Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Shingi
ParticipantIT saying that they won’t open any ports is kind of silly. Main reason being is that I have gotten them to open ports before. What they won’t do is open a large range of ports (which in itself is completely stupid because their reasoning behind it is a lie) say like ports 1000-4000. I suggest that Tallgeese or Freezer go down to IT (systems) and talk with Stephen or Patrick about it. Get the exact ports that are needed, which is easy to find, and see what they say.
When doing this you should through in that it is hindering the efforts of the gaming club to not only bring together students on-campus but it would be very hard to convince prospective students to come here for the gaming club when our internet is bogged down like this.
Shingi
ParticipantSo I bought it too. Great fun.
Shingi
ParticipantI heard that game doesn’t have a LAN option that the only way you can play multiplayer is through battle.net.
Shingi
ParticipantNickname said:
Shingi said:
Nickname said:
its a pseudo puzzle game in ways though so 1st run could take waaaayyyyy longer than a second run
Does a game like that have replay value though? I mean once you solve the puzzle it’s not going to change.
i mean i replayed portal and that is essentially a puzzle game…
True, but this game seemed a bit more simple than portal. (Simple as in what you can do with the game not difficulty).
Shingi
ParticipantNickname said:
its a pseudo puzzle game in ways though so 1st run could take waaaayyyyy longer than a second run
Does a game like that have replay value though? I mean once you solve the puzzle it’s not going to change.
Shingi
ParticipantHow long did it take you to beat it? I remember reading somewhere that it was only about a 3-4 hour game.
Shingi
ParticipantI’m glad all of you approve. Thank you for the comments.
Shingi
ParticipantI added the line to the LAN event planning that AMerrill suggested. The part about the removal of an officer I didn’t change. I think two years is fine. And it doesn’t mean that they can’t be an officer for two years, it means that they just can’t hold that same position for two years (i.e. If a secretary is removed he/she can still run for another exec position.)
Shingi
ParticipantThanks for the suggestions guys. I’ll be sure to talk to the other execs about them and probably add to/edit our revision before the meeting.
Shingi
ParticipantI’m actually curious as to who you are. You say you’ve known me for quite a while but in the same post you stated that none of us probably know who you are. How are both of these things possible? Are you stalking me?
Shingi
ParticipantI’ll be there.
Shingi
ParticipantFreezer_mcs said:
BUMP
Shingi
ParticipantLol. That just made my day.
Shingi
ParticipantKaz-Ka said:
Thats fine Shingi. What aout past CLs? They could be a great asset.
See as these are just brainstorming sessions anyways it’ll be alright doing without them. We still have to address all these at a general meeting so if we happen to miss anything it can be brought up there. The reason I want it to be small is because it’s easier and much faster to revise things that way.
Shingi
ParticipantShingi said:
The idea was tossed around at the beginning of last week to do it on the weekend. It was probably going to be Sunday at least this is the day I suggested. (Yes I was the one that suggested it) But at the time it was just a suggestion. Kaz-Ka you never confirmed it so I assumed we were just going to reschedule for a later date. The cancellation of the meeting for Sunday was a surprise to me as well.
Since these constitutional meetings are even anything official I would suggest that either your or I go ahead and make weekly dates to do these meetings, preferably ever weekend. And being that they are just brainstorming sessions we do not need a full exec presence there so go ahead and make a solid day now (or soon) so there is no confusion later on.
Also on a side note: These meetings are brainstorming changes to the constitution. They need to be small and I really think that only execs and cl’s should attend. This way we still have an adequate amount of people for them but without the distraction of a lot members being there.
Kaz-ka I need you to get back to me on this. Yes, no, maybe?
February 3, 2010 at 12:11 pm in reply to: TF2 Server Information, IP/Stats/Map Cycle/ Everything You Need To Know #96874Shingi
ParticipantUpdated.
Shingi
ParticipantThat’s fine. TS3 Actually works quite well for these meetings. And hopefully from now on there will be plenty of notice as they should be the same day and time every week.
Shingi
ParticipantMasterP said:
Once a week is a great idea.
Exec/CL only is also good. I would say let alumni attend but I think maybe Adambomb would be the only other one to spend the time doing it. I don’t think he even needs to be an exception because it’s not like you’d turn him away if he showed up.
Correct. Adam would be more than welcome to any of our meetings.
Shingi
ParticipantThe idea was tossed around at the beginning of last week to do it on the weekend. It was probably going to be Sunday at least this is the day I suggested. (Yes I was the one that suggested it) But at the time it was just a suggestion. Kaz-Ka you never confirmed it so I assumed we were just going to reschedule for a later date. The cancellation of the meeting for Sunday was a surprise to me as well.
Since these constitutional meetings are even anything official I would suggest that either your or I go ahead and make weekly dates to do these meetings, preferably ever weekend. And being that they are just brainstorming sessions we do not need a full exec presence there so go ahead and make a solid day now (or soon) so there is no confusion later on.
Also on a side note: These meetings are brainstorming changes to the constitution. They need to be small and I really think that only execs and cl’s should attend. This way we still have an adequate amount of people for them but without the distraction of a lot members being there.
Shingi
ParticipantBitey said:
I would say IT is on our pocket now, but hey that is just me…
Oh I’m sure they are already trying to come up with reasons/excuses why it wasn’t their fault.
Shingi
ParticipantNo need for apologies. You did the best you could which is the only thing anyone could expect. The people that need to apologize is IT but that’s not going to happen. Thank you for getting us back to at least November Liam.
Shingi
ParticipantYa piratebay has really good deals a lot of the time.
Shingi
ParticipantApparently there is a way to do versus on the PC demo. It requires some kind of plug in though (i.e. You really aren’t supposed to do it).
Shingi
ParticipantAnother satisfied customer. Go play the game Mitch, lol.
Shingi
ParticipantThe L4D1 demo also gave you the option to do versus. Not so in L4D2 demo.
Shingi
ParticipantBut Borderlands is awesome!
Shingi
ParticipantHey it’s your choice. Just do whatever your moral guidelines tell you to do.
Shingi
Participant>.>
<.<
>.>
<.<
The game doesn’t have any kind of protection whatsoever for the PC. So people that pirated the game can play the game online and everything. It’s ridiculous. You should show support and buy the game NOT find somewhere to download it for free.
<.<
>.>
<.<
>.>
Shingi
ParticipantCould really use some more input here. Anyone that plays TF2 please respond.
Shingi
Participantpeanut said:
Hey everyone, a few questions:
1. Any difference between PC and xbox?
-I don’t have an xbox, and was looking at this game. I have been on the fence about getting a new console, but I think I will be building a new rig this winter, so I was just curious.
2. Can you pair up cross platform?
I have the game for both Console and PC and there is no difference between the two. Unfortunately you can’t cross.
-
AuthorPosts