 266 MHz DDR1.
NuRayZ said:
Now back to Palin. Robert Gibbs made fun of her by reenacting the whole peeking at the hand notes thing. It’s funny except for the fact that it’s the Presidents Press Secretary doing the jabbing. I want to hear statuses and updates not jokes from the WHPS.
All he’s done since day 1 is bash Fox News, make fun of republicans, downplay serious issues as not important, and flat out lie about what’s going on behind the scenes.
I miss the days of Tony Snow, where questions were answered with real answers, serious issues were discussed openly or told they were being delt with (IE be blunt not cryptic), and the jokes made were in a format so that everyone in the room laughed, not just libs or republicans.
Bitey said:
MasterP said:
If you think reg is good now, oh boy have we got a surprise for you…
This is quite possibly the most perverted thing you have ever said.
I’m almost positive I’ve said worse to/about/regarding Kalia at one point or another.
Oh I’m sure it won’t.
Not at first anyway.
Btw, we’re still waiting for Patrick to put the correct OS on it. He said he’d do it yesterday morning.
YouWinGameOver said:
MasterP said:
You really want me to do your own research? Spend a few hours googling around, you’ll find it’s about as “scientific” as global warming.
By your logic, if you are taught evolution but have the right to not believe it then it should also be fair to teach creationism. Hey no one said you HAVE to believe it…
MasterP said:
My beliefs are similar to what Nickname stated.
I have my cake, I’ve feasted upon it, and all the while all the dots line up to form a pretty picture.
NuRayZ said:
MasterP said:
You really want me to do your own research? Spend a few hours googling around, you’ll find it’s about as “scientific” as global warming.
By your logic, if you are taught evolution but have the right to not believe it then it should also be fair to teach creationism. Hey no one said you HAVE to believe it…
While evolution hasn’t been proven, it isn’t simply based on faith and if it has so many holes why does the majority of the science community still accept it as the theory to which life has taken?
“the scientific community there is essentially universal agreement that the evidence of evolution is overwhelming, and the scientific consensus supporting the modern evolutionary synthesis is nearly absolute.”
# ^ Delgado, Cynthia (2006-07-28). “Finding evolution in medicine” (hmtl). NIH Record 58 (15). http://nihrecord.od.nih.gov/newsletters/2006/07_28_2006/story03.htm. Retrieved 2007-10-22.
# ^ a b Ruling, Kitzmiller v. Dover page 83
Must be the media right? lmao
inb4 yes i know i’m being trolled, but what else am i gonna do on a boring wednesday at work?
Everyone blindly accepted global warming as being irrefutable science. Up until the leaked emails blantantly talking about changing study results to meet their needs. The same people that blindly accepted that, like you for instance, are the same ones that blindly accept everything else taught in a liberal, public education science class. *edited*ing tools is all you people are, lacking all ability to stop and wonder “is my teacher full of bull*edited*?”. I questioned the teachers quite often and did outside research on things that didn’t seem to add up.
Btw, I’m not trolling at all, I’m pointing out facts, or lack thereof.
I think both of these statements are not fair enough judgments to make about all liberal colleges and professors.
@ MP I think that creationism is too fine of a line to be taught in school. I am Jewish and am constantly tired of Jesus/Bible toting bull*edited*… The problem with most creationist theories is that it doesn’t include anything but Catholicism/Christianity.
I was referring to middle/high school where most of the brainwashing begins. The only way to prevent a child from being force-fed crap by a teacher at that level is to put them in another class or school, both of which also do harm.
As to the limited scope, you’re right. I wouldn’t have a problem with beliefs of other faiths being taught alongside in such a curriculum. It would also expand understanding of other religions such as Islam and Buddhism. The child knows what religion/sect he is being brought up in and if they’re religious they’re going to filter out the conflicting information and simply use it as a learning opportunity about other people, not so much fact as much as info.
It’s possible for everyone to have their cake and eat it too with this issue, the problem is some like having all the cake for themselves and aren’t willing to share. Demote back to kindergarten IMO.
My beliefs are similar to what Nickname stated.
I have my cake, I’ve feasted upon it, and all the while all the dots line up to form a pretty picture.
NuRayZ said:
MasterP said:
You really want me to do your own research? Spend a few hours googling around, you’ll find it’s about as “scientific” as global warming.
By your logic, if you are taught evolution but have the right to not believe it then it should also be fair to teach creationism. Hey no one said you HAVE to believe it…
While evolution hasn’t been proven, it isn’t simply based on faith and if it has so many holes why does the majority of the science community still accept it as the theory to which life has taken?
“the scientific community there is essentially universal agreement that the evidence of evolution is overwhelming, and the scientific consensus supporting the modern evolutionary synthesis is nearly absolute.”
# ^ Delgado, Cynthia (2006-07-28). “Finding evolution in medicine” (hmtl). NIH Record 58 (15). http://nihrecord.od.nih.gov/newsletters/2006/07_28_2006/story03.htm. Retrieved 2007-10-22.
# ^ a b Ruling, Kitzmiller v. Dover page 83
Must be the media right? lmao
inb4 yes i know i’m being trolled, but what else am i gonna do on a boring wednesday at work?
Everyone blindly accepted global warming as being irrefutable science. Up until the leaked emails blantantly talking about changing study results to meet their needs. The same people that blindly accepted that, like you for instance, are the same ones that blindly accept everything else taught in a liberal, public education science class. *edited*ing tools is all you people are, lacking all ability to stop and wonder “is my teacher full of bull*edited*?”. I questioned the teachers quite often and did outside research on things that didn’t seem to add up.
Btw, I’m not trolling at all, I’m pointing out facts, or lack thereof.
