Home › Forums › Game Server Discussion › Counter-Strike: Source Discussion › banned sprays
- This topic has 44 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 6 months ago by
MasterP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 25, 2009 at 12:39 am #7365
Bananarchy
ParticipantSo, a minor issue, but I am curious to get everyones’ opinion. Lacking from the list of banned sprays are those that resemble terrorist or counter-terrorists (often they are animooted). I know they are banned in the 1.6 server, and think we should have a discussion about whether they should be allowed on the CSS servers.
Basically the strongest argument I can think of against these is that it confers a non-skill based advantage to some players over others. I personally don’t know anyone who is killed because of these sprays that has an overwhelming feeling of justice afterward. Anyway, what are your opinions? Anyone have other arguments for or against?
April 25, 2009 at 12:44 am #82325peanut
ParticipantMy opinion is that it was *edited*ing you off and you kept shooting it, and kept getting killed. To be honest it happened to me like 3 rounds in a row. Someone had a pretty good one on tonight. It was inferno at the ct awp spot near apartments. Silly me. I would be fine with having admins ask that kind of spray not to be sprayed. but i think we had this conversation once before.
April 25, 2009 at 12:45 am #82326Dean Winchester
Participanti say they should be banned in the source server also.
i think the most i’ve ever been angered by them is on the roof of piranesi. when you’re a T and rushing to the roof and theres a animated spray of someone shooting at you from the other side…lol
they distract and do more harm than good.
April 25, 2009 at 2:02 am #82338YahooEarth
ParticipantIt’s a *edited* spray…who the eff cares…as long as their aren’t tits…or vag…
April 25, 2009 at 2:51 am #82341Pink Monkey #13
Participanti agree with dean. i think they should be banned. however, i do believe we’ve had this discussion before and it ended up with them not being banned.
April 25, 2009 at 10:47 am #82351distemper
ParticipantI have to agree with Bananarchy, and say that sprays like that do confer an unfair advantage to certain players, simply because of the fact that in CS:S, it can be difficult to discern the identity of distant objects.
April 25, 2009 at 11:51 am #82352Kuros
ParticipantThey were banned when I was prez.
April 25, 2009 at 12:33 pm #82356newrayz
ParticipantYahooEarth said:
It’s a *edited* spray…who the eff cares…as long as their aren’t tits…or vag…so you would rather look at *edited* and balls?
fruit. >.>
April 25, 2009 at 12:37 pm #82357Citan001
ParticipantI was under the impression animated sprays were banned here as well. I have been enforcing this along with a lot of other admins as well.
April 25, 2009 at 1:30 pm #82372Kuros
ParticipantCitan001 said:
I was under the impression animated sprays were banned here as well. I have been enforcing this along with a lot of other admins as well.Animated sprays are okay. Animated or nonanimated sprays of Ts, CTs, VIPs(1.6) or the bomb are NOT allowed.
April 25, 2009 at 1:34 pm #82373PeterBeater
Participanti’m just looking for some consistancy here.
if you are going to have rules in your server that constitute ‘fair play’ (i.e. to planting in water, no stealing defuses, no defusing through floors, etc), then it seems logical that the sprays would be banned.
they are decoys… distractions meant to divert your attention for a moment while you get killed.
April 25, 2009 at 2:30 pm #82392MasterP
ParticipantDecoy sprays were discussed a while back and the general consensus was they should be allowed.
We can revisit this if there’s enough call to but I hate to make policy based on 1 single player’s spray. 99.99% of decoy sprays are absolutely terrible and can be easily seen as a spray.
April 25, 2009 at 2:41 pm #82394Citan001
ParticipantSee I was told they were not allowed period.
April 25, 2009 at 2:56 pm #82395MasterP
ParticipantI’ll try to dig up the old thread.
April 25, 2009 at 2:59 pm #82397Citan001
ParticipantMasterP said:
I’ll try to dig up the old thread.Its cool I will take your word for it since your the cl and all. I would just like to say that I wish they were banned because they are annoying and yes call me blind/stupid but yeah I have shot at these things and gotten killed by someone hiding using that as bait.
April 25, 2009 at 3:09 pm #82398lootool
Participantwut duz CAL say??? LOOT.
April 25, 2009 at 3:15 pm #82403Citan001
Participantlootool said:
wut duz CAL say??? LOOT.Does it matter what CAL says? We have never done anything because CAL says its alright…..
April 25, 2009 at 3:20 pm #82406Bananarchy
ParticipantSorry to bring up an old topic
If this is a moot issue I won’t pursue it further. Also, yes Penut, I did rage at that guys spray the other day.
However, I do have the depth of understanding to recognize that one isolated incident should not guide clan policy. That being said, they still raise the issue of fairness, and, if they are as isolated as you suggest, having them banned should not cause too many problems.It does seem like views are mixed, however, and as someone said, if there is enough of a consensus, perhaps this issue is worth revisiting.
Quote:
Does it matter what CAL says? We have never done anything because CAL says its alright…..Behold, Citan! MASTER of sarcasm….
April 25, 2009 at 3:20 pm #82407MasterP
ParticipantCitan001 said:
Does it matter what CAL says?Nope.
Also remember that I will never punish or flame you for calling out a problem you think a server is having so long as it is legitimately a problem.
For example:
Problem: server exploit
Problem: decoy sprays
Not a Problem: poor registry with a 200 ping and 50 choke
April 25, 2009 at 3:22 pm #82409Citan001
ParticipantMasterP said:
Nope.lol though so. I guess we do need to bring this topic back up…
April 25, 2009 at 6:30 pm #82440Kuros
ParticipantIt was never allowed in the past but ultimately it’s Kip’s decision.
April 25, 2009 at 8:52 pm #82480Bitey
ParticipantYeah I didn’t allow it either..
April 25, 2009 at 9:07 pm #82488Citan001
ParticipantI dunno if this is something the cls need to discuss the regular players or the admins or what but um someone who knows the answer can ya do a poll so we can see what peeps think?
April 25, 2009 at 9:14 pm #82496YahooEarth
ParticipantAs of right this second, the answer is that the are legal, per what was discussed a while ago with Kip…
And as usual, no one believed me when I was telling everyone that they were legal, along with the bogus 3 second rule that peeps believe exists…
April 25, 2009 at 9:16 pm #82497Citan001
Participantthat is fine yahoo but maybe its time we go back and look at those rules maybe its time for a change?
April 25, 2009 at 9:54 pm #82504Dean Winchester
Participanti actually want the three second rule back…imo
April 26, 2009 at 3:04 am #82546crazy_horse
Participantif your still reading this thread… go to the poll
April 26, 2009 at 2:53 pm #82620PeterBeater
Participantjust to clarify: that 3 second rule is bs?
April 26, 2009 at 2:56 pm #82622king kong
Participanti would agree with yahoo…its just sprays as long as its not porn then it should be fine.
April 26, 2009 at 3:06 pm #82625MasterP
ParticipantBitey said:
Yeah I didn’t allow it either..Yes you did.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.