Cheater in the source server

[lawlrence]

As the description says there was a player walling in the server. His steam id is 0:1:4020736 and this is a demo of him.

http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=8b5f20f…04e75f6e8ebb871

The sketchiest parts are awping mid ct side and watch with mat_wireframe 3 on for full effect.

[XRAY]

lulz i dont know if you dont know this but an admin has to be there to demo and ban the person…

[MajorMajorMajor]

Thank you for bringing this up!

 

Currently, while the demo you made may be excellent and show him BLATANTLY hacking, we still cannot allow demos from people other than admins. But even though we do not accept the demos You got us the steam ID and he will we on watch for him to pop back in the server. If you see him on again, please contact us again via forums/IRC/ or steam friends. I’m usually on IRC and would be happy to find an admin to help you out or you can add me: ctptrick19 and I will be able to help faster.

[Phonetically Phamous (dice]

MajorMajorMajor said:

Thank you for bringing this up!

 

Currently, while the demo you made may be excellent and show him BLATANTLY hacking, we still cannot allow demos from people other than admins.

 

i forgot was this a liam policy?

 

if demos shows hacking in our server, if they type status in consul and show steam id, i see zero reason why to not add that id to the list?

 

they can always appeal…………….

[MajorMajorMajor]

NoDice said:

i forgot was this a liam policy?

 

if demos shows hacking in our server, if they type status in consul and show steam id, i see zero reason why to not add that id to the list?

 

they can always appeal…………….

I mean the policy never got changed, so I assumed we still did not accept them. We could vote in a new policy if need be….

[Pink Monkey #5]

Time for an exec discussion…

[Kuros]

My policy was not to accept them unless they were blatant and not a regular (to make sure it’s not a rage ban). If it’s blatant, banhammer time.

[MajorMajorMajor]

Kuros said:

My policy was not to accept them unless they were blatant and not a regular (to make sure it’s not a rage ban). If it’s blatant, banhammer time.

I agree, if its blatent, there should be a ban, I just think that a finalised ruling would be helpful in the future. Consistency is key

[Bitey]

My reasoning for ruling against accepting demos from other people is because all demos can be altered and changed, so I think like Kuros if the hacking is blatent and they are NOT a regular then ban hammer away.

[Author]

Posts