Home › Forums › Game Server Discussion › Counter-Strike: Source Discussion › Aztec
- This topic has 50 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 5 months ago by
Bitey.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 18, 2008 at 8:10 am #46484
BallzinurJawz
ParticipantI am trying to imagine an aztec w/ no awps…OMG, I think it will be a fun map to play!??!!
Yes, ban awps
May 18, 2008 at 11:26 am #46495Liam
ParticipantAwps are gone from aztec.
May 18, 2008 at 1:35 pm #46508BallzinurJawz
ParticipantLiam said:
Awps are gone from aztec.
Woot!
<3 Liam
May 18, 2008 at 3:04 pm #46520Nic Meloney
ParticipantAWP Restrictions are a good idea on any map in my opinion. Or, better yet – restrict the people who USE the AWP on a regular basis.
and by restrict I mean molest and murder.
May 18, 2008 at 3:44 pm #46522YahooEarth
ParticipantGONE FOREVER!?!?!?!?
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
May 18, 2008 at 3:45 pm #46523YahooEarth
ParticipantThere was also no option to vote for restricting tha awp!! UNFAIR VOTE, I call for a revote with an option for restrict the awp and not ban it…
May 18, 2008 at 4:49 pm #46528Pink Monkey #13
ParticipantBallzRawlz said:
Woot!<3 Liam
yay liam! *queues the band*
Nic Meloney said:
AWP Restrictions are a good idea on any map in my opinion. Or, better yet – restrict the people who USE the AWP on a regular basis.and by restrict I mean molest and murder.
hahaha. i agree with nic
May 18, 2008 at 5:00 pm #46529pyro urban
Participantdoes this restriction apply for 1.6 as well?
and t’s can use a map just like a ct can. in the water, on the bridge, or by the DD
May 19, 2008 at 12:00 am #46574MasterP
ParticipantIs this really necessary? Why not limit it to 2 per team? Just because Ts don’t know how to play the map doesn’t mean you need to rebalance the map for them. It means they need to quit being retarded and play smarter.
All Ts need is 1 GOOD AWPer and a jump/decoy and you can take out 3-5 CT AWPers. I know, I’ve done it. It’s not that hard.
May 19, 2008 at 12:07 am #46575Liam
ParticipantMasterP said:
Is this really necessary? Why not limit it to 2 per team? Just because Ts don’t know how to play the map doesn’t mean you need to rebalance the map for them. It means they need to quit being retarded and play smarter.All Ts need is 1 GOOD AWPer and a jump/decoy and you can take out 3-5 CT AWPers. I know, I’ve done it. It’s not that hard.
Is anyone else sick of Aztec turning into a awp map
I love aztec!!! [ 6 ] [23.08%]
Only if you banned the Awps [ 13 ] [50.00%]
Dont Care [ 2 ] [7.69%]
Its Gotta Go! [ 5 ] [19.23%]
Just did what the public wanted.
May 19, 2008 at 12:08 am #46578Pink Monkey #13
ParticipantMasterP said:
Is this really necessary? Why not limit it to 2 per team? Just because Ts don’t know how to play the map doesn’t mean you need to rebalance the map for them. It means they need to quit being retarded and play smarter.All Ts need is 1 GOOD AWPer and a jump/decoy and you can take out 3-5 CT AWPers. I know, I’ve done it. It’s not that hard.
it’s just TOOO easy isn’t it? lol.
but srsly. i hate aztec turning into an awp map, and i always auto assign, so i ALWAYS get T.
May 19, 2008 at 12:12 am #46580YahooEarth
ParticipantAgain, there was no middle ground on the vote…
May 19, 2008 at 12:13 am #46582MasterP
ParticipantLiam said:
Just did what the public wanted.Wasn’t sure public votes counted anymore…
I will start a new one then with limit awps to 2.
May 19, 2008 at 12:14 am #46583Liam
ParticipantMasterP said:
Wasn’t sure public votes counted anymore…I will start a new one then with limit awps to 2.
Sure they count. I’m just not changing the rotation on 1.6 or CSS or anything else w/o the input of the CL or Bitey.
May 19, 2008 at 1:04 am #46587YahooEarth
ParticipantLiam said:
Sure they count. I’m just not changing the rotation on 1.6 or CSS or anything else w/o the input of the CL or Bitey.So did the awp get banned or not?? And if so, did Bitey approve??
May 19, 2008 at 1:11 am #46588Liam
ParticipantYahooEarth said:
So did the awp get banned or not?? And if so, did Bitey approve??Keyword: rotation. Yes, its banned.
May 19, 2008 at 7:41 am #46592Nickname
ParticipantLiam said:
Sure they count. I’m just not changing the rotation on 1.6 or CSS or anything else w/o the input of the CL or Bitey.technically we have no CSS CL ATM
May 19, 2008 at 11:24 am #46595Liam
ParticipantNickname said:
technically we have no CSS CL ATMYup, which is why if rotation on CSS got changed, it would get cleared through bitey.
May 21, 2008 at 12:35 pm #46775Bitey
ParticipantSorry I haven’t been around lately, computer got a virus that humped it into submission. Anyways as for the CL I have been throwing around the idea of letting MasterP do it if he is still up to it for the summer and then we will have a real vote at the meeting at the beginning of the semester in the fall, so if you want it MasterP it is yours.
May 21, 2008 at 12:40 pm #46779Nickname
ParticipantBitey said:
Sorry I haven’t been around lately, computer got a virus that humped it into submission. Anyways as for the CL I have been throwing around the idea of letting MasterP do it if he is still up to it for the summer and then we will have a real vote at the meeting at the beginning of the semester in the fall, so if you want it MasterP it is yours.Maybe you should PM him about it?
May 21, 2008 at 12:43 pm #46780Bitey
ParticipantMiller Light, Good Call!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.