- This topic has 22 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 3 months ago by
MasterP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 19, 2008 at 11:54 am #5070July 20, 2008 at 12:48 am #51795
pyro urban
Participanti dont get it? its not funny or anything? sorry to burst your bubble bro
July 20, 2008 at 2:57 am #51812MajorMajorMajor
Participantits not supposed to be funny…. well actually it is….in that wow thats kinda smart actually
smuggling coke under the water ::contemplates profits::
July 20, 2008 at 3:32 am #51816MasterP
ParticipantThe US has a unique solution to this sort of problem, one we discovered a century ago called “Torpedoes”. These “Torpedoes” have the ability to move, all by themselves, towards a target and can typically destroy it.
The one exception is large, heavily armored ships which may take an “assload” of firepower to sink. For all intents and purposes we can assume with a fair degree of certainty that said Columbian navy vessels do not possess the armor to survive more than a single spitwad hit from an American naval vessel, up to and including the Rowboat Class.
/Sarcasm
If you didn’t get it from my post, I think we should have sent one of our own submarines after it and sunk it.
July 20, 2008 at 1:30 pm #51834wispy
Participantdrug submirine for the loss
July 20, 2008 at 3:28 pm #51848Poopie
Participantwhy not try this cocaine? its so much cheaper!
July 20, 2008 at 3:31 pm #51849pyro urban
Participantkip it was in mexican territory i believe we cant just go in there, and thats a *edited*load of money to sink. cops sell the drugs to safe places to get cars and other things. and for drug stings
July 20, 2008 at 3:55 pm #51858MajorMajorMajor
Participantpyro urban said:
kip it was in mexican territory i believe we cant just go in therethats never stopped us before
OH BURN ON THE GOV’T
July 20, 2008 at 6:00 pm #51878pyro urban
Participantthis is true major this is true
July 20, 2008 at 10:57 pm #51900MasterP
Participantpyro urban said:
kip it was in mexican territory i believe we cant just go in there, and thats a *edited*load of money to sink. cops sell the drugs to safe places to get cars and other things. and for drug stingsArticle said:
Chertoff, who is on a three-day trip to meet with Mexican security officials, said drug cartels are increasingly relying on the subs to smuggle cocaine to the United States.U.S. officials say traffickers use the vessels to carry about 32 percent of the cocaine moved by water from South America to the U.S.
You realize it can’t dock in the US without entering US waters, right?
July 21, 2008 at 9:26 pm #51980Chris’-‘
ParticipantI was more in awe of how much coke there was
July 22, 2008 at 12:11 am #52000pyro urban
ParticipantMasterP said:
You realize it can’t dock in the US without entering US waters, right?Quote:
Jose Maria Ortegon said the 30-foot (10-meter) green submarine was equipped with GPS and a compass, and its crew had planned to drop off its shipment on Mexican shores.you realize it wasn’t headed for US waters, right? =)
July 22, 2008 at 10:55 pm #52113MasterP
Participantpyro urban said:
you realize it wasn’t headed for US waters, right? =)Article said:
Chertoff, who is on a three-day trip to meet with Mexican security officials, said drug cartels are increasingly relying on the subs to smuggle cocaine to the United States.Note they make more than 1 drug run in the lifespan of a boat. I’m willing to bet it had already been in US waters before.
July 22, 2008 at 11:03 pm #52115pyro urban
Participantwell maybe it was a first trip out for that boat. and it was headed for mexico, and no matter where it was before unless they identified it and KNEW then they can’t do anything. especially without mexican permission.
plain and simple. MEXICO =!= US
July 22, 2008 at 11:09 pm #52118Phonetically Phamous (dice
ParticipantPoopie said:
why not try this cocaine? its so much cheaper!
yeah, this was pulled off the shelf not even 1/2 year from launch. thanks to the FDA keeping us safe.
July 23, 2008 at 12:19 am #52122MajorMajorMajor
Participantpyro and masterp
give it a rest…. urban obviously didnt read the article or if he did he is very illiterate, and masterp we kno u are well versed but this was supposed to be about CRACK not technicalities
god…. to imagine what would happen if u were locked together in the same room for a day
July 23, 2008 at 12:52 am #52127pyro urban
ParticipantMajorMajorMajor said:
pyro and masterpgive it a rest…. urban obviously didnt read the article or if he did he is very illiterate, and masterp we kno u are well versed but this was supposed to be about CRACK not technicalities
god…. to imagine what would happen if u were locked together in the same room for a day
MasterP said:
The US has a unique solution to this sort of problem, one we discovered a century ago called “Torpedoes”. These “Torpedoes” have the ability to move, all by themselves, towards a target and can typically destroy it.The one exception is large, heavily armored ships which may take an “assload” of firepower to sink. For all intents and purposes we can assume with a fair degree of certainty that said Columbian navy vessels do not possess the armor to survive more than a single spitwad hit from an American naval vessel, up to and including the Rowboat Class.
/Sarcasm
If you didn’t get it from my post, I think we should have sent one of our own submarines after it and sunk it.
i replied we cant go in mexican waters without permission and he said it has to go through US waters to dock in the US, but the article says it was going from one mexican port/shore to another mexican port/shore.
so i think you are illiterate major… show me where it says in the article that this sub was going to US waters or why US should have gotten the submarine themselves. think before you speak
July 23, 2008 at 1:16 am #52132MajorMajorMajor
Participanton second thought… god help ANYONE who has to be within a mile of you at any moment.
and lol at your attempts at being intelligent
July 23, 2008 at 2:45 am #52138YahooEarth
ParticipantJust curious, but does the US or Mexico actually “own” the waters?? Or is it international waters?? And either way, trafficking(sp?) drugs is illegal in both the US and Mexico, so maybe we were just helping the good ol’ Mexicans out a lil bit…And we all know that a cut of that would eventually get to the US since it is most likely 1000% more profitable there than in Mexico…
July 23, 2008 at 6:16 pm #52182rainefardreamer
Participantcouldn’t these guys just buy a sub from the russians? seriously…it’s not like the drug kingpins are short on cash, or drugs which i’ve heard could double as cash, a nuclear submarine and a reasonably competent crew, possibly also acquire via russia, would make drug running so easy.
July 23, 2008 at 8:51 pm #52201MasterP
Participantrainefardreamer said:
couldn’t these guys just buy a sub from the russians? seriously…it’s not like the drug kingpins are short on cash, or drugs which i’ve heard could double as cash, a nuclear submarine and a reasonably competent crew, possibly also acquire via russia, would make drug running so easy.I lol at the thought of a Russian sub in US waters. We can track heat signatures of nuclear subs with satallites when they are docked so using them would raise a lot of eyebrows. The US claims dominance over waters within a certain radius of US territory. It used to be like 3 miles but after 9/11 it got increased by quite a bit. Idk what it is now, 20 miles I believe.
Btw Urban, Colombia isn’t a Mexican city/port/shore/territory.
July 23, 2008 at 8:55 pm #52202Phonetically Phamous (dice
Participanteverything south of texes (toast (umm)) is Mexico duh
July 23, 2008 at 9:10 pm #52205MasterP
ParticipantDice said:
everything south of texes (toast (umm)) is Mexico duhAntarctica has Mexicans?
That’s like 2 objects occupying the same spot in space/time.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.