Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantHe understands where the pressure is coming from.
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantEveryone is putting more pressure on him then they did Bush. People are going to judge the *edited* out of everything that he does and if theres a lot more MPs out there you know it will all surface.
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantMasterP said:
Actually that’s wrong, I’ve said from day one that McCain wasn’t a republican. If it had been up to republicans, he wouldn’t have even been the party’s nominee.You understand what you just said right? McCain appointed by the republican party to represent the republican party on republican issues is now somehow not republican? Wow.
MasterP said:
It’s kind of broad to say that anything McCain would have done would have been wrong because even you’ll admit Bush did some stuff right. The rest of your point is moot anyway because if McCain had won the media would be hounding his every move like they did with Bush. There’d be no reason for me to do any research or posting on his actions as there are five major news stations in this country that would give you all the “objective reporting” you’d ever need on him. As it is now, none of the major stations are objective anymore. Even Fox refuses to report about the Messiah’s blunders or mistakes. If Bush had screwed up during the oath of office, you know *edited* well how much it would have been replayed on TV and he’d have been titled the “Stupidest president in American history” on that mistake alone but since Obama did it it’s the Chief Justice’s fault.I never said that Bush didn’t do everything wrong but when the bad out way the good there is a problem that should be fixed. Fox is one of the most biased and unjust news channels/internet websites out there. If most of the time you sit at home and watch fox then all you’ve probably been doing is listening to Nancy Grace as she is still talking about the Caylee case. That being said, change the channel.
YouWinGameOver
Participantonce again

Anything McCain would have done would have been wrong too and the only reason you wont admit that is because he is a republican and then in 3yrs when he *edited*s *edited* over you will say that you don’t consider him a republican and never did because he has some “liberal” agenda. You are *edited*ing ridiculous. This is not bashing or flaming this is the truth.
YouWinGameOver
Participantcant wait
YouWinGameOver
Participant
No matter what anyone says you are going to troll the hell out of them.
YouWinGameOver
Participantyou are a *edited*
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantNo. And No.
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantlockEm said:
Yeah, living your lives, being better off than other people justifies the death of thousands of innocent people.That isn’t what I said. I am not going to defend myself on this one because you all have very different views on the subject matter than I do. You will all also bash what ever I have to say so on that note consider this my response.
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantMasterP said:
Your post directly answered mine and was arguing against the point I was trying to make. If you weren’t talking to me you sure hid it well.If you were trying to support my stance it sure didn’t look like it. It looked alot like you were backing up sticky’s sentiment.
As to that last part, idk what to say. First you thank me for being a jerk, then apologize for not making your post clearer, then say that I wasn’t a jerk, then tell me not to be so confrontational, then admit that I wasn’t confrontational this time. Wtf man?
She is saying that she should have quoted sticky and apologized for that. She is not apologizing to you for being a jerk. She said that most of the time you are.
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantNo I am not. I have a lot of reasons we let this happen to ourselves.
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantI think if there is an unusual amount of maps the server has to load it may *edited* brixxxx but I think it should be fine.
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantPink Monkey #5 said:
Did you really just say that it was our fault that terrorists hijacked 4 planes and killed several thousand innocent peoplebecause we somehow deserved it? Are you prepared to defend that to families of the victims? Please inform me how on
earth that was our fault…
Yes I did and I have defended this in front of people who were there and people whose families have died.
YouWinGameOver
Participanttorankusu said:
This guy’s been on my *edited*list for being annoying and annoying certain regulars.same
YouWinGameOver
Participantor just some common knowledge….its customary to only go to 1 bomb site
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantI think it represents an aim bot for a little while but some of the shots are solid kills by listening to footsteps and what not.
I think we need another demo.
YouWinGameOver
Participantagreed.
fix me a drink so we can play this rotation
YouWinGameOver
Participantthats awesome
YouWinGameOver
Participanttorankusu said:
There’s no rule about going A only when there’s only a few people in the server. People *edited* when you play the whole map when there’s only a few people, and they happen to be at the site where the t’s AREN’T. I consider it more like an accommodation for the noobs who can’t rush from one bombsite to the other when the bomb’s planted. Forcing the t’s to play only at A makes for easy picking for the better players on ct, even if the t’s have three ways to get into A. A skilled awper can watch all three entrances. I’ve seen t’s be successful vs. ct, but it’s usually the other way around, I think, since cts just have to camp A.Personally, I think the slay was unwarranted. It’s a common courtesy for noobs, but as far as I know, it’s not a rule in our server.
Toran is completely right I usually spam the all say with hey A only or pistols when there is 6ppl or less on the server cause its fun and to the point.
But said again…its not a rule in the server.
YouWinGameOver
Participantherbals rotation is really good with the exception of how long dodgeball is…
edit: I think I said this before in the last thread this rotation was in.
YouWinGameOver
Participantmy laptop plays l4d decently and its an inspiron 1501…they should be 4-500 now… its not the greatest machine ever (not in anyones lifetime) but I can play and I enjoy it.
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantLiam said:
I will read more of this thread when I get home, but I’m going to be point blank.If you cannot be civil on the forums towards other members then I will gladly remove you.
Everything you posted short of your original post has been rude, condescending, or threatening.
Swearing at people does NOTHING. If you cannot behave and act like a mature individual then go find somewhere else to play.
I was trying to say this earlier but everytime I went to write something down all I could do was say that Ex needed to look at the situations better in the future and Willis needs to understand that although he is mad he really needs to think what he says through.
YouWinGameOver
Participantbecause we both intensely hate non-ct residents with a passion
YouWinGameOver
Participanthate you really *edited*ing hate you
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantI guess lock the thread then cause its over.
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantAnd I agree with you on that. I just did not know the number was so small.
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantMasterP said:
That’s great in concept but you’ve obviously never played CSS. Ever since they put toggles in their hacks it has become increasingly hard to catch hackers. The CLs have this ability so that those special individuals that no one can get a good demo of can still be banned. As Liam said, it is doubtful that this rule will be removed as it would force the execs and CLs to take demos of even the most obvious hackers.If you’ll remember not that long ago the issue came up of whether or not to ban someone because their main account they had been using on our server was VAC banned. The player had been banned several times but because of the “burden of proof” that normal admins have they could never get a demo that made the ban stick. Now obviously he was hacking or he wouldn’t have been VAC banned. Had this power been utilized then it would have saved a ton of headaches as most of the admins on the server were watching his every move and everytime he got banned everyone who hadn’t spent all that time spec’ing him thought he was completely innocent.
Lawlrence has been on the admin’s “watch list” for months. This whole situation didn’t start overnight. You’d actually be surprised how sketchy some players get when they don’t think admins are on. With some players, it’s almost night and day.
@ Liam-I understand this and I realized that it would be ridiculous to have every single demo posted on everyone and when you think about it it is really only 3-4 ppl total who have that ability.
@MP-I have played css in fact I played for a better part of a year. I do remember the VAC account ordeal and I know that lawlrence has been on the watch list for awhile. But this has nothing to do with him specifically it was a general request a change and because I know that it is only a couple of people who have this power who will hopefully not abuse it I am not sorry that I started the thread but I am sorry that it came back to lawlrence.
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantThe only reason I say 30min is too much is because I really think it is. I don’t want to be on a map for more then 25min, that extra 5min sometimes is the reason I leave.
YouWinGameOver
ParticipantNO NO NO STOP PLAYING DONKEY KOOOOOOOOONG
-
AuthorPosts