Ephraim

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 121 through 150 (of 2,100 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Where’s Nickname? #108289
    Ephraim
    Participant

    Heeeey Major.

    in reply to: 3DS makes some people sick #108266
    Ephraim
    Participant

    I tried playing Pilotwing with one eye closed. Disappointing experience.

    in reply to: Winrar Thread #108215
    Ephraim
    Participant
    in reply to: Japan Charity tournament #108186
    Ephraim
    Participant

    MasterP said:

    Does it have to be Red Cross? They have an extremely poor track record of actually giving funds where they’re supposed to go.

     

    Wait, I thought Red Cross was one of the few charities that actually got the money to the people in Haiti. Of course, I think they also messed up the 9/11 fund…

    in reply to: Winrar Thread #108041
    Ephraim
    Participant

    Major would come back if the forums were made of chocolate amirite

    in reply to: Volition Games- Our newest sponsor! #108019
    Ephraim
    Participant

    For the last year-and-a-half, we have been without sponsors. In less than a semster, we have gotten two excellent sponsors. Great work guys!

    in reply to: Homefront #107954
    Ephraim
    Participant

    I’m thinking about picking up Homefront. The gameplay looks pretty cool and I like the storyline seems interesting. However, I’ve heard the game has received mixed reviews, so I’m not sure.

     

    One thing I find interesting is how the main villain was switched from China to North Korea. See, the game was originally supposed to be about the Chinese invading America, but the developers were afraid of offending China. What makes this interesting is that Homefront was written by John Milius, who wrote the origina Red Dawn. Recently, it was announced that Red Dawn was going to be rmade with China as the main enemy, but it was changed to North Korea during post-production, because the filmakers were afraid of losing money in the Chinese market. Basically, a movie and a video game with the same story were being developed at the same time, then altered in the same way for the same reason, and John Milius has a connection to both. Interesting.

    in reply to: Forum Section for Nintendo DS Products #107913
    Ephraim
    Participant

    I never bought a DSi. I just didn’t see enough of a jump from the Lite to justify it. However, I’m already $200 down on the 3DS. I’m feeling cautiously optimistic about it.

    in reply to: So Retarded #107903
    Ephraim
    Participant
    in reply to: Winrar Thread #107900
    Ephraim
    Participant

    That picture was drawn several years ago. It’s over 600 now.

    in reply to: Winrar Thread #107898
    Ephraim
    Participant
    in reply to: TrollFace emoticon #107881
    Ephraim
    Participant

    U MAD BRO?

    in reply to: MEETING Thursday, 8pm, UC 3/17/2011 #107860
    Ephraim
    Participant

    I have a class that usually lets out around 8:30. I might drop in to see what’s new.

    in reply to: Awesome Video Game Music Thread #107848
    Ephraim
    Participant
    in reply to: So #107804
    Ephraim
    Participant

    Bill Stickers will be prosectuted.

    in reply to: games comming soon #107754
    Ephraim
    Participant

    I’m gonna preorder Portal 2, partially because I’m sure there will be some sort of promotional TF2 item associated with it.

     

    Also, Brotherhood’s been out for a while now. It’s good.

    in reply to: I am Liam. Rawr. #107735
    Ephraim
    Participant

    I think Liam is a pretty cool guy. eH bans trolls and doesn’t afraid of anyone.

    in reply to: New webmaster and looking towards the future #107726
    Ephraim
    Participant

    It sounds like the meeting was fascinating.

    in reply to: So Retarded #107719
    Ephraim
    Participant

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZstxpTBqL0

    Wait, what just happened?

    in reply to: General Question #107718
    Ephraim
    Participant

    Nah. If you brought a console, you’d have to let everyone use it, but a headset is more for your own private use.

    in reply to: Flyer,news, info, lan, names, meeting #107679
    Ephraim
    Participant

    Last semester, the fliers went about 24 hours before the LAN. Getting them up four days in advance is an improvement.

    in reply to: Awesome Video Game Music Thread #107656
    Ephraim
    Participant
    in reply to: Random Pic Thread #107629
    Ephraim
    Participant

    Hurr Durr

    Mona.jpg

    arsenal.jpg

    hope.jpg

    king.jpg

    Hank.jpg

    squidding.jpg

    squid.jpg

    wwsd.jpg

    in reply to: Lemm’s No New Content Thread #107607
    Ephraim
    Participant

    This thread isn’t Jewish enough.

     

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwczIc4FNV0

     

    Much better.

    in reply to: Sony continues to fight dirty #107606
    Ephraim
    Participant

    Gee, I wonder what… No, no. Once is enough.

    in reply to: Lemm’s No New Content Thread #107582
    Ephraim
    Participant

    You know what? Let’s just end this conversation by joining hands and singing “Faith of the Heart”.

    in reply to: Lemm’s No New Content Thread #107576
    Ephraim
    Participant

    Hmm. I got a little concerned about the whole ‘alternate reality’ thing (because I’m a great big neeeeeeeeerd) so I decided to do a little research. I found this interview with one of Star Trek 2009’s writers. He said that despite the creation of a new timeline, the old timeline remains intact. It’s not that the old timeline was snuffed out by the new one, but rather that the new one and the old one exist simultaneously. Cool. One of my main concerns was that the creators of this film were saying that all Star Trek stories told before their movie were out of canon. Apparently, they’re not. That’s nice. I can dig the idea of a new universe, as long as respect is payed to the previous.

     

    All the same, I’m not interested in seeing the new movie because I still think it looks dumb.

     

    In Summary:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRuuF-5ZST8

    in reply to: Sony Being Sued #107571
    Ephraim
    Participant

    Gee, I wonder what Josh thinks about all this. :lol:

    in reply to: Lemm’s No New Content Thread #107570
    Ephraim
    Participant

    MasterP said:

     

    See the problem is that the original timeline has been spent. They can’t create any more TNG-based movies because the last two have been abysmal failures at the box office. The TNG crew just can’t act the parts anymore. The only place where they can safely make movies is the pre-TNG but they can’t really do that without having to tip-toe around the original backstory for the original Star Trek and we know even the slightest slip up will be noticed and boo’d in theaters. The solution? Create an alternate timeline where even if you contradict something from TOS you can write it off as the alternate character making a different decision. I mean as far as giving themselves room to maneuver, it was genious.

     

    The idea of creating a Star Trek reboot has legs to it, but I kind of see it as a betrayl to fans of the old series to say that all those stories they enjoyed never actually happened and are no longer a part of canon. Now if both continuities were still said to exist in some fashion, it would probably be easier to take. Sure it’s nerdy, but it would add a psychological comfort.

     

    All that being said, this new Star Trek universe looks too trendy for me. It’s like they’re trying to hard to be cool and not hard enough to be smart.

    in reply to: Lemm’s No New Content Thread #107558
    Ephraim
    Participant

    I didn’t mean there were more sex scenes so much as there was more sexuality in general. Again, I didn’t see the movie, but I recall the trailers playing up some scantily clad women. It seemed a bit sleazy for Star Trek, closer to a trailer for a teenage comedy than a sci-fi film.

Viewing 30 posts - 121 through 150 (of 2,100 total)