Vista Tweaks CS:S

Viewing 21 posts - 1 through 21 (of 21 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #5442
    Lemm
    Spectator

    Does anyone know any good vista tweaks to get a better framerate at CS:S…

     

     

    I have 2 gigs of ram.. vista is using up half of that…. i have a 2.4ghz dual core processor..

     

    i was thinking it had something to do with the processor… since when i change the resolution it seems to have no effect at all on the framerate… I guess that may sound dumb.. but well it’s what’s going on..

     

     

    there’s like 80 processes running in the task manager.. wtf? it came like this.. and no stupid ad software either.. just windows being evil.. mojave my *edited*

    #56265
    Liam
    Spectator

    Do a search on unneeded vista services and turn those off. That’s about it.

    #56267
    Kuros
    Spectator

    You may have some malware running in the background. Even with all my G15 applets and a few chrome windows open I only have 67 processes. What kind of graphics card do you have?

    #56270
    Pink Monkey #13
    Spectator

    yea, i just started up and i’ve only got 61 processes. vista is very heavy, but not THAT heavy. not to mention, you only have 2 gigs of RAM. 3 gigs is the recommendation i think.

    #56275

    3gigs is the max for 32bit

    #56276
    Liam
    Spectator

    NoDice said:

    3gigs is the max for 32bit

     

     

    No, 4 gigs is the system max. However, that includes video, cmos, sound, and system.

    #56278

    good thing i got 4,, even though it only used 3

    #56291
    MasterP
    Spectator

    With CSS, IE, MSN, AIM, Xfire, Steam, Outlook, Virtual PC, Daemon tools, Windows Onecare, and WCU’s faculty/staff VPN tunnel tool running I’m at 64 processes. You’ve got garbage running you don’t need and it isn’t Vista’s fault at all.

     

    What’s your framerate NOW?

    What processor do you have?

    What TYPE of ram do you have?

    What video card do you have?

    #56319
    Lemm
    Spectator

    well i’m not expecting the world.. but i expected it to run better than my old laptop that was 5 years old and it can’t even do that…

     

     

    it is a laptop.. and here are the stats again

     

    Intel® Core™ 2 Duo P8600 (2.40GHz, 3M L2 Cache, 1066MHz FSB)

    2.0GB, DDR2-800 SDRAM, 1 DIMM

    NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

    160GB Hard Drive, 7200RPM with Free Fall Sensor

    15.4″ UltraSharp™ Widescreen WUXGA (1920×1200) Display-Brushed Metal Black

    Genuine Windows Vista® Business SP1, With media

    Dell Slim 65W Auto/Air/AC Adapter

    8X DVD+/-RW w/Roxio and Cyberlink Power DVD™

    Intel® WiFi Link 5100 802.11a/g/n Draft Mini Card

    Intel vPro™ Technology’s advanced management features

    Resource DVD – Contains Diagnostics and Drivers

    9 Cell Battery

     

    anyways.. when i started it up it asked my why i didn’t connect the 90 w psu that came with it.. but it only came with the 65 w psu???

     

    also it has lots of dell programs on there for the hot keys and etc

     

    the gfx is a nvidia quadro nvs 160M with 256mb on the card… it’s no high end card by any means.. but seriously

    i get 40 FPS at the most

     

    I seriously think I’m about to install xp over it…

    #56320
    Liam
    Spectator

    That won’t really help. I would watch your memory usage and see what its doing.

    #56321
    MasterP
    Spectator

    Lemm said:

    Intel® Core™ 2 Duo P8600 (2.40GHz, 3M L2 Cache, 1066MHz FSB)

    2.0GB, DDR2-800 SDRAM, 1 DIMM

    NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

    160GB Hard Drive, 7200RPM with Free Fall Sensor

    15.4″ UltraSharp™ Widescreen WUXGA (1920×1200) Display-Brushed Metal Black

    Genuine Windows Vista® Business SP1, With media

    Dell Slim 65W Auto/Air/AC Adapter

    8X DVD+/-RW w/Roxio and Cyberlink Power DVD™

    Intel® WiFi Link 5100 802.11a/g/n Draft Mini Card

    Intel vPro™ Technology’s advanced management features

    Resource DVD – Contains Diagnostics and Drivers

    9 Cell Battery

    That’s a decent WORK laptop. By no means is it anywhere near good for gaming no matter what OS you put on it. Below is a link to your video card stats. It should play the game fine on a decent resolution but I wouldn’t go above 1440×900 in CSS and would consider going down to 1024×768 if need be.

     

    http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_nvs_no…_techspecs.html

     

     

     

    Lemm said:

    anyways.. when i started it up it asked my why i didn’t connect the 90 w psu that came with it.. but it only came with the 65 w psu???

    Call and ask about it. If it came from the factory with the wrong power adapter that’s something that should have been dealt with after the first power on. Having a lesser power adapter will reduce the overall effectiveness of the laptop, either lowering the clocks on your processor and video card or making it so you can’t charge the battery and use the laptop at the same time.

     

    Lemm said:

    also it has lots of dell programs on there for the hot keys and etc

    Cut them off. Start-msconfig. At the services tab check the “Hide all Microsoft” box and close what you don’t want/need. On the startups do the same but be mindful as the sidebar and a few other useful MS programs are there as “Windows Vista”.

     

    Lemm said:

    the gfx is a nvidia quadro nvs 160M with 256mb on the card… it’s no high end card by any means.. but seriously

    i get 40 FPS at the most

    Quadro cards have never been built for gaming and tbh I’m surprised they’d put one in a laptop. The stats on the page I linked to above are well below what I consider decent by modern standards.

     

    Lemm said:

    I seriously think I’m about to install xp over it…

    By all means but keep in mind if it came with Vista you probably won’t get XP drivers. Oh btw, it won’t get much faster than it is already. If you want to reinstall, reinstall Vista with a non-Dell DVD and use your existing serial. I think you’ll find that Dell shipped the laptop with too much bloatware, which has nothing to do with how fast Vista should be running on it.

    #56332
    YahooEarth
    Spectator

    Sounds like you have sort of the same issue I have, but mine is 100 times worse than yours since my lappy isn’t even close to being a gaming lap. But I use this auto exec config made for low end computers and it is the only way I am able to play.

     

    http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/show…ad.php?t=523089

     

    It turns stuff way down, but its not too too bad to play with…maybe give it a go? Couldn’t hurt I don’t think…

    #56429
    Lemm
    Spectator

    YahooEarth.au said:

    Sounds like you have sort of the same issue I have, but mine is 100 times worse than yours since my lappy isn’t even close to being a gaming lap. But I use this auto exec config made for low end computers and it is the only way I am able to play.

     

    http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/show…ad.php?t=523089

     

    It turns stuff way down, but its not too too bad to play with…maybe give it a go? Couldn’t hurt I don’t think…

     

     

    hmm.. looks like lemm is going to suck from now on… maybe when i get some money i’ll spend like 200 dollars and get a new psu and vid card for my old box… that’s a lot of money just to play css though

    #56433
    Nickname
    Spectator

    The geforce nvs160m == geforce 9400; which is meant for lowend gaming no matter how you look at it. look at running 1280×800 at medium settings, no AA/AF

    #56435
    MasterP
    Spectator

    Btw, lower-end gaming laptops can still win at LANs. Took mine to ASU and well, yeah.

    #56460
    YahooEarth
    Spectator

    My graphics card is an Invidia GeForce GO 6150….suck it…try gaming on this…

    #56469
    rainefardreamer
    Spectator

    i’ve got a 7950, i do alright… i thought that cs was more processor heavy anyways?

     

    like yahoo, i use a config that reduces the settings so the fps is higher, i hover around 80-90 fps now…

    #56555
    Lemm
    Spectator

    rainefardreamer said:

    i’ve got a 7950, i do alright… i thought that cs was more processor heavy anyways?

     

    like yahoo, i use a config that reduces the settings so the fps is higher, i hover around 80-90 fps now…

     

     

     

    yeah i’m thinking i’m just gonna have to order a new psu.. this 65watt is prolly killing my performance… it’s supposed to have a 90 watt… that should boost it decently..

     

    i mean come on .. it’s *edited*ing css… I swear my 5 year old laptop that the screen just died on could play better than this thing… its gotta be that the system is slower because of the reduced power.. i mean it even told me that the system is slower…

     

    is there any way to tell exactly what it reduced the clock speed etc to?

     

     

    EDIT: also lemm is not an idiot.. i reduced everything down low the day i got it and to 1024 X 768.. i also reduced the dx level from 9.0 to 8.1.. that gave me a slight increase in fps

    #56560
    Lemm
    Spectator

    ok… this has got to be it..

     

    I went into the BIOS and here is what it said about the clock speed:

     

    Current Speed: 1.2 GHz

    Minimum Speed: 1.6 GHz

    Maximum Speed: 2.4 GHz

     

    I’m thinking it’s all the power supply.. tomorrow I’m going to call up dell and talk to some kind of rep.

    #56564
    Nickname
    Spectator

    oh yeah i sisnt realize that you weren’t using the normal power supply!

    Dell makes it so the video card remains in the lowest clocked mode if you aren’t using the normal power supply…

    #56662
    Lemm
    Spectator

    also.. when I run the computer on battery power high performance it gives me the full thing and i was getting over 100 fps on source earlier…

     

    stupid power supply..

Viewing 21 posts - 1 through 21 (of 21 total)
  • The forum ‘Counter-Strike: Source Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.