menace

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 31 through 60 (of 81 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: ysG’s list of wants for the new server #100774
    menace
    Participant

    adam37 said:

    Well probably because you cant RTV until the map has been played for 5 mins. After that, you can RTV.

    When I typed rtv, it just said the usual need 6 votes or 50%, so it was validating my rtv. Just that nothing happened after everyone rtved. Look at the logs if you want proof. It was probably around 8 or 9 pm last night on havana.

    in reply to: ysG’s list of wants for the new server #100765
    menace
    Participant

    There were 5 ppl on, including me on cs_havana. We all rtved and nothing happened until 5 minutes later when the map changed to chateau. -_-

    in reply to: ysG’s list of wants for the new server #100753
    menace
    Participant

    add: fix rtv so it works.

    in reply to: Gameserver Move #100745
    menace
    Participant

    I think I saw ysg complaining about reg at one point. Maybe we should ban him first.

    in reply to: how’s the server doing? #100681
    menace
    Participant

    MasterP said:

    We’re switching to the new box first thing next week. Let’s try putting the stats on the same machine before weighing down Simpweb.

     

    OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG *head explodes*

    in reply to: Counter-Strike 1.6 Map Rotation #99817
    menace
    Participant

    torankusu said:

    I have to disagree with everything in the previous post.

     

    Well I disagree to your disagree.

    in reply to: Counter-Strike 1.6 Map Rotation #99813
    menace
    Participant

    I wouldn’t mind having italy back on the rotation. It’s kind of like office, a map which I don’t mind playing ct or t cause of its wide array of choke points. With nuke, and with a lot of ppl, Ts are going to get shafted unless they all work together and we all know the chances of that happening. Train’s kind of the same way, with CT camping under trains. Any chance of implementing an awp limit per team to like 2 or 3?

    in reply to: Mouse #99632
    menace
    Participant

    if you use low sensitivity, stick with an optical like the mx518. The lasers have negative acceleration problems at low sens. You can try playing with a 10 dollar mouse but try to do a quick 180 and see if it spazes out.

    in reply to: Best settings for 1.6 #99055
    menace
    Participant

    lockEm said:

    I hate it when people say things like this. It’s an online pub hosted at a university, obviously the registry is going to be no where near as good as LAN, but its not THAT BAD. You’re just awful and blame the server for your *edited*ty aim. Sorry to come off as a douche, but the registry isn’t that bad. Stop complaining.

     

    The admins at one point even said it themselves that the server gets *edited*ty reg cause of the limitation in the hardware. This extends throughout all servers hosted by WCU. This was why they pushed for the new box. I’ve played in other university servers before and they all have better, CONSISTENT reg than what wcu has now. Please try playing in the server more often rather than flaming someone who you know almost nothing about and has more playing hours on the actual, said server.

    in reply to: Best settings for 1.6 #99049
    menace
    Participant

    pffft lay off ritsuka. :P I am just trying to build some excitement for something new to attract people to the club, but it’s kind of a bad sign when I am the only person eagerly anticipating this. Seriously, maybe 3 or 4 other people have showed some reaction to this? Are people really gonna come back and play? More than half the people that I know who use to play 1.6 a year ago don’t touch the game anymore. :-\ I like this server because of the community, but it has terrible and random registry problems, so HELL YAH I am getting antsy about the new one.

    in reply to: New 1.6 Servers #98810
    menace
    Participant

    ok seriously, its been 18 days…like uhh, what’s the dealio? I mean yeah, it’s done when it’s done, but don’t say its all ready to go and then have nothing happen for 2 weeks.

    in reply to: New 1.6 Servers #98720
    menace
    Participant

    Ritsuka said:

    menace said:

    the suspense is killing me. <.< >.> I keep logging on, hoping its the new server, then I see the 3k/s in -_-

    thats cuz we are hidding it from you Xp

    NOOO i need it :(

    in reply to: cheater #98464
    menace
    Participant

    yo dys chill out. Just get a ban appeal submitted and you should be good to go. With all that league experience, I am surprised you’re getting all flustered about a getting banned from a pub. Just go play esea in the mean time.

    in reply to: New 1.6 Servers #98395
    menace
    Participant

    the suspense is killing me. <.< >.> I keep logging on, hoping its the new server, then I see the 3k/s in -_-

    in reply to: New 1.6 Servers #98343
    menace
    Participant

    anyone going to address what happened to the server? is the new one already up?

    in reply to: New Game Server #97883
    menace
    Participant

    wasn’t the old box a p4 or something?

    in reply to: New Game Server #97870
    menace
    Participant

    nice….ETA on the cs servers?

    in reply to: 1.6 Fun Maps! #97676
    menace
    Participant

    need..better…server ….NAOOOO!!

     

    Tell them they’re wasting resources by not utilizing their well invested superbox.

    in reply to: 1.6 Fun Maps! #97563
    menace
    Participant

    host another one when the new box is up and i am definitely there..to celebrate.

    in reply to: when new box comes #97487
    menace
    Participant

    Out of curiosity, what are the specs of the new server?

    in reply to: when new box comes #97448
    menace
    Participant

    and that will be…when?

    in reply to: Ban initial wall spamming in snow? #89858
    menace
    Participant

    rossy said:

    no. definitely not. this is like saying banning the awp on dust2. does not make sense at all. fy_snow is a spam/aim map… if u dont know the spams or get spammed figure it out and grow a pair

     

    First, you try to compare banning spamming on snow to banning awps on d2, which doesn’t make any sense since you claim that snow is a spam/aim map, which dust2 isnt. There’s really nothing to figure out spam wise in snow, you just point at a wall and hold down fire. The whole growing a pair comment implies that you think people are scared of spamming. No, its just god awfully annoying, especially when you spawn and try to get a weapon and end up with 10 hp without seeing anyone.

    in reply to: Changing HUD Color #89548
    menace
    Participant

    get the CSS CAL gui and there is an option during install to change your hud color.

    in reply to: Ban initial wall spamming in snow? #89464
    menace
    Participant

    d2.sticky-icky said:

    a) get out of spawn with the quickness = grab a good gun and bounce

    B) look at the walls of the other base and see where the para bullets are coming from. then you headshot them through the wall and no more spamming. DUH!

     

    a) the spawn in snow = 1/3 of the map. I think what you meant is move the center of the spawn point cause most ppl when they spam, they do it at a 45 degree angle against the wall so even if you do peek out either to the left or right, you are prone to get spammed.

     

    B) well double duh!, but that wouldn’t be fair. :]

     

     

    Thanks for the consideration guys. At least I tried.

    in reply to: Ban initial wall spamming in snow? #89435
    menace
    Participant

    I want to also mention another point about spawn killing like in scoutzknivez or awp_dust..3 second rule or slay?

    in reply to: Ban initial wall spamming in snow? #89429
    menace
    Participant

    YouWinGameOver said:

    once again not going to happen

     

    Just like you can’t enforce prohibiting crouchrunning or bunnyhopping?

     

    How would we look like assholes? It’s only a handful of ppl who do it. Its kind of like in fy_dustworld when someone spawns on an awp and kills someone right when the timer starts. Will ppl get *edited*ed if we barred that?

    in reply to: Ban initial wall spamming in snow? #89423
    menace
    Participant

    I am not expecting heavy enforcement. Just that when admins are on and playing, please post reminders and warn/kick those who keep doing it.

     

    Actually just make it para spamming.

    in reply to: CSS #89162
    menace
    Participant

    Don’t!! just don’t. Have you tried any third party mods like Neo Tokyo or Age of Chivlary?

    in reply to: Remove Italy from server #88182
    menace
    Participant

    Italy is one of those maps I don’t mind playing ct in. Same with office. What should be removed is that *edited* aztec map.

    in reply to: Your Favorite Gun #80854
    menace
    Participant

    I’d prefer ak most of the time. But if I want to run and spray random and get kills I’d get the m4.

Viewing 30 posts - 31 through 60 (of 81 total)