Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
NuRayZ said:
The difference between them and democrats is democrats don’t precieve themselves as some higher morally and social beings but fallible human beings who make mistakes.
Except when it comes to the environment, gender or race relations, education, foreign affairs, science, voting rights, abortion, culture…
My guess is Bill.
I was always a little confused about the stories in L4D. I wasn’t sure if they all took place, one after another or if they were all possible stories, like alternate versions of the same incident.
SGA already recognizes and funds a gaming club with a set of dedicated execs, a soon-to-be functional constitution, and a history of successul on-campus events. What is their motivation for recognizing and funding a second one?
Ashley Faulkner said:
This is a good idea, though unless we move the comments from the minutes thread…don’t think it will work because people are used to posting under the minutes. But I love the idea.
I locked the minutes thread.
Nickname said:
wait what
Well, the minute threads tend to turn into flame threads. By keeping them seperate, the minutes themselves aren’t surrounded for arguments. This is to keep historical documents looking all oficial. This is just an expieriment. Liam suggested the idea. Blame him!
I’m doing something a little different this time. If you want to comment on the Meeting Minutes, post in this thread. This way, the minutes will stay clean, and all debate/flaming will take place in a sepperate thread. If you don’t like this idea, blame Liam.
Question: Tell me what you think about Me
I buy my own diamonds and I buy my Own rings
only ring your celly when I’m feellin’ lonely
when it’s all over Please get up and leave
I imagine a fight between Major and Nickname would end up something like this.
It’s like BOOM! I put it in the hoop like SLAM! I heard the crowd screamin out jam! I swear that I’m telling you the facts. And that’s how I beat Shaq.
Lieutenant Dan said:
There’s been concerns over vote stacking on IRC.
Bull*edited*. At one meeting, Fascist Flakes got enthusiastic about a tournament, and jokingly typed down its name a few times. A few corrupt individuals then accused him of vote stacking. If we are going to count the votes of a handful of the president’s friends who couldn’t make the meeting or irc, then we should count online voting.
Bitey said:
Mitch your desktop is by far the *edited*est desktop ever, I see butterflies and flowers? WTF…
I disagree…
Liquid said:
It’s not a family or a business. It’s a club. We have to do what is popular. If anyone has a problem with the games that are being voted in, come to the meetings and support for what you vote for by going to the LANs.
If this is true, we should allow people to vote over irc. After all, if someone off-campus can vote on games, they are more likely to show up to the LAN. Also, at the last meeting, two people who were not at the meeting or irc ha their votes counted.
Imagine siting at your computer, when you hear the following comng from your TV:
“Here to discuss partial-birth abortion are Jack Sparrow, Princess Zelda, and Jesus Christ.”
That’s pretty much how I felt.
You know what? This is my thread. If anyone is entitled to derail, it’s me.
Presenting the Gaming Club’s official mascot: THE DRAMA LLAMA!!
Unless I am mistaken, we tried having a Starcraft tournament a year and a half ago and it was canceled. What happened there?
Asystole said:
What right do you have to delete my post?
He’s the Webmaster. This is pretty much his kingdom.
