- This topic has 31 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 10 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
No recoil
“Rofl” 1621 STEAM_0:0:21153242 15 12:33 57 0
Demo Atached. Please Review And ban, and if have to place in the correct Forum.
You couldn’t get an admin? I recall there being a rule that we can’t accept demos from non-admins. It doesn’t mean we can’t watch out for him, but I don’t think we can ban using a demo you recorded.
In all honesty, that rule is absolutely, 100% retarded.
EDIT: I can kind of see some logic behind it
lockEm said:
In all honesty, that rule is absolutely, 100% retarded.It’s there for a very, VERY, VERY good reason and only the CL can override it in the extremest of circumstances. That demo better be *edited* good if you expect a ban.
MasterP said:
It’s there for a very, VERY, VERY good reason and only the CL can override it in the extremest of circumstances. That demo better be *edited* good if you expect a ban.Care to tell me about it?
The reason that demos from any non admin can’t be used is because they could easily get a friend to go on under that person’s alias, use some hacks, take a demo, and submit it for a ban. Without an admin taking the demo, there’s no way to know if it’s really the right person or not. (This is what I believe is correct, right MasterP?)
obvious no recoil..acidak type snapshot in console after typing status with the guys name and steamid highlighted for better proof. Can’t just take your word that that is the right id. get on IRC..or DL it. mIRC <– google
MERRY CHRISTMAS AND TO ALL A GOOD NIGHT. sorry, just felt like saying that and i think that would basically solve the problem. Seeing as you’d have to go to tons of trouble to change the numbers to the persons steamid. To me, that would be like someone with NO LYFE and knows something about photoshop or some *edited*.
I don’t like the rule myself but i see that the uses far outweigh the negatives.
True, but I could take a screenshot of the actual person’s steamid and then have someone change their name to his and make a false demo later on. I’m sure there are ways of verifying whether the screenshot is real and whatnot, but who’s going to go through the trouble every time a non-admin posts a screenshot and demo?
I can’t think of anyone who plays in our servers who’ll want to frame someone else, but I don’t think this rule was created just because. I dunno, the way MasterP responded sounded like it’s here because of something that’s happened in the past.
I think it’d be helpful if other people got demos to help out the admins, but at the same time, if this rule was put into effect because of something that occurred before, we’re avoiding repeating that situation.
listen what matters is that the kid tried to spot a hacker he took a demo and it clearly went under review because people talked about it. END THREAD.
YouWinGameOver said:
listen what matters is that the kid tried to spot a hacker he took a demo and it clearly went under review because people talked about it. END THREAD.Yeah, some admins watched it, but so what? You overlooked the part where we can’t do anything about it. Like I already said, we can look out for the guy, but we can’t use his demo unless, as MasterP said, the CL decides to. Major hasn’t commented yet, so yeah, we can’t do anything. A couple of admins reviewing it means nothing if the higher ups don’t see it.
Generally we do not accept demos of hackers except from admins. When hackers are on and an admin cannot be reached, i do encourage people to get demos of them and bring them to us. It does not mean we can ban JUST because of this demo, but it gives us an idea of what to look for, especially if we get a steam ID.
My opinion… watch for said “ROFL” and if the admin spec-ing thinks there are hacks, do it. We cannot ban just because of someone elses demo.
sir yes sir if i see em ill watch and see what happens sorry i wasnt on i usually am but its xmas and also spending time wit fam
torankusu said:
Yeah, some admins watched it, but so what? You overlooked the part where we can’t do anything about it. Like I already said, we can look out for the guy, but we can’t use his demo unless, as MasterP said, the CL decides to. Major hasn’t commented yet, so yeah, we can’t do anything. A couple of admins reviewing it means nothing if the higher ups don’t see it.Thats what I was getting to. He tried to do something about someone he thought was hacking. I didn’t overlook the part that we cant do anything because we can. Try being more alert and now we have something to look over as Major said.
YouWinGameOver said:
Thats what I was getting to. He tried to do something about someone he thought was hacking. I didn’t overlook the part that we cant do anything because we can. Try being more alert and now we have something to look over as Major said.That’s exactly what I said, twice.
And when I meant we can’t do anything, I meant BAN. I said it twice that we can watch out for this guy.
It seems like we have a problem of misinterpreting like every other reply that is posted.
We should make a how-to on how to properly reply. I am in the process of making an online class just for that. I’ll be charging 10 dollars a session. The first session starts now and is free.
Session 1: Sarcasm
Re-read this post until you can fully see the sarcasm in my text. Visualization is key.
.cb new_rayz said:
Session 1: SarcasmRe-read this post until you can fully see the sarcasm in my text. Visualization is key.
wot dat mean?
MajorMajorMajor said:
wot dat mean?lol i was just pointing out how easily reading something can be misinterpreted. I was totally being sarcastic about the whole idea, but at the same time serious. It reads like I am dead serious, when I am really not. Or how I think your question is genuine, but you are prolly just joking.
That’s really about it, in other words I was being an idiot.
.cb new_rayz said:
That’s really about it, in other words I was being an idiot.lol… well we already KNEW that….
>_>
- The topic ‘Please ban, I have proof.’ is closed to new replies.