wth ? restricted weapons?

Home › Forums › Game Server Discussion › Counter-Strike: Source Discussion › wth ? restricted weapons?

Viewing 24 posts - 31 through 54 (of 54 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #16123

    Lol, sure.

     

    It means Quoted for Truth or Quite *edited*ing True

    #16136
    Mr. Freeman
    Participant

    Adam Faulkner said:

    i just read part of this thread.. When did we support restrictions? Its like saying. We pitty the noobies. wtf .. i vote to turn off restrictions. I like the guy to pick mid so i can flash him and get the easy kill. I like the guy with the auto in tspawn camping with bomb and is a disadvantage to his team.

     

    if its allowed in or at the lan then it should be here also.

     

     

    I love you.

     

     

    OBEY YOUR LEADER. TURN OFF THE *edited*NESS– erm — RESTRICTIONS!

     

    ;)

    #16142
    cerevox
    Participant

    So….The big issue is when everyone has an AWP? I can see how that would be really annoying. But when you think about it there will only be an over abundance of AWPs for a round or two. After a few rounds the other team will get some AWPs, then you will have a round where everyone has an AWP, and almost everyone dies. After that most folks won’t bother to buy another AWP because if you didn’t do well with it in the AWP fest, you are gonna go looking for a diffrent gun. In this case you could actually consider the AWP a self-limiting weapon. When there are too many everyone ends up dead, and then no one has an AWP. The only real exceptions to this are where the teams are horribly stacked and one team is just massacaring the other, but in that case it problay wouldn’t matter what weapons they are using.

     

    Long story short, the AWP itself limits how many people can use the AWP. If its an AWP fest, just wait a round or two, and things will have calmed down quite a bit.

     

    ~Killty-Chan

    #16148
    Mr. Freeman
    Participant

    cerevox said:

    So….The big issue is when everyone has an AWP? I can see how that would be really annoying. But when you think about it there will only be an over abundance of AWPs for a round or two. After a few rounds the other team will get some AWPs, then you will have a round where everyone has an AWP, and almost everyone dies. After that most folks won’t bother to buy another AWP because if you didn’t do well with it in the AWP fest, you are gonna go looking for a diffrent gun. In this case you could actually consider the AWP a self-limiting weapon. When there are too many everyone ends up dead, and then no one has an AWP. The only real exceptions to this are where the teams are horribly stacked and one team is just massacaring the other, but in that case it problay wouldn’t matter what weapons they are using.

     

    Long story short, the AWP itself limits how many people can use the AWP. If its an AWP fest, just wait a round or two, and things will have calmed down quite a bit.

     

    ~Killty-Chan

     

    You sir are a god.

     

    I love the way you see what I see and manage to put it into these… words, I think they’re called.

    #16150
    Bitey
    Participant

    freeman has a man crush on cerevox

    #16151
    gxti
    Participant

    Gah, whatever, I’ll unrestrict it you persuasive *edited*s. Autos stay because they’re stupid.

    #16155

    I think its more than a man crush :>

    #16163
    Mr. Freeman
    Participant

    Jagr said:

    I think its more than a man crush :>

     

    I no longer love him. Not after the thrashing he helped give me in CS:S today.

    #16168
    Bitey
    Participant

    lol gave it to you too hard and you couldn’t take it? kinky :P

    #16175
    Ex
    Participant

    Adam Faulkner said:

    i just read part of this thread.. When did we support restrictions? Its like saying. We pitty the noobies. wtf .. i vote to turn off restrictions. I like the guy to pick mid so i can flash him and get the easy kill. I like the guy with the auto in tspawn camping with bomb and is a disadvantage to his team.

     

    if its allowed in or at the lan then it should be here also.

     

     

    gxti said:

    Gah, whatever, I’ll unrestrict it you persuasive *edited*s. Autos stay because they’re stupid.

     

    see gxti your restricting stuff you donnt like about the game when infact it doesnt matter what you like its the schools server not your personal server to do as you see fit simple put

    #16177

    poll

    #16184
    gxti
    Participant

    Ex said:

    see gxti your restricting stuff you donnt like about the game when infact it doesnt matter what you like its the schools server not your personal server to do as you see fit simple put

    As acting co-council-leader, however, I am free to make decisions that would improve the quality of gameplay as I see fit.

    #16190
    Mr. Freeman
    Participant

    gxti said:

    As acting co-council-leader, however, I am free to make decisions that would improve the quality of gameplay as I see fit.

     

    Osnap. Toldchu!

     

    But srsly, you’re not improving the quality of anything, IMO. The game is balanced. What needs fixing (netcode and a few maps) can’t be fixed by mani-mod.

     

    Restrictions are totally unnecessary as the game’s gun-economy is just like a real life economy in that, in the end, it is self-balancing.

     

    I’m not going to cover the whole concept, though, as Cerevox has written several beautiful posts about it recently.

    #16201

    While yes “netcode” cannot be fixed by Mani or whatever, it can be improved by increasing the server’s tickrate to 100. Unfortunately the last time gxti tried this, as he told me, it ate the CPU and caused too much stress on it.

     

    Freeman, get out of Killty’s *edited* and wipe your nose :P. Killty’s posts are on the money and are basically what I’ve said in the past, just with about 500 more words.

    #16209
    gxti
    Participant

    I can try higher ticrates again.

    #16215

    /wewt

    #16216
    Adam Faulkner
    Participant

    thanks, gxti

    #16217
    Kuros
    Participant

    I’m def down with that, can Tron handle it? *challenges tron*, or are we in aphrodite? *challenges aphrodite*

    #16223
    Mr. Freeman
    Participant

    Jagr said:

    While yes “netcode” cannot be fixed by Mani or whatever, it can be improved by increasing the server’s tickrate to 100. Unfortunately the last time gxti tried this, as he told me, it ate the CPU and caused too much stress on it.

     

    Freeman, get out of Killty’s *edited* and wipe your nose :P. Killty’s posts are on the money and are basically what I’ve said in the past, just with about 500 more words.

     

    But it’s cozy here.

     

     

    gxti said:

    I can try higher ticrates again.

     

    You get 2 e-hearts!

    #16225

    Woot, thanks gxti. Now we just need people in the server to test it out :D

    #16227
    Mr. Freeman
    Participant

    Jagr said:

    Woot, thanks gxti. Now we just need people in the server to test it out :D

     

    Well, considering it’s a test, and there’s a good chance someone’s gonna get shot, I vote you Fascist.

     

    “Fascist Flakes: Touchin’ yer jibblies and takin’ yer bullitz since 1987!”™

    #16242
    cerevox
    Participant

    Jagr, my posts might have said the exact same thing as your posts, but your posts were simple staments. All you did was say, “This is what I think.” My posts, rather than simply stating my oppinion, were attempts to persuade others to my point of view. Plus people seem to think that the more you write, the more imporatant/relevant/inteligent your posts are, and since I enjoy rambling on it works out pretty well for me.

     

    ~Killty-Chan

    #16250

    My posts stated why the AWP should not be restricted and why people need to learn to avoid it, kill it, and use it. Your posts explained how it is a woman to you and how you like to *edited* the muzzle, as the spiral grooves are your kind of fetish. My posts were clear, concise, and got to the point.

     

    Freeman, it’s more like 1985 ;)

    #16263
    Mr. Freeman
    Participant

    Jagr said:

    Freeman, it’s more like 1985 ;)

     

    *edited*. I tried, mate.

     

    :P

Viewing 24 posts - 31 through 54 (of 54 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.