- This topic has 794 replies, 48 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
rainefardreamer said:
you know i posted in about every thread i could find that i could contribute to, and still i can’t figure out how nodice posts as often as he does, it’s like ninja posting…haha, prob b/c i click on the site like every 5mins i’m sitting at a pc.
lulz, i’m 99.95 sure im the only one in my town that visits the site, and my town alone made the top 3 charts in NC, only to follow the towns the local students live in. but srly i click on the site 415 times in the last 30 days o_0
Hello my name is NoDice, and I’m addicted to http://gaming.wcu.edu
MajorMajorMajor said:
1)olivia wilde2)kristen bell
3)jessica beil
homo
i have to amend my list… i was thinking about it and i think too many people are pretty
i just got really low standards i guess
MajorMajorMajor said:
i have to amend my list… i was thinking about it and i think too many people are prettyi just got really low standards i guess
i think that too, maybe we are equally messed up? wanna hug it out? meet me at wcu on the 21st : )
also raise your hand if this picture confuses your penis (or vagina)
Rocket Rob said:
Soooo this basically a jailbait thread?I think I have some pics from 4chan some where around.
this was a troll thread that’s derailed into pics of women? i dunno anymore, i’m sure i’ve got some demotivators of jailbait, but i’m not sure how they’d go down.
eh *edited* it let’s do it
that reduced to 92% picture on this page is of a lady who played a teacher that got with a student in a movie..mad haht..student seemed underage..ew pedobearfiles..best things in life ARE illegal..no doi..MINIforLYFE! Hannah gonna make it to this LANna that is a few hours away from ATLANTA? : ? LOOTOOL!
Hannah Montana said:
Girly up there ^^^Its Hannah!!!!!
Woot
oh hannah, too bad you ended up on another page
also your girl is a slut!
: )
lol no shes not….
bathing suit tops… psh
Watch out girls… you’re not allowed to go swimming with your swimsuit on… silly you
Hannah Montana said:
lol no shes not….bathing suit tops… psh
Watch out girls… you’re not allowed to go swimming with your swimsuit on… silly you
you didn’t know this?
it’s the new rule, however if you are below 7 on the hotness scale, it’s time to buy yourself some t-shirts for the beach cause we don’t wanna see that
: )
you don’t see Emily Osment going around with a guy like 6 years older than her
rainefardreamer said:
you didn’t know this?it’s the new rule, however if you are below 7 on the hotness scale, it’s time to buy yourself some t-shirts for the beach cause we don’t wanna see that
umm raine don’t you know the new scaling system? we call it the “Binary System” basically you award a girl with a 1 or 2, 1 being you would do her, and 2 being you wouldnt.
makes life so much easier lol
If it is a binary system shouldn’t it be 0 1? That’s the way I roll. Actually I think the scale needs work because the is the hottest girl you’ll ever be lucky enough to date and she is a ten by definition. However there are all those other beautiful people that you will never have a chance with, how would you rate them? Or would you put the hottest girl you know on the same scale as those people, doesn’t seem fair. But this might be related to why I think most girls I see are attractive, low standards are a possible option. But I like to think of it as seeing the best in people
rainefardreamer said:
If it is a binary system shouldn’t it be 0 1?shhh thats what i meant lol
and i agree… i hate it when we are sitting around and some guys is like, “im tryna talk to this girl, she is a good 10” and im thinking…. well what if i think shes a 7. i guess the other issue is that there is never a factual basis so the system just fails. its all based on opinions. lol… i also tend to find myself giving most people an 8 anyways….i never give tens because its like that “end all” and if i meet someone hotter…. what are they then?
the 0 &1 system works because it takes away all the opinion values and makes it a yes/no question lol
MajorMajorMajor said:
shhh thats what i meant loland i agree… i hate it when we are sitting around and some guys is like, “im tryna talk to this girl, she is a good 10” and im thinking…. well what if i think shes a 7. i guess the other issue is that there is never a factual basis so the system just fails. its all based on opinions. lol… i also tend to find myself giving most people an 8 anyways….i never give tens because its like that “end all” and if i meet someone hotter…. what are they then?
the 0 &1 system works because it takes away all the opinion values and makes it a yes/no question lol
true i like the binary system, because it makes me think of binary dependent variables from regression which is *edited*ing awesome because you take all these different variables and condense a yes/no answer from a continuous range. Which in turn makes me think of Magic: The Gathering because some counterspell had on it’s flavor text “Magicians have spent decades turning magic into a simple yes or no” or something like that. Which makes me wish i drafted more. Isn’t funny how the mind works
oh well, back to the topic. It’s always an opinion thing, i mean what if you like the chubby girls and your friend doesn’t? Perhaps there is a exchange rate for one set to another to get an accurate rating from prefence to another. I think this problem requires a notebook, a basic 4 function calculator, friends, a table where lots of women pass by and large amounts of alcohol. Only then can truth be discovered
WTF you guys…
The 0 to 10 system has been passed down for generations and is deeply rooted in fact. If you suspect your significant other does not hold the rating you believe she does you are obligated to acquire neutral, third party judges to determine, without bias, what her rating is. Should this panel of judges not not be able to settle on a rating you are required by stastical mathematics to drop the highest and lowest values and then take the average of the remaining values, rounding down. A rating determined by such a panel of judges cannot be overruled unless by another panel of completely neutral, third party judges after a period of no less than thirty days.
MasterP said:
WTF you guys…The 0 to 10 system has been passed down for generations and is deeply rooted in fact. If you suspect your significant other does not hold the rating you believe she does you are obligated to acquire neutral, third party judges to determine, without bias, what her rating is. Should this panel of judges not not be able to settle on a rating you are required by stastical mathematics to drop the highest and lowest values and then take the average of the remaining values, rounding down. A rating determined by such a panel of judges cannot be overruled unless by another panel of completely neutral, third party judges after a period of no less than thirty days.
i like it but you have significant other when it should be random chick or girl you are currently seeing
MasterP said:
WTF you guys…The 0 to 10 system has been passed down for generations and is deeply rooted in fact. If you suspect your significant other does not hold the rating you believe she does you are obligated to acquire neutral, third party judges to determine, without bias, what her rating is. Should this panel of judges not not be able to settle on a rating you are required by stastical mathematics to drop the highest and lowest values and then take the average of the remaining values, rounding down. A rating determined by such a panel of judges cannot be overruled unless by another panel of completely neutral, third party judges after a period of no less than thirty days.
see the problem is that it is hard to find an unbiased 3rd party… too many guys cannot be unbiased that way
Ashley Tisdale dident wish me a happy birthday and Hanna Montana did…. there for Hanna >> Tisdale
/thread
rainefardreamer said:
it’s only cool if it comes with two noses, one post-op and one pre-opthere was pre and post op?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.