Who likes cocaine!?!

its not supposed to be funny…. well actually it is….in that wow thats kinda smart actually

smuggling coke under the water ::contemplates profits::

drug submirine for the loss

kip it was in mexican territory i believe we cant just go in there, and thats a *edited*load of money to sink. cops sell the drugs to safe places to get cars and other things. and for drug stings

this is true major this is true

pyro urban said:

you realize it wasn’t headed for US waters, right? =)

Article said:

Chertoff, who is on a three-day trip to meet with Mexican security officials, said drug cartels are increasingly relying on the subs to smuggle cocaine to the United States.

Note they make more than 1 drug run in the lifespan of a boat. I’m willing to bet it had already been in US waters before.

Poopie said:

why not try this cocaine? its so much cheaper!

yeah, this was pulled off the shelf not even 1/2 year from launch. thanks to the FDA keeping us safe.

MajorMajorMajor said:

pyro and masterp

 

 

give it a rest…. urban obviously didnt read the article or if he did he is very illiterate, and masterp we kno u are well versed but this was supposed to be about CRACK not technicalities

 

 

 

god…. to imagine what would happen if u were locked together in the same room for a day

MasterP said:

The US has a unique solution to this sort of problem, one we discovered a century ago called “Torpedoes”. These “Torpedoes” have the ability to move, all by themselves, towards a target and can typically destroy it.

 

The one exception is large, heavily armored ships which may take an “assload” of firepower to sink. For all intents and purposes we can assume with a fair degree of certainty that said Columbian navy vessels do not possess the armor to survive more than a single spitwad hit from an American naval vessel, up to and including the Rowboat Class.

 

/Sarcasm

 

If you didn’t get it from my post, I think we should have sent one of our own submarines after it and sunk it.

i replied we cant go in mexican waters without permission and he said it has to go through US waters to dock in the US, but the article says it was going from one mexican port/shore to another mexican port/shore.

so i think you are illiterate major… show me where it says in the article that this sub was going to US waters or why US should have gotten the submarine themselves. think before you speak

Just curious, but does the US or Mexico actually “own” the waters?? Or is it international waters?? And either way, trafficking(sp?) drugs is illegal in both the US and Mexico, so maybe we were just helping the good ol’ Mexicans out a lil bit…And we all know that a cut of that would eventually get to the US since it is most likely 1000% more profitable there than in Mexico…

rainefardreamer said:

couldn’t these guys just buy a sub from the russians? seriously…it’s not like the drug kingpins are short on cash, or drugs which i’ve heard could double as cash, a nuclear submarine and a reasonably competent crew, possibly also acquire via russia, would make drug running so easy.

I lol at the thought of a Russian sub in US waters. We can track heat signatures of nuclear subs with satallites when they are docked so using them would raise a lot of eyebrows. The US claims dominance over waters within a certain radius of US territory. It used to be like 3 miles but after 9/11 it got increased by quite a bit. Idk what it is now, 20 miles I believe.

Btw Urban, Colombia isn’t a Mexican city/port/shore/territory.

Dice said:

everything south of texes (toast (umm)) is Mexico duh

Antarctica has Mexicans?

That’s like 2 objects occupying the same spot in space/time.