Liam

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 151 through 180 (of 2,063 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lockem Got Slayed! #69406
    Liam
    Spectator

    Lockem – this was dealt with. Sorry about the problem.

    in reply to: UPDATE: Meeting 1/29/2009 7PM – 10PM #69385
    Liam
    Spectator

    MasterP said:

    Did you also send a Collegiate link email?

     

    No. I don’t have access to it.

    in reply to: UPDATE: Meeting 1/29/2009 7PM – 10PM #69381
    Liam
    Spectator

    Bitey said:

    Can someone please post it up on the main page?

     

    Posted and an email was sent out.

    in reply to: Lockem Got Slayed! #69291
    Liam
    Spectator

    MajorMajorMajor said:

    Liam i searched nearly 20 logs from 9am that morning till right after the time he posted the post and I found nothing. If you do find it tell me which one it is so i can look back over?

     

     

    I use grep so I can find them faster. I’ll let you know.

    in reply to: lulz #69103
    Liam
    Spectator

    Especially considering I figured out the point slapper.

    in reply to: Bomb timer on chateu #69068
    Liam
    Spectator

    There is nothing in any of the cfg files modifying the bomb timer from its default of 30 seconds.

    in reply to: Lawlrences Thread #68969
    Liam
    Spectator

    We can debate this all day long, but the end result is that normal server admins are required to have a demo. While the Execs demo 99.9999999% of the time, they have the option to use their judgement and not record a demo.

     

    In those rare cases, the banned person may appeal this decision to the executive council. This was done and the Executives voted on it. The results are posted.

     

    We can debate this all day long, but the end result is the same. MasterP was well within his rights to ban without a demo and did so. Lawlrence appealed to the Exec committee. The Execs voted on it and decided to uphold the ban.

     

    The only reason this has been turned into such a big deal is because it was a member of rQ and 90% of the people who are dragging this out are in that clan. This situation while open to debate, is pretty cut and dry as to how it was handled.

     

    Now, lets end this issue and move on because in the end, it’s just a game.

     

    /thread

    in reply to: No respect #68944
    Liam
    Spectator

    *edited*ed or not, his attitude on here is rediculous and won’t be put up with.

    in reply to: Lawlrences Thread #68925
    Liam
    Spectator

    rainefardreamer said:

    if the council leader, or anyone had sole right to ban without demo that would imply that he is 1) capable of recognizing hax without fail and 2) implies that somehow the CL, or anyone of these positions, is more capable than the admins.

     

    he’s an elected position, and while i’m sure he has skill, his infallibilityis not something i believe in, everyone has a right to the full information put out there, in fact if you are so good at pointing out hax, i would post demos all the time, citing these as examples that we should all look at to improve ourselves as admins. as for him being more capable than the admins i dunno, but i think it’d be presumptuous and a tad arrogant to say that out of all the admins who regularly play here and watch people that we aren’t as good as watching for hax as you.

     

    Which is precisely why we have the option in to allow those bans to be appealed to the executive council.

    in reply to: Lawlrences Thread #68922
    Liam
    Spectator

    rainefardreamer said:

    whats with this new no demo rule?

     

    i thought that was crucial

     

    i side with lawlrence on grounds that no demo = no ban…show me the demo or proof of walls and i’ll be game

     

    also i think this thread being renamed to mock a player is immature

     

    Read sir.

     

    Game Server Admins, ie, you, are required to produce demos.

     

    The Executive Members can ban without a demo if they feel they have solid grounds. In that case, the banned may appeal it to the executive council, which he did. It’s being voted on.

    in reply to: No respect #68896
    Liam
    Spectator

    Willis said:

    Look you know what Ex im glad you have this nice power trip. But at the end of the day you need to Get over it. You handled the whole situation poorley. All i want is what i am owed dont just tell me to get over it. As a admin you need to handle situations better please. I hope this is the last time we have this issue and probably is because im not gonna play in a server with poor admins and poor players. Sorry to the community here because a lot of you guys are good players and good people but it just takes one in the group to ruin it.

     

    I will read more of this thread when I get home, but I’m going to be point blank.

     

    If you cannot be civil on the forums towards other members then I will gladly remove you.

     

    Everything you posted short of your original post has been rude, condescending, or threatening.

     

    Swearing at people does NOTHING. If you cannot behave and act like a mature individual then go find somewhere else to play.

    in reply to: Anonymous Submission #68858
    Liam
    Spectator

    And for the most part you are right. However, the CL is the one who runs each server.

     

    They make the judgement calls on the demos in the case of appeal.

     

    There is very, very few people who can ban without an appeal and in the most part, its not a big deal.

     

    We cannot set up a “end-all” rule where “demos are required, no matter what!”, because then, we have tied our hands in a way that we cannot get them out.

     

    The rules were voted in by the entire executive committee as is, and they won’t be changing anytime soon.

    in reply to: Lawlrences Thread #68853
    Liam
    Spectator

    lawlrence said:

    @ MasterP, I’ll repeat, just because you dont’ have to provide demos doesn’t mean you shouldn’t. Relevant. Also I’m not sure how I’m supposed to know the innerworkings of the club if I don’t go to wcu and I’m not allowed to the lans. So yes I will make mistakes about who makes what rules and who’s in charge of what. If that’s sad to you then maybe you should post a thread explaining all of it so that people will know.

     

    @Liam, I hate you =/

     

    @Lawlrence, I don’t care?

    in reply to: Lawlrences Thread #68831
    Liam
    Spectator

    See. This is what happens when you derail threads. I split them up and give them funny names. :)

    in reply to: Anonymous Submission #68821
    Liam
    Spectator

    Its setup so admins require a demo. Again Lawlrence, the CL runs the server and their word is law. You’re already getting an appeal with the Exec council.

    in reply to: Steam Sh**ted on Itself Today #68794
    Liam
    Spectator

    MajorMajorMajor said:

    So I come back home from break and have the multitudes of updates to install on my computer because being off for a month generally makes it not update. After updating, my ASUS card decides it wants to update as well, so I let it. The only differance now is that the card is running 10 degrees hotter and 4 times as loud.

     

    I tried to play L4D for a bit, and it constantly froze, went all black screen and shut down on my twice. (Before break I could play on “high” settings with no lag) I also tried to get on CSS and 1.6 and had similar issues. After trying to open a few other games, i see that I can no longer see ANY words. Don’t remember what I was doing prior to noticing the words went away, but to my knowledge

     

    So in my frustration I did uninstalled steam, defraged the computer and went to bed. Wake up, reinstalled steam and the issue is still present. Screenie for you.

     

     

    Also: all of my other steam games will not run as well. I want to blame the ASUS update, but it could just be me.

     

    Get updates here: http://www.nvidia.com

    Don’t get updates here: http://www.asus.com.tw

     

    The nvidia drivers are better all around.

    in reply to: Issues with the Server? #68790
    Liam
    Spectator

    Then maybe the times should be shortened down.

    in reply to: Buying glitch in server #68728
    Liam
    Spectator

    YahooEarth said:

    Another glitch that I noticed that the point *edited*s will be mad that I am bringing this up is that when you get a headshot you get…

     

    YahooEarth got 1 point for headshot on ___

    YahooEarth got 8 points for killing ___

    YahooEarth got 1 point for headshot on ___

     

    So you are getting an extra point on the headshots…not sure if this is something you guys control or not…and it’s not a big deal…but you know…

     

    Yeah. Its an hlstats bug.

    in reply to: Buying glitch in server #68725
    Liam
    Spectator

    MasterP said:

    You sure it’s not just taking away money for secondary gun and other accessories? Last time I tried to rebuy and it was restricted I didn’t notice it doing that.

     

    tbh, I haven’t noticed that either, but I will test it.

    in reply to: Buying glitch in server #68705
    Liam
    Spectator

    Hm, I’ll check into this.

    in reply to: Kigen’s Anti-cheat (KAC) #68662
    Liam
    Spectator

    Absolutely not.

    in reply to: Preliminary Map Cycle #68453
    Liam
    Spectator

    Pink Monkey #16 said:

    I love you Liam.

     

     

    In a completely platonic way.

     

    w00t!

    in reply to: Holy *&^%!!! #68408
    Liam
    Spectator

    moved to random

    in reply to: Preliminary Map Cycle #68378
    Liam
    Spectator

    Pink Monkey #16 said:

    Looking good so far.

     

    One suggestion…

    We aren’t really going to know how well this works until we play it some, so can we test it for two weeks or so and then throw up another official thread to see if it needs tweaking?

     

    Also, do any of these maps include automatic awp restrictions?

     

    Awps / Auto Snipers are set to a max of 2 for all maps.

    in reply to: Preliminary Map Cycle #68317
    Liam
    Spectator

    May I also suggest finding some new maps at http://www.fpsbanana.com and add a few of those instead of recycling the same maps over and over and overe? :)

    in reply to: Preliminary Map Cycle #68294
    Liam
    Spectator

    havana will kill the server.

    in reply to: Map change/vote #68232
    Liam
    Spectator

    Sure. You can also almost always catch me on IRC too. I’ll be idling #wcugaming and I’ll be idling #sourcemod too, sooooooo. ;)

    in reply to: Map change/vote #68196
    Liam
    Spectator

    So I’ve been thinking about it. I’ll code up a menu based map vote command for the admins and maybe I’ll throw a team balancer together. I have to think about the last one.

    in reply to: Lemm’s New CSS thread for Attractive People.. #68163
    Liam
    Spectator

    He cuts tot he bone. I just use a light-saber and am done with it.

    in reply to: Anonymous Submission #68097
    Liam
    Spectator

    That’s no excuse. That attitude is why you lost your admin. Straighten up or you will lose your rights to play on WCU’s servers.

     

    Have a luberly day.

Viewing 30 posts - 151 through 180 (of 2,063 total)