- This topic has 19 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 5 months ago by
Pink Monkey #16.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 16, 2007 at 7:10 pm #2036
Deathspirit
ParticipantThis one is the beginning to my cheat
How is this my cheat might you ask? Well because I will post on and on making a conversation to myself
Interesting
Hm if i keep replying to myself it never gives me a new reply window. but does my post count increase?
No it doesnt. You outsmarted me.
Well someone care to help me?
March 16, 2007 at 7:51 pm #18223Deathspirit
ParticipantDeathspirit said:
This one is the beginning to my cheatHow is this my cheat might you ask? Well because I will post on and on making a conversation to myself
Interesting
Hm if i keep replying to myself it never gives me a new reply window. but does my post count increase?
No it doesnt. You outsmarted me.
Well someone care to help me?
Can I reply to my own posts this way?
Deathspirit said:
Can I reply to my own posts this way?Yes but this is very strange
Is this better?
Deathspirit said:
Can I reply to my own posts this way?Yes but this is very strange
Is this better?
I guess I haveta the quote at the top to get a new post then?
Deathspirit said:
Can I reply to my own posts this way?Yes but this is very strange
Is this better?
I guess I haveta the quote at the top to get a new post then?
No that didnt work
Deathspirit said:
This one is the beginning to my cheatHow is this my cheat might you ask? Well because I will post on and on making a conversation to myself
Interesting
Hm if i keep replying to myself it never gives me a new reply window. but does my post count increase?
No it doesnt. You outsmarted me.
Well someone care to help me?
Ok this is now attempt 3. I dont understand how I got the FIRST reply window. I tested– if this fails below– but if it succeeds above. Ill explain. My first idea was to continue posting to myself. But it didnt work: Then I did something. I attempted to quote the first post and reply and it worked. However subsequent attempts to do the same thing havent worked to the second post. Which is explained in my reaction. Where that explanation is located is the purpose behind this test. Now I make the test to see if a reply to the first post will give me a third one. If it fails to this text will appear ABOVE post #2 but if it succeeds BELOW post #2 or rather this post will appear as post #3
Deathspirit said:
Can I reply to my own posts this way?Yes but this is very strange
Is this better?
I guess I haveta the quote at the top to get a new post then?
No that didnt work
Ok this is now attempt 3. I dont understand how I got the FIRST reply window. I tested– if this fails below– but if it succeeds above. Ill explain. My first idea was to continue posting to myself. But it didnt work: Then I did something. I attempted to quote the first post and reply and it worked. However subsequent attempts to do the same thing havent worked to the second post. Which is explained in my reaction. Where that explanation is located is the purpose behind this test. Now I make the test to see if a reply to the first post will give me a third one. If it fails to this text will appear ABOVE post #2 but if it succeeds BELOW post #2 or rather this post will appear as post #3
I assumed too much: However subsequent attempts to do the same thing havent worked to the second post. Let me explain. I clicked on REPLY to post #2 but instead as you can see at the beginning of post #2 it only came up as continuous diggings into it. So in attempt #3 I attempted to reply to post #1. As you see post #3 attempt in fact appeared in post #2 it failed. This is another attempt to reply to the second post quoting the above text.
Deathspirit said:
Can I reply to my own posts this way?Yes but this is very strange
Is this better?
I guess I haveta the quote at the top to get a new post then?
No that didnt work
Ok this is now attempt 3. I dont understand how I got the FIRST reply window. I tested– if this fails below– but if it succeeds above. Ill explain. My first idea was to continue posting to myself. But it didnt work: Then I did something. I attempted to quote the first post and reply and it worked. However subsequent attempts to do the same thing havent worked to the second post. Which is explained in my reaction. Where that explanation is located is the purpose behind this test. Now I make the test to see if a reply to the first post will give me a third one. If it fails to this text will appear ABOVE post #2 but if it succeeds BELOW post #2 or rather this post will appear as post #3
I assumed too much: However subsequent attempts to do the same thing havent worked to the second post. Let me explain. I clicked on REPLY to post #2 but instead as you can see at the beginning of post #2 it only came up as continuous diggings into it. So in attempt #3 I attempted to reply to post #1. As you see post #3 attempt in fact appeared in post #2 it failed. This is another attempt to reply to the second post quoting the above text.
This is attempt #5 Wow im kinda, we’ll call it, drunk so my attempt#4 is kinda worded funny. Does anyone else understand what I just said?
Deathspirit said:
This one is the beginning to my cheatHow is this my cheat might you ask? Well because I will post on and on making a conversation to myself
Interesting
Hm if i keep replying to myself it never gives me a new reply window. but does my post count increase?
No it doesnt. You outsmarted me.
Well someone care to help me?
Test #6?
Deathspirit said:
Can I reply to my own posts this way?Yes but this is very strange
Is this better?
I guess I haveta the quote at the top to get a new post then?
No that didnt work
Ok this is now attempt 3. I dont understand how I got the FIRST reply window. I tested– if this fails below– but if it succeeds above. Ill explain. My first idea was to continue posting to myself. But it didnt work: Then I did something. I attempted to quote the first post and reply and it worked. However subsequent attempts to do the same thing havent worked to the second post. Which is explained in my reaction. Where that explanation is located is the purpose behind this test. Now I make the test to see if a reply to the first post will give me a third one. If it fails to this text will appear ABOVE post #2 but if it succeeds BELOW post #2 or rather this post will appear as post #3
I assumed too much: However subsequent attempts to do the same thing havent worked to the second post. Let me explain. I clicked on REPLY to post #2 but instead as you can see at the beginning of post #2 it only came up as continuous diggings into it. So in attempt #3 I attempted to reply to post #1. As you see post #3 attempt in fact appeared in post #2 it failed. This is another attempt to reply to the second post quoting the above text.
This is attempt #5 Wow im kinda, we’ll call it, drunk so my attempt#4 is kinda worded funny. Does anyone else understand what I just said?
Test #6?
#7 this is getting lame.
March 16, 2007 at 7:52 pm #18224gxti
ParticipantPRO TIP: It’s based on time.
March 16, 2007 at 7:57 pm #18225Deathspirit
Participantgxti said:
PRO TIP: It’s based on time.How much time?
Deathspirit said:
How much time?20 seconds?
gxti said:
PRO TIP: It’s based on time.1 min?
Deathspirit said:
How much time?20 seconds?
1 min?
I posted somewhere else so this is #8
Deathspirit said:
How much time?
20 seconds?
1 min?
I posted somewhere else so this is #8
Didnt give it enough time
March 17, 2007 at 8:52 pm #18291Deathspirit
ParticipantHaha a day should work
Deathspirit said:
Haha a day should workIt did
Deathspirit said:
Haha a day should workIt did
but not a reply to my reply. Will test the water in 10 mins
March 17, 2007 at 9:47 pm #18295Falcon
ParticipantDeathspirit said:
but not a reply to my reply. Will test the water in 10 mins….. late
April 9, 2007 at 10:03 am #19544
Adam FaulknerParticipantodd thread!
April 9, 2007 at 3:42 pm #19579Phonetically Phamous (dice
Participantit appears that he has stoped posting….. he has failed us epiciealy
April 13, 2007 at 5:27 pm #19849lootool
Participant
7 frags is good for me…LOOTOOL!April 17, 2007 at 10:28 am #20003ak_21
ParticipantYeah what u did is kinda stupid what ever u got somany posts
April 17, 2007 at 7:01 pm #20041Bitey
ParticipantWhat?
April 18, 2007 at 9:42 am #20066Falcon
ParticipantDeathspirit said:
Will test the water in 10 minsHow late is this clown waiting? 10 minutes was a WAAAAY long time ago
April 19, 2007 at 11:22 am #20116Nickname
ParticipantThis looks like the kind of crazy thread I should post in to get my post count up… might get Kuros off my case
April 19, 2007 at 3:35 pm #20131Kuros
ParticipantHA! Never…
EDIT: Maybe if you posted in “Just Saying Hi” in the CS:S forum. Then maybe we can talk…
last edited by The President: 8:29pm 4.19.07
April 19, 2007 at 7:34 pm #20145Phonetically Phamous (dice
ParticipantYea. kuros He should def post in teh “Just Sayin Hi” thred
Last edit by CooRoss 8:30 pm 4-19-07
April 19, 2007 at 8:54 pm #20154Falcon
Participantwuh-oh…
RUN AWAY!!!
April 19, 2007 at 11:23 pm #20161Bitey
ParticipantOH NOES ITS DA ADMIN WARZ!!!
April 20, 2007 at 2:45 pm #20179ak_21
ParticipantDeathspirit said:
Can I reply to my own posts this way?Yes but this is very strange
Is this better?
I guess I haveta the quote at the top to get a new post then?
No that didnt work
Ok this is now attempt 3. I dont understand how I got the FIRST reply window. I tested– if this fails below– but if it succeeds above. Ill explain. My first idea was to continue posting to myself. But it didnt work: Then I did something. I attempted to quote the first post and reply and it worked. However subsequent attempts to do the same thing havent worked to the second post. Which is explained in my reaction. Where that explanation is located is the purpose behind this test. Now I make the test to see if a reply to the first post will give me a third one. If it fails to this text will appear ABOVE post #2 but if it succeeds BELOW post #2 or rather this post will appear as post #3
I assumed too much: However subsequent attempts to do the same thing havent worked to the second post. Let me explain. I clicked on REPLY to post #2 but instead as you can see at the beginning of post #2 it only came up as continuous diggings into it. So in attempt #3 I attempted to reply to post #1. As you see post #3 attempt in fact appeared in post #2 it failed. This is another attempt to reply to the second post quoting the above text.
This is attempt #5 Wow im kinda, we’ll call it, drunk so my attempt#4 is kinda worded funny. Does anyone else understand what I just said?
Test #6?
#7 this is getting lame.
what the hell ur stupid how long did it take u to type all of this, anyways kinda cool(not)
April 30, 2007 at 5:45 pm #20569Pink Monkey #16
Participantthis is random
May 6, 2007 at 5:55 pm #20761Pink Monkey #16
Participanttime to post somemore
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.