Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Major likes to play with my head
Though, I’d prefer someone with more of a girlish figure, and bigger boobs
torankusu said:
LOL MAJOR. That’s hilarious. I love your MS Paint skillz and Ray’z (I didn’t want to use Rayz’s) pixelated face.pixelated face of Rayz.
Bananarchy said:
Wow I really really liked the dracula one (and I dont say that about art much). It was both dark and lighthearted at the same time
Since I like to make threads about me, here is a picture of a sculpture I made in advanced ceramics (I am a psych major, so I have an excuse for it to be bad). It has since got wtfpwt on the trip to the kiln room, but was fun while it lasted.
dude that looks pretty sweet. Must have taken a long *edited* time to make. At least you got a picture of it, now that it’s destroyed it makes it that much more special
Update:
Bitey
I had fun with this one. I liked your original so much, i just decided to do a variation of it.
Citan001 said:
So you think we should just nuke the whole place? It has been proven time and time again that an invading army will always fail unless they are willing to do scorched earth tactics. We had no reason to go in there in the first place and it was a much better place untill we went in there. Now you hear reports every day of people blowing everything up. I see that sadam had to rule with an iron fist because if not he would lost control like we have done. At any rate that is off topic. Certain things need to be taken over by the government like banking. We are after all using paper money that is backed by the government it only makes sence for them to control it.Down with Paper Money!!! Viva La Revolution!!!
Nickname where you at!
KaMiKaZe said:
I’m just saying if you crush the will to fight they will no longer fight. It has been proven over and over again throughout different wars. You have to make it too costly for them to continue and then they’ll stop. By us handcuffing our soldiers we needlessly endager them and cost them more lives in the field. We need to take the handcuffs off and let those in the field handle it as they feel it should be handled cause there the ones who live it everyday instead of politicians in washington making those decisions for themagreed.
KaMiKaZe said:
If politicians and bleeding heart citizens didn’t handicap the soldiers we currently have fighting the whole thing could have been done with already. When we fought in WW2 we were a far more effective force due to the fact that the military was in charge of guess what the military. I know this is a novel idea but I think we should go back to it as it got results. Bleeding heart pacifists go ohh no we can’t have our soldiers blowing up that hospital or ohh no we can’t blow up that school where will the people go. Well if their armies want to hide weapons in it and fill it with people so that we won’t bomb it, they effectively take out some of our best weapons. World war 2 they have a ball bearing plant in a city lets say hamelburg and we need to knock it out, we wiped out the entire area around it. Collateral damage happens its called war for a reason and people need to realize that and stop hamstringing our military because those same people given the oppurtunity would not return those same courtesies back. They blow a building we blow up a block of buildings, they blow up a block we blow up a town, etc… they have to learn there are consequences and that its futile to engage in the activity. The israelis had it right before they stopped. they shoot a rocket they blew up the street it came from. They mobilize more rockets, israel levels every block they passed on. It may not be very clean or nice but no war is.Eye for and eye basically, sure its been around for thousands and thousands of years, but that doesn’t mean I have to accept it as right. I think its wrong. Call me a bleeding heart, but I personally think humans are better than that. I don’t think what either side is doing is right. War and everything that comes with it may be necessary to survive in the past, but when it boils down to it, War is going to destroy us all.
Now you can think, “these people will never understand us, that they don’t want to negotiate.” I agree, some of them are hopeless. Simply taking them out, is indeed effective, but again is a step backwards in my mind in terms of our progression as a species. Blowing them up brings up more complex issues. Those blocks that were blown up, are gone now. Anyone who wasn’t an enemy who may have had friends/associations/families or anyone there, anything there, is now an enemy. You see the endless cycle?
I’m not saying we should give up our fights right this second, and I’m not dogging any soldier because of them I have the freedom to type this reply. The evolution of war has changed, and eventually it will change again. We will eventually have to evolve from warring altogether, or we will end up just blowing each other off the planet.
MasterP said:
Unfortunately for your argument they did happen to find enough nuclear material to give Iran’s president a pretty powerful wet dream. Just because they were left over doesn’t mean they weren’t there. That’s retarded. It’s like saying the leftovers in your fridge don’t exist because they are old.
Besides, biased source is biased.
So? If a mom and pop store is poorly run do you expect the government to step in and save them? What if 100 such stores close? 1000? The government doesn’t care about them and small businesses fail EVERY DAY and with them go thousands of jobs EVERY DAY but you never hear about them because they aren’t “big enough”. Now why is it fair for the government to save some jobs and not others? How are rural jobs less deserving of bailout money than urban jobs?
The real truth is no company is too big to fail. I’m sorry that people lose their jobs but that’s the way it is in every country on the planet. I guess your ideal society would have everyone working for the government in a “safe” job that’s never outsourced and never made to compete but there’s only one system of government that’s ever tried that and I do believe most of those countries failed harder than any individual company or industry would have failed. If we continue on this path of blindly tossing money to fix companies unwilling to be fixed eventually we will run out of money because let’s face it, you can’t steal from the rich forever. Eventually the rich will be made poor and, if the current trend continues, simultaneously NOT make the poor any richer. That leads to the failure of our country.
Your own quote a few posts back said there were WMD components there. You killed your own argument…
First of all. I think small businesses should get help too. But If you owned a company, and it was failing, you would want someone to help, hence Pseudo Laissez faire.
Secondly:
Oh too biased for you? Keep thinking he never lied about his war. His words say otherwise.
OH AND LOOKIE THERE. BUSH says it himself: “He didn’t have WMDs but he had the compacity.” I’m not arguing with you on whether or not Iraq had things that could be potential WMDs. I’m arguing the fact that Bush and his goons didn’t speak in POTENTIALITIES when he said their WERE WMDs in Iraq. HE was SO sure. You don’t say you are sure, unless you are sure. And you don’t say there are WMD, when in actuality you have no idea, and just have a hunch that there are just parts to be assembled. I’ll take your left overs argument. If you have tomatoes, lettuce, and ham, but are missing bread, would you still say “Hey I got a sandwitch in my fridge.” NO YOU WOULDN’T. Because that would be lying. A lie that has cost us thousands of lives. My argument still stands, you don’t go to war if you are unsure, that’s rediculous. It was a private agenda from the get go.
but enough about the past. It’s kind of pointless to argue about, what’s done is done. I’m just so excited about the next chapter on the war on terror. Chapter II:Back to Afghanistan yay
MajorMajorMajor said:
Consider the SourceMy and my friends edited Ray Jackendoff’s wiki page to contain several innuendos, and detract from the truth of the article.
Conspiracy Theory Moment: There are still many areas in Iraq that we either a) do not control or
do not want to control that have not been checked yet, and that may or may not be inhabitable. Therefore you cannot say with 100% certainty that they are/were no WMDs in Iraq. :shiftyeyes_anim: Course personally I just do not trust what the media tells me, and I do not care either way if they were there or not. I’m just happy my cousin is coming home soon…. then going to Afghanistan YAY
Lies!!!
Wikipedia 4 LYF!!!
So because we aren’t 100% sure that there are NO WMDs means we CANT say their are no weapons of mass destruction?
Yet when Bush wasn’t 100% sure about WMDs, that means it’s okay to say “There are WMD’s over there”? That isn’t logical. If you can say with uncertainty that there are WMDs, you can also say with uncertainty that there are NO WMDs.
The fact is we were unsure. Yet he told us he was certain.
Citan001 said:
they were? I cant tell if you were joking or not…I dunno how well you all follow the news when it comes to the economy but I follow it like a hawk and the sad part is that yes some companies are so big and vital that the government cant let them fail. As it stands now the government has some stake in every major bank in the us right now. They forced Bank of America to take tarp funds and with it BofA had to give some stock to the government. It will happen more and more often as we get deeper and deeper into the depression. America was the beacon of hope for free trade but everyone sees what a mess we made and they are no longer supporting free trade.I kinda agree.
I’m sick of the unrealistic idea of “let the banks fail”, that it’s healthy for the economy spew. So let the banks and giant businesses fail? That means we let the people who work for them, who rely on them, fail too. There will be millions more without jobs if we didn’t assist in some way. Failure is a last resort, especially with retardedly huge companies. Majority of the employees that will get tossed cause of “higher up’s” getting greedy, don’t diverse that. It’s not there fault. That’s why the government is stepping in, to save jobs. Wanna talk about displacement? Displacement of jobs, of LIVES. The people who get hit the hardest in a depression are the middle to lower class. Don’t forget that, *edited* right the government should step in, because I’ll be damned if I let the poor get poorer and let them suffer more than they already are. When the times are tough government should step in, to buffer, assist, cushion.
Pseudo Laissez-Faire. You know what that means? Leave it alone, UNLESS it needs help or fixing. well, uhm ALOT needs fixing, which is why the government ought to step in.
MajorMajorMajor said:
they were there what are you talking about?Great controversy emerged when no stockpiles of WMDs were found, leading to accusations that the United States, its President George W. Bush in particular, had deliberately inflated intelligence or lied about Iraq’s weapons in order to justify an invasion of the country. The Center for Public Integrity asserted President Bush’s administration made a total of 935 false statements between 2001 and 2003 about Iraq’s alleged threat to the United States.[3]While various inert, leftover WMDs and weapons components from the 1980s and 1990s have been found, most weapons inspectors now believe that Iraq’s chemical weapons program ceased production after 1991.
There were no stockpiles of WMDs found. 935 false statements. aka Blind loyalty.
I wish we had this thread years ago. lol
It’s not blind loyalty, it’s just me dealing with what I voted for. But lets not talk about blind loyalty, seeing how that’s what led us to weapons of mass destruction in Iraq…oh wait.
MasterP said:
So the entire history of our market and how things work is wrong and Obama is right? Gee, if only Bush had this sort of blind loyalty he could have invaded the entirety of the Middle East and half of Europe before anyone woke up
I wish we had this thread years ago. lol
It’s not blind loyalty, it’s just me dealing with what I voted for. But lets not talk about blind loyalty, seeing how that’s what led us to weapons of mass destruction in Iraq…oh wait.
Brian said:
The french government has actually denationalized a lot of it’s economy in the last twenty years.The military should not be privatized, pretty obvious why(The rule of law fellas)
Salon is generally full of a lot of *edited*, especially joan walsh, the editor in chief. The guest columnist and dike in residence(i actually love reading her) camille paglia usually hits the nail on the head though.
Your principle of government failing at whatever it does is not as apodictic as you believe masterp. Do you think about it very much or is something you repeat in your head every time you see the government incidentally *edited*ing up.
Well if a Republican can’t do it in eight years, there is no way a BLACK DEMOCRAT man can succeed. The logic being: obviously to any republican, the right is always right, and if they were ever wrong (coincidently the last eight years), any other way can’t possibly be right. Any other way is wrong apparently. So what could be worse than wrong? Oh that’s right, the end of the world/USA/Democracy/Capitalism!!! :arrowhead: Silly Elephants…lol
Bitey said:
Where is mine, I got ignored!!!! I’m hurt..Lol yours is on my to do list. Since you already have a pretty player sig, I need to make yours extra good. So it’ll take time.
NoDice said:
maybe could clean up the header logo for the forums so its not so pixelated
I increased the pixel size to 150 psi. It was at 72, which makes anything look ugly. well for printing anyway, hope that doesn’t complicate things.
Also, I took the liberty to change it to Papyrus
kind of, but it reads more like a bash on republicans. The article seemed more about nationalization being inevitable, and how it isn’t the total take over the republicans are ranting about. And how it’s just scare tactics by republicans. Thats what I perceived anyway.
I was watching Mad Money the other day. He’s a loon but brought up a good point. There is more regulation on gambling and in Las Vegas than there is on Wall Street. Wouldn’t it make more sense to regulate Wall street more, it seems like corruption and greed there is far more detrimental to society than in casinos. Same with the banks, I think someone should step in when banks are not getting the job done, especially when it effects millions of people’s lives. It doesn’t have to be a total take over, like the republicans fear, but at least some more regulation, some kind of punishment, or something.
Nickname said:
This looks like MasterP’s kind of article, so I will just leave this here.MasterP wouldn’t agree with this article, its slanted to the left. lol
but I find it interesting.
“any nationalization is likely to be brief, narrow and aimed at saving any assets worth saving from banks that would otherwise go under. (Which isn’t that different from what the U.S. already does with failed banks.) But to Republicans, the details seem beside the point. “Nationalization” is just another way to make voters fear Obama’s stewardship of the economy.”
if we do “nationalize” it won’t be forever, and it’s not the gonna be the evil take over the republicans claim. I say QQ Republicants!
Nickname said:
If I can figure out the right proportions, I would love to have something similar on the CSS servers as wellas soon as I get those proportions i’m on it. like white on rice. Or flies on poo. Or like major on little boys.
B R I E F S said:
I say fast food is as bad if not worse for you then pot!They should have a fast food/pot joint. lol joint
I’ll take the quarter pounder with a side of chronic. And HASH BROWNies. mmmm
MajorMajorMajor said:
so, so winmove this thread to the winrar thread!
nah leave it open, or at most change the name to Custom Designing or something like that. If anyone needs a design/logo/sig/etc they can post here. Free of charge!
how dare you deny the people this kind of service, you too cruel :axehead:
its time you stop lying to us Manlycan aka adam37!
Change your name to Adambomb#2…everyone thinks of that when they think of you anyway.
the rotation looks solid btw
NoDice said:
looks great,, the website kinda blends in,, wut do you tihnk about like having this pointing to it.. lulz
lol I like it. Blends in nicely too. let me know if i need to upload this version onto photobucket
Okay so this is kind of where I’m going with the L4D page. I can change the font and add anything. Lemme know what it needs.
http://i709.photobucket.com/albums/ww94/newrayz/L4Dcopy.jpg
lootool said:
whats up with all them same size new sigs? duz the site make it easy to make cool roflstyle sigs? Major was a great CL..I dig all the 1.6 CL’s..past and present…LOOT.I gained a level yesterday in real life, and put a point into my designing skill. I can now make any roflstyle sig or design free of charge.
Nickname said:
I need something approximately 1200×600 pixels (must be 2:1 ratio) that has zombies, the WCU logo, and our website at the very least. The banner that is there which will appear above it is this: http://tf2.wcugaming.org/l4d/motd.jpg If you can improve on that (while keeping it the same size), that would be awesome too.I’ll get right on it.
Also your new signature is ready earlier than i said:
http://i709.photobucket.com/albums/ww94/ne…z/Nickname2.jpg
Hope you like it.
