Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Pink Monkey #13 said:
dead. we need freakin stats up to bring it back, imho
well that sucks… what’s the IP anyways? the one thats listed under the link to the forum won’t add to favorites. i’ll try to help populate it again
nuke was taken off because it would sometimes clear the server. if the rotation is changed, order or maps should come first… if people still arent happy with it, than maybe add some maps that havent been tried before.
but the rotation seems to be working pretty well right now.
i believe votekick would be for afk’s, i dont think the 15 minute ban would be appropriate, thats why you would have the voteban option…
but i completely agree with amerrill, i think the server is better without it.
if it is installed i would think that at least 10 people would have to be in the server for the option to be available, and again only if an admin is not on.
yes for mute, and no for the other two…
some people just make too much noise.
i just dont see the last two enhancing the server… especially banning, there are plenty of admins to take care of that. and if they arent enough, then ill apply
personally, i like more maps…. i get tired of playing the same thing over and over. plus a lot of custom maps are better than the classic maps, especially in balance.
add more! haha
was this map ever going to be converted to source? id be interested in checking it out…
i just thought it was interesting… i wasnt suggesting stopping working on it, or to take it off the 1.6 server
i think prodigy should stay 10 minutes of it is fine. i agree on italy, again 10 minutes wouldnt be that bad though.
how about more sk3?? ha j/k id love it, but i think some would be mad
off topic:
im not a huge awp fan, but i do think the restriction is a little harsh. if there is one at all, i think it should be 3 per team
there are a ton of maps out there, if you want proven custom maps then check out some other servers and see what they run, and how successful they are there. or even check out the ratings on fps banana for the map to see how respected it is (not perfect but works pretty well). ive played a few servers with paris_opt or paris on it, and its a really popular map, ive suggested it before (opt just gets better fps and more consistent). the play style is a lot like dust2 which is a very popular map. i suggest you check that one out if you are looking to add a few “different” maps with out getting too far from what we already have. plus its just a visually cool map which a lot of times draws people in.
it’s fairly easy to record a demo. if anyone was blatantly hacking (shaking screen, all head shots – the things we’ve all seen before) a 20 second demo will do and a ban can be made with the proper evidence. But, if it takes an hour of spectating to get proper evidence, then it obviously wasnt as blatant and should be brought up for discussion with the evidence at hand. it seems that numerous rounds were needed for the ban to be made, this imo means that you were personally debating the verdict in your head (sorry if this is a bad assumption). but anyways, if the conclusion is that hard to come across, more opinions are need.
again, i dont think giving anyone power to ban someone with no tangible evidence is a good idea. ive been playing here for almost 4 years and have a good feeling as the how the server should be ran. ive disagreed with bans in the past, but at least they were put up to votes with demos (i.e. sushi).
not that any of you care what i think haha, but i agree, i dont care what position anyone has, you should still provide a demo if you are banning someone. if not, whats to stop you from banning people you just dont like? and how can the checks and balances work if all you are going by is personal accounts… with no tangible proof, there is no way a balance check can work, its just word of mouth. in the future, i think that every admin/council leader/ webmaster/ whoever should have to provide some evidence for the reasoning of a ban. if the process is going to be as fair as possible, the banned person should always be given a chance to have others review his case.
ammendments can be made to constitutions, and in this case i think it should (for future reference).
thank you liam! like i said paris_opt… itll be an instant hit
the only other thing ill add is that militia, contra and, havana consecutively will just empty the server because there’s no big name map. I suggest moving inferno to contra’s spot and then switching contra to piranesi’s spot and piranesi to the original inferno spot. might want to consider doing something similar for the lost temple – russka section as well. thanks! looks good though, just some suggestions
give it a chance!!
de_paris_opt
really really fun map. i know you all will like it!
http://www.fpsbanana.com/maps/55725
cpl_mill, inferno, contra, dust2, lost temple pro russka chateau piranesi and sk3 with paris opt would be a perfect rotation in my opinion
we should seriously consider adding paris_opt… it plays a lot like dust2 and people tend to love it… check it out and say what you think
http://www.fpsbanana.com/maps/55725
plus everyone will get good fps on it so people wont complain about the map being too intensive
teams are stacked too often in my opinion, i dont think you have to be on your friends team to have fun… but the problem is that its not just 2 or 3 people stacking… its 6 or 7 of the best people on one team, and it just takes too long for the team balancer to even this out.
another thing, would it be possible to better police the clan stacking rule… it just happens way to often for it to be random.
i just think auto-join is a good way to solve this
im pretty sure its just cs:cz with a few skin changes. thats just a advertisement, the actual gameplay looks nothing like that
