Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
newrayzParticipantNickname said:
HAHAHAHAHA VT LOST TO GT!!!
THIIISSS!!!!!
newrayzParticipantNickname said:
That’s a pretty slippery slope because that would mean like admins for the CS server would be considered officers and would need to be students, meaning we would have almost no admins for our servers at all…
lol times a trillion isn’t stretching the foreseeable demise.
in fact, it’s probably an understatement.
edit:
sorry about the flames guys. I’m done.
newrayzParticipantnay me neither. I wouldn’t say i don’t have any friends where I am at tho. I just have to much love to spread around in just one place. lol
the fact of the matter is I started in the 1.6 server back in 06, and community has been kick *edited* ever since.
newrayzParticipantManlyMoose said:
The fact of the matter is that WCU does not allow Alumni in clubs, much less hold ANY position inside of said club. I’m assuming the servers are WCU property… in which case if we are investigated, as JAS was, it could end with complete removal of all servers, funding as well as a fine. If you really care about the “club” and not having just your own CS servers, why not help willing members learn how to take the admin position for the servers?
first question is why is this brought up now? This has never been an issue before, for years. I’m not saying you are the one to ‘snitch’ on the club, but the way you describe it someone could easily completely destroy the club with a simple phone call. Threats like that are just uncalled for (again im not saying you are the one doing the threatening, but hypothetically speaking).
The knowledge and work they provide are all voluntary. Do you really think people would want to take on the daunting task of learning everything it is they know? I know i wouldn’t And to the point where they can effectively manage and run the inner workings of the club as well as it is run? To me, this transition people are asking for would be a complete mess, and it would take a long time to pass on the info.
why can’t people be happy with the fact that everything is provided for them, free of charge, and time. These guys don’t have to be doing this, and their effort makes wcugaming.org a much much more enjoyable and functional place.
newrayzParticipantMasterP said:
Like having LANs with internet access? Like having those giant switches? Like having game servers? Like having the forums? Like having 60 free Steam LAN accounts?
Without alumni, none of that happens.
If you’re planning on doing what I think you’re doing this is a very bad idea. Remember that no one on campus has even attempted to learn what we do to keep things going so when something does break, the forums are just gone. The stats tracking just goes away. The website, poof, becomes no more.
The fact that Kaz-ka would even consider this notion is, well, sad.
make that times a trillion.
newrayzParticipantKaz-Ka said:
It was brought to my attention last night that some people and execs are not very happy with all of the power the Alumni Advisers that do not go to this school anymore have.
no offense to liam, but everyone remember him going a.w.o.l.??? imagine that but times a billion.
the alumni are the life force of the club, hope the result of this meeting doesn’t *edited* them off to much. =/
newrayzParticipantMr. PMosh said:
Far Cry 2 – How did you see me when I’m a quarter mile away?
pffft.
just like farve and his fake retirement ways.
newrayzParticipantDuendes said:
NuRayZ said:
i hate rachel ray, but after finding this picture, my mind has slightly changed.

Giada De Laurentiis is hotter and less of a chubby
that jaw is pretty intimidating.
nice rack tho.
newrayzParticipantThe Stache said:
Well I guess Mitch should shave his pedostache by your logic that and it doesn’t look like you have a beard there Mr 5yr Old
Are you blind? Clearly I have a very thick koolaid stache. btw that’s my baby cousin who just turned 4 tyvm
btw you may feel a slight tingling sensation in the near near future.
don’t be alarmed, it’s just the ban hammer caving in your face.
newrayzParticipantMasterP said:
Guild Wars had no monthly fee…
i know
just saying if they added one plus the expansions. would be fail.
newrayzParticipant
i hate rachel ray, but after finding this picture, my mind has slightly changed.
newrayzParticipanttorankusu said:
Also, I’ve posted this in the past, but sometime last year, Liam changed /me so that it only displayed your dmg when you were dead, so people couldn’t abuse it (like spamming or throwing nades and then using /me to see if they’re hitting anyone). Months ago (but sometime this year) when the server was being worked on or something, /me somehow got reversed and now it will allow you to view dmg when you’re ALIVE, but it shows 0 when you’re dead. Could this be corrected? Thanks!
NO!!!
and by no i mean i dont know. lol
should see about shortening office to a smaller play time. anything below 10 minutes. I’ve seen a healthy pop go bye bye to many times due to that map. Or take it out of the rotation and leave it for votemaps??
newrayzParticipantdoes anyone else sometimes get the words “posted image” instead of the actual image? I had to quote bang shishigami just to see what he posted. This has happened a couple of times lately…
newrayzParticipantMasterP said:
I imagine they’ll release expansion packs that add aditional characters. I’m almost expecting Diablo3 to be Blizzard’s Guild Wars version of WoW with semi-frequent expansions.
that would be okay as long as they don’t charge monthly fee to play AND release a million expansions every quarter. *edited* those fat cats.
newrayzParticipantManlyMoose said:
Don’t get all butt hurt cause there’s a picture on imageshack. If there is a picture ANYWHERE on the net, it is the same *edited* thing. Get the drama queen a tub of Ben and Jerry’s so they can get over it.
this a friend of yours? lol.
newrayzParticipantdo you like being stupid, stache? Ooooh new nickame for ya, STUPID STACHE. beautiful.
btw, real men grow beards. my beard > the stache. Do yourself a favor and shave.
newrayzParticipantGameover as much as I agree with what you say, masterp is right, no need to cuss him out. lol it’s the politics and although things get heated at times (as they should), opposing parties need to rise above personal attacks and condescending statements. we are all on the same team here. MasterP just likes to be blunt with things, which comes off as a bit shrewd but hey it’s the internet, not sesame street haha.
All in all i do agree with you though.
MasterP said:
Pink Monkey #13 said:
Ephraim said:
<3 you too. No homo.
that reply is slightly comical in the context of this thread.
Oddly enough I had already thought the exact same thing.
lol.
newrayzParticipantoh and hitz awesome vid. Donno if i can do the empty cigarette box dance tho lol
newrayzParticipantMasterP said:
Well let’s put this in Darwin liberal terms then. How does a species reproduce? It’s not male-male, it’s male-female. If *edited*s don’t reproduce eventually that “genetic abnormality” will extinct itself and we’ll be back to status-quo as nature intended. IF however it’s not genetic and truely is a choice, as us “ultra-conservatives” believe, then regardless of how much homosexuals don’t reproduce they’ll always be more of them. According to genetics and nature, this is not possible. Unless homosexuality is a disease and I’m not going that route.
nowadays we have test tube babies, so technically they could reproduce

a choice would be whether i want chocolate or vanilla ice cream. I don’t choose to have relations with women, I am attracted to them. Tell me, if it’s a choice, what could possibly be causing them to choose that? The devil? lol
but wait, lets back up a little. There is evidence of homosexual behavior in animals. Sure they can’t reproduce, and therefore should die off, and do. But then the following generation those blasted homos are back! but how? Now, are you telling me then that they are choosing to do that? So now ‘ultra-conservatives’ would be conceding to the fact that animals have consciousness?!?! That totally goes against the conservative way rofl
just thought it kinda funny, of course animal behavior is not rational but instinctive. Could it be that is where it comes from, that some people’s instincts tell them their *edited*? hmm..maybe. I guess the question arises is whether or not you believe we are born with instincts or a clean slate. Oh how fun that lecture was in philosophy class!
newrayzParticipantNuRayZ said:

Rachel Ray is here to eat this thread with her coffee.
unlEASH rachel ray X2
you don’t want to make the she-hulk angry.
newrayzParticipantThe Stache said:
Yo HitzlspergeR, I’m really happy for you, I’mma let you finish but Bang Shishigami had one of the best dance tracks of all time. One of the best dance tracks of all time!
LINK REMOVED
seriously dude wtf.
idc if your the *edited*in stache, don’t go posting stupid *edited* like that. Like Hitz said ban this *edited*ing nerd.
/rant
newrayzParticipantYAAAR HAPPY BIRHTDAY MATTTIEEEEEE
newrayzParticipantMasterP said:
NuRayZ said:
Unlike a *edited* guy, a woman is genetically different than a man.
Last I checked the running liberal excuse for being *edited* was that they were genetically predisposed to be that way. This would make them genetically different from straight men, just like women.
well i don’t buy that from my fellow libs. Wouldn’t it be all over the news if they found a ‘*edited* gene’? I know of some research done to try and find one, but i’m pretty sure they couldn’t find it.
i think some choose to be *edited*, and others are *edited* from the get go. My cousin was *edited* since forever(btw i’ll get back at you with the picture thing). I also knew a girl in middle school who had a crush on me and after years of rejection (totally not my fault, she was just really ugly =/) she decided she was *edited*.
but hell if they want to flaunt their *edited*ness and take a bullet for the country go right ahead. Whatever happens it will be interesting to see the reaction of either side. Too bad their isn’t a solution to make everyone happy. =/
newrayzParticipantEphraim said:
I think this is a decision that should only be made by top military officials.
Last time i checked, Commander-in-Chief, was about as top and official as the military gets.
newrayzParticipantMasterP said:
The military isn’t about sexuality, it’s about creating cookie-cutter soldiers. The second you allow sexuality or sexual preference to enter into the equation you instantly create differences between soldiers that no amount of training can compensate for.
If you REALLY care about serving, and that’s the sole reason you’re there, why does it matter that you can’t be openly *edited*. All they want to do is prove a point or show the world they’re *edited*, those making a big deal over this have no interest in serving this country. Being a soldier is a secondary concern to forcing their sexual choices and ideals on the rest of us.
they aren’t forcing anything on us. If anything we are forcing them to be silent. If they say anything, they get the boot. How is that fair? I have a cousin who is openly *edited*, and serves in the Spanish Military. He holds an officer position. He could probably kick the majority of straight tards against this. And he is married (Spain, one of the most catholic countries, allows *edited* marriage lol). Now if he were in the US military, he couldn’t have pictures of his loved one (much less get legally married). He is risking his life and would have to write, view, and communicate back to his family in total seclusion. Any suspicion of someone being *edited* in the army mind you can still lead to an investigation. So how is that fair agian?
oh and the whole cookie cutter soldiers thing is all fine and nice, except…WE LET WOMEN JOIN THE MILITARY. Unlike a *edited* guy, a woman is genetically different than a man. Now I’m no sexist, but by the whole cookie cutter theory, we shouldn’t allow women to fight because they are “inferior to men” in strength and stamina and blah blah.
and contrary to what most republitards think, most military dudes could give a rats *edited* if someone serves openly *edited*. Like you said they are there to fight.
newrayzParticipantNuRayZ said:
A soccer mom who gained national attention when she openly carried a loaded gun to her 5-year-old daughter’s game was shot dead Wednesday along with her husband in what appeared to be a murder-suicide, police said.
so a follow up to this story. the soccer mom was chatting online with a friend when her husband came in and emptied a 9mm into her. The friend said he didn’t see the initial shot, but did hear the first gun shot and scream and then looked back on screen and saw the husband firing the rest of the rounds. Police said the husband then went upstairs and blew his head off with a 12 gauge. freakin crazy.
newrayzParticipant
Rachel Ray is here to eat this thread with her coffee.
newrayzParticipantMr. PMosh said:
NuRayZ said:
that would go in the failure thread i would think.
I know no other thread besides this one.
diabloiii thread? liar.
newrayzParticipantlootool said:
ROSSY FORGOT TO BRING 1.6 COMPUTER?? oh noes…LOOT. (one oh oh gunLOOKINGnumber)

-
AuthorPosts