banned sprays

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 45 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #7365
    Bananarchy
    Participant

    So, a minor issue, but I am curious to get everyones’ opinion. Lacking from the list of banned sprays are those that resemble terrorist or counter-terrorists (often they are animooted). I know they are banned in the 1.6 server, and think we should have a discussion about whether they should be allowed on the CSS servers.

     

    Basically the strongest argument I can think of against these is that it confers a non-skill based advantage to some players over others. I personally don’t know anyone who is killed because of these sprays that has an overwhelming feeling of justice afterward. Anyway, what are your opinions? Anyone have other arguments for or against?

    #82325
    peanut
    Participant

    My opinion is that it was *edited*ing you off and you kept shooting it, and kept getting killed. To be honest it happened to me like 3 rounds in a row. Someone had a pretty good one on tonight. It was inferno at the ct awp spot near apartments. Silly me. I would be fine with having admins ask that kind of spray not to be sprayed. but i think we had this conversation once before.

    #82326
    Dean Winchester
    Participant

    i say they should be banned in the source server also.

     

    i think the most i’ve ever been angered by them is on the roof of piranesi. when you’re a T and rushing to the roof and theres a animated spray of someone shooting at you from the other side…lol

     

    they distract and do more harm than good.

    #82338
    YahooEarth
    Participant

    It’s a *edited* spray…who the eff cares…as long as their aren’t tits…or vag…

    #82341
    Pink Monkey #13
    Participant

    i agree with dean. i think they should be banned. however, i do believe we’ve had this discussion before and it ended up with them not being banned.

    #82351
    distemper
    Participant

    I have to agree with Bananarchy, and say that sprays like that do confer an unfair advantage to certain players, simply because of the fact that in CS:S, it can be difficult to discern the identity of distant objects.

    #82352
    Kuros
    Participant

    They were banned when I was prez.

    #82356
    newrayz
    Participant

    YahooEarth said:

    It’s a *edited* spray…who the eff cares…as long as their aren’t tits…or vag…

     

     

    so you would rather look at *edited* and balls?

     

     

    fruit. >.>

    #82357
    Citan001
    Participant

    I was under the impression animated sprays were banned here as well. I have been enforcing this along with a lot of other admins as well.

    #82372
    Kuros
    Participant

    Citan001 said:

    I was under the impression animated sprays were banned here as well. I have been enforcing this along with a lot of other admins as well.

     

    Animated sprays are okay. Animated or nonanimated sprays of Ts, CTs, VIPs(1.6) or the bomb are NOT allowed.

    #82373
    PeterBeater
    Participant

    i’m just looking for some consistancy here.

     

    if you are going to have rules in your server that constitute ‘fair play’ (i.e. to planting in water, no stealing defuses, no defusing through floors, etc), then it seems logical that the sprays would be banned.

     

    they are decoys… distractions meant to divert your attention for a moment while you get killed.

    #82392
    MasterP
    Participant

    Decoy sprays were discussed a while back and the general consensus was they should be allowed.

     

    We can revisit this if there’s enough call to but I hate to make policy based on 1 single player’s spray. 99.99% of decoy sprays are absolutely terrible and can be easily seen as a spray.

    #82394
    Citan001
    Participant

    See I was told they were not allowed period.

    #82395
    MasterP
    Participant

    I’ll try to dig up the old thread.

    #82397
    Citan001
    Participant

    MasterP said:

    I’ll try to dig up the old thread.

     

    Its cool I will take your word for it since your the cl and all. I would just like to say that I wish they were banned because they are annoying and yes call me blind/stupid but yeah I have shot at these things and gotten killed by someone hiding using that as bait.

    #82398
    lootool
    Participant

    wut duz CAL say??? LOOT.

    #82403
    Citan001
    Participant

    lootool said:

    wut duz CAL say??? LOOT.

     

    Does it matter what CAL says? We have never done anything because CAL says its alright…..

    #82406
    Bananarchy
    Participant

    Sorry to bring up an old topic :o If this is a moot issue I won’t pursue it further.

     

    Also, yes Penut, I did rage at that guys spray the other day. :lol: However, I do have the depth of understanding to recognize that one isolated incident should not guide clan policy. That being said, they still raise the issue of fairness, and, if they are as isolated as you suggest, having them banned should not cause too many problems.

     

    It does seem like views are mixed, however, and as someone said, if there is enough of a consensus, perhaps this issue is worth revisiting.

     

    Quote:

    Does it matter what CAL says? We have never done anything because CAL says its alright…..

     

    Behold, Citan! MASTER of sarcasm….

    #82407
    MasterP
    Participant

    Citan001 said:

    Does it matter what CAL says?

    Nope.

     

    Also remember that I will never punish or flame you for calling out a problem you think a server is having so long as it is legitimately a problem.

     

    For example:

    Problem: server exploit

    Problem: decoy sprays

    Not a Problem: poor registry with a 200 ping and 50 choke

    #82409
    Citan001
    Participant

    MasterP said:

    Nope.

     

    lol though so. I guess we do need to bring this topic back up…

    #82440
    Kuros
    Participant

    It was never allowed in the past but ultimately it’s Kip’s decision.

    #82480
    Bitey
    Participant

    Yeah I didn’t allow it either..

    #82488
    Citan001
    Participant

    I dunno if this is something the cls need to discuss the regular players or the admins or what but um someone who knows the answer can ya do a poll so we can see what peeps think?

    #82496
    YahooEarth
    Participant

    As of right this second, the answer is that the are legal, per what was discussed a while ago with Kip…

     

    And as usual, no one believed me when I was telling everyone that they were legal, along with the bogus 3 second rule that peeps believe exists…

    #82497
    Citan001
    Participant

    that is fine yahoo but maybe its time we go back and look at those rules maybe its time for a change?

    #82504
    Dean Winchester
    Participant

    i actually want the three second rule back…imo

    #82546
    crazy_horse
    Participant

    if your still reading this thread… go to the poll

    #82620
    PeterBeater
    Participant

    just to clarify: that 3 second rule is bs?

    #82622
    king kong
    Participant

    i would agree with yahoo…its just sprays as long as its not porn then it should be fine.

    #82625
    MasterP
    Participant

    Bitey said:

    Yeah I didn’t allow it either..

    Yes you did.

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 45 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.