Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Lemm said:
If that’s the case then you should really try harder to give at least a weeks notice on your meeting times or even Two weeks… 3 days notice and having to travel on a Thursday night is a hell of a lot different than a month and a Saturday for a LAN
that is true. however it is also true the more likely a person will show up is related to how close they are.
Lieutenant Dan said:
The meetings are just as important as the LANs are.
Enough people showing up to vote a game in is the work that must be done to reap the reward of having the game at the LAN.
If you don’t work for a reward, don’t whine when you don’t get it.
(Don’t get me wrong, I am all for the rule Shingi suggested a while back of having the highest attended games voted in automatically.)
seriously. the more likely someone is to come to the meeting to vote the more likely a person will show up at the LAN. everyone can complain abotu not getting their game voted in because they live however many hours away. if they live that far away there is no way to guarantee they will show up. even with their word to many things from there to here can happen to make them not show up. however people already on campus are far more likely to show up.
Bitey said:
I can’t say you aren’t doing anything wrong, we just view this club more as a family but to you it is more of a business….whatever.
since we are playing games we want to play and having fun instead of just worrying about making the most money i dont think its being viewed as a business.
Asystole said:
I call you childish because it’s childish to vote for a game that you won’t be playing at the LAN, that won’t bring any players to the LAN, and that noone really cares about other than you console kiddies that can’t get enough tourneys so you have to spill over into the computer side.. You’re wasting time putting that on the roster, and you’re going to kill attendance.
Hell, it actually seems like you guys are just trying to mess with the computer side between wc3 at the december lan failin epicly, scheduling for Vallentines day, and now bumping cs:s for that failure that you call a game guilty gear.
Good luck
Maybe I should convince a bunch of pc gamers to get on IRC and vote for crappy console games, see how that makes you guys feel.
i may be new to the club… however the people voting for the game are people that do actually show up. guilty gear had a good turn out as opposed to the other pc games that were played. people will vote on what they want to play. if we vote in games that no one shows up for then we would waste our time. look at the lan results for the games we held.
PC TOURNAMENTS
CounterStrike Source
Cancelled due to low attendance.
Warcraft 3
Cancelled due to low attendance.
Left4Dead 2
Cancelled due to low attendance.
Team Fortress 2
Cancelled due to low attendance.
guilty gear had a great turn out and had a great competition.
also it has been stated before that valentines day was the only day we were able to get the room. if you dont like it offer ways to help instead of *edited* about it. if you cant make it we are sorry but we cant help it.
also for the others that was the reason the 3 LAN dates were planned. we can see what will work and drop one and keep to two LANs. this allows us more days to be able to book the room so we dont get a bad day such as valentines day again.
o and valentines day hurts console as much as it does computer…. sabotage yourself to hurt your enemy? doesnt really make sense to me. and who is saying they have to be enemies anyways? the only time i see this come up really are when people are hurt their favorite game doesnt get voted in and they claim they are being screwed over by (insert genre/console here). if you really want to change it show up and vote. then make sure to attend the LAN so it stays in next time.
Liquid said:
Kirby is going to get lazered and gyroed to death tomorrow, lol.
thats assuming you are even capable of making it that far! o.o lol
Anti-Ephraim said:
Great. Another noob. Find somewhere else to troll.
aww i feel special now >.>
MasterP said:
Liquid said:
Anti-Kazka was in fact a contributing member of the forums before the crash. He is not a spammer or a troll; he made that username because it’s a nickname of his. I see no legitimate reason to ban him or force a name change. Let’s not get bureaucracy in the way of our happy community.
Arguments that make sense, like that one, get you SO much further than a troll post.
The ban or account delete wasn’t going to happen because, like you said, he was a solid member.
Is his current name/title an acceptable middleground?
hehe i love it xD
Fuse said:
Liquid said:
Kirby is going to get lazered and gyroed to death tomorrow, lol.
After taking 10 mins of time 2 actually read how people thing ssbb should be played i found out… all the guys u play with blow *edited* and will be destroyed in a terrible manner tommorrow while someone behind u yells rape like a goat for 30 mins till u go slightly insane in the head and forget how to troll a forum correctly
*clears throat* rrrraaaapppeeeeeeeeee
lawlrence said:
Battlefront makes me cry. You shoot people 20 times in the head with a sniper, their head knocks back every time, yet they take no damage.
haha i never really used the sniper. ran in gun ho lol
MasterP said:
Who told you to make an anti-kazka account?
90% of the people in the CL and kaz-ka himself… though i think he said nu kaz-ka. lol
