Home › Forum Archive › Game Server Discussion › Counter-Strike 1.6 Discussion › Things to be done to the 1.6 server
- This topic has 111 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 1 month ago by
YouWinGameOver.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 12, 2009 at 11:41 am #86791
lockEm
Spectatord2.sticky-icky said:
can you include de_chateau, de_survivor, de_piranesi, de_cpl_mill, cs_militia, and fy_dinoiceworld in the rtv list please?is there some chance you can enable the buying of armor & pistols only for awp_dust? that’s how we’ve been playing awp_dust…
That kind of defeats the purpose of RTV. Going from a map people don’t want to play to maps people really don’t want to play is a little silly.
June 12, 2009 at 11:44 am #86792d2.sticky-icky
SpectatorlockEm said:
That kind of defeats the purpose of RTV. Going from a map people don’t want to play to maps people really don’t want to play is a little silly.i beg to differ. a lot of people like those maps.
June 12, 2009 at 12:34 pm #86793dRuGLa
SpectatorlockEm said:
That kind of defeats the purpose of RTV. Going from a map people don’t want to play to maps people really don’t want to play is a little silly.Your assumption that people only like the maps you like is also a little silly.
June 12, 2009 at 1:16 pm #86795lockEm
SpectatordRuGLa said:
Your assumption that people only like the maps you like is also a little silly.I am basing this off the many times I’ve seen a low amount of people in the server when these maps are played.
June 12, 2009 at 1:18 pm #86796adam37
Spectatorout of the that list of maps you want rtv’d…cpl_might MIGHT be the only map i would add. Those other maps kill servers
June 12, 2009 at 3:09 pm #86802d2.sticky-icky
Spectatorit doesn’t hurt to add maps onto the rtv list. after all, people want to see a variety of maps when they choose to rtv. what’s the point of only adding the same maps we play all the time?
June 12, 2009 at 3:28 pm #86804adam37
Spectatorfixing the amx_ban issue now…apparently it will only work if you do amx_banmenu (which i only have access to), but you cant unban from there. amx_unban doesnt work either. I had to go into HLSW and unban Pacsunn.
June 12, 2009 at 3:59 pm #86808YouWinGameOver
Spectatorsince rtv is there, there has been some discussion that admins arent allowed to change the map, i figured since this issue should be public and other people should know I would post it here… Do admins still have the right to put a votemap up when the server is half full as before?
June 12, 2009 at 4:09 pm #86809xenocide
Spectator1.) “Your assumption that people only like the maps you like is also a little silly.”
if that were re: to me, i would simply argue that my opinions are far better than theirs so it doesnt matter..
2.) Piranaesi is >> than mill, imo and i’ve seen mill kill server far more often than pir
3.) Admins, currently, are NOT supposed to throw up votes for maps when > 10 ppl in the server, but imo, that’s not the best rule. However, if its possible, i think each admin should have a quota of votemaps they can use in this way, maybe like, 1-3 per week? just my thoughts
“screw you guys, i’m going home”
June 12, 2009 at 4:37 pm #86810adam37
SpectatorWhat?
Admins can throw up a map vote when the population is less than half (14 or less)
June 12, 2009 at 6:12 pm #86813torankusu
Spectatoradam37 said:
-PTB will now only switch you if you are deadWhy was this changed? Doesn’t this kinda defeat the purpose of the balancer? I’m 20-2 on dust2 right now and I’m on the winning team (it’s 10-1). I didn’t die for a bunch of rounds and the teams wouldn’t get auto’d. The only person who got auto’d was the second best guy who’s currently 17-5, but not until the team scores were like 9-1 when he actually died.
I just switched over cuz there are finally less cts than t’s.
If one guy’s doing really well and rarely dying, the team’s are gonna stay kinda stacked.
June 12, 2009 at 6:15 pm #86814lockEm
SpectatorWho cries about the PTB thing? When the round ends, you gotta step up and hold your own. Ain’t no thang.
June 12, 2009 at 6:37 pm #86816torankusu
SpectatorlockEm said:
Who cries about the PTB thing? When the round ends, you gotta step up and hold your own. Ain’t no thang.See the last couple threads by xenocide.
June 12, 2009 at 7:21 pm #86818lockEm
SpectatorLOL
June 12, 2009 at 8:10 pm #86819xenocide
Spectatori apologize, i was drunk and out of line. after all, this is a forum for club at a university and is therefore not nearly as shameless as my former post would suggest, so let me rephrase:
Dear Toransky,
I sympathize with your remarks about how the current ‘fix’ to PTB doesn’t work. I do not agree with your broader solution of maintaining the current system as is. I am aware that I like to complain, however I feel my concerns have merit and reducing my complaints to ‘crying’ simply doesn’t do that merit justice
. Additionally, it’s frustrating that the people who I see taking advantage of and defending what I consider to be a broken system tend to be admins. I am also sorry my grammar is bad when I am arguing on the forums or when I’m drunk – I’ll work on it. I’m not mad and I hope you guys aren’t either – but then again, maybe I would be too if I was wrong…Can we be friends???
-x
*************
re: adam37
oh lawl, i rly thought for no reason at all, the max players = 20. haha, good call…
June 12, 2009 at 8:33 pm #86824torankusu
SpectatorWhat does being an admin have to do with who wants to keep this or not? It just so happens that we have more admins than non-admins who post in the forums and who voice their opinion. And it’s not like admins get any added benefit from being able to shoot people when they get team switched. I want to also point out that I don’t think I’ve EVER seen any other regular complain about it before, even if they don’t post on the forums.
Also, I was pointing out how unfair the team balancer is now, you *edited*. I stayed on the winning team till I was able to switch cuz PTB wouldn’t switch me cuz I didn’t die. If I were making an argument to keep it so that you can kill each other when you were switched, I probably would’ve stated that.
Don’t twist my comment around just cuz you’re *edited*ed that I answered lockem’s question, which HE phrased that way. All I did was point out who keeps suggesting we change PTB.
June 12, 2009 at 8:37 pm #86826lockEm
Spectatorxenocide said:
um, excuse me bdags and faygots, i didnt suggest that ppl actually be DEAD to switch, i suggested that when they ARE switched, i.e. alive or dead, that they are not able to kill or be killed by other players.i dont know about you, but i grew up playing cs from 1.4+ and even the ppl who played from earlier versions should be able to appreciate what the end of a f u c k i n g round means. whether its grabbing a new beer, talking to the gf, taking some drinks from the old beer, talking to some *edited* clan members, etc. i don’t want to have to put up with the sh*t from lame admins (who are predominately the defenders of this) who have no life or irl disturbances so that they can kill me while im not paying attention and completely F U C K the compromise between limited money and balanced teams.
so torskanky, why don’t you go f**k yourslef until you find a better argument.
if you care to differ, argue for 16,000 every round. o.w. go back to high school where you obv still need to earn your degree from.
lol
June 12, 2009 at 9:13 pm #86829YouWinGameOver
SpectatorlockEm said:
loldefinite lol
June 12, 2009 at 9:36 pm #86831lockEm
Spectatorxenocide said:
um, excuse me bdags and faygots, i didnt suggest that ppl actually be DEAD to switch, i suggested that when they ARE switched, i.e. alive or dead, that they are not able to kill or be killed by other players.i dont know about you, but i grew up playing cs from 1.4+ and even the ppl who played from earlier versions should be able to appreciate what the end of a f u c k i n g round means. whether its grabbing a new beer, talking to the gf, taking some drinks from the old beer, talking to some *edited* clan members, etc. i don’t want to have to put up with the sh*t from lame admins (who are predominately the defenders of this) who have no life or irl disturbances so that they can kill me while im not paying attention and completely F U C K the compromise between limited money and balanced teams.
so torskanky, why don’t you go f**k yourslef until you find a better argument.
if you care to differ, argue for 16,000 every round. o.w. go back to high school where you obv still need to earn your degree from.
Apparently you need to go back to elementary school and learn the basics of grammar and sentence structure. Anyways…
The end of the round means one thing; and thats waiting the half a second you have to wait to play another round. You want to grab a beer or take a leak? Do it when you’re dead.
My favorite part about this was the life card you pulled. Apparently anyone who doesn’t go GRAB A BREWSKI OR TALK TO DA GIRLFRIEND has no life when the end of a CS round ends. But you can have a life during the round, just not at the end.
This post made you look 100% mentally handicapped. Of course, you don’t care. You’re obviously going to pull the life card again.
June 12, 2009 at 10:27 pm #86834torankusu
SpectatorlockEm said:
Apparently you need to go back to elementary school and learn the basics of grammar and sentence structure. Anyways…The end of the round means one thing; and thats waiting the half a second you have to wait to play another round. You want to grab a beer or take a leak? Do it when you’re dead.
My favorite part about this was the life card you pulled. Apparently anyone who doesn’t go GRAB A BREWSKI OR TALK TO DA GIRLFRIEND has no life when the end of a CS round ends. But you can have a life during the round, just not at the end.
This post made you look 100% mentally handicapped. Of course, you don’t care. You’re obviously going to pull the life card again.
LOL.
I was gonna go into the not having a life thing, but I was gonna stay on topic.
I love you, lockem.
June 12, 2009 at 10:52 pm #86835lockEm
Spectator<3
June 13, 2009 at 12:27 am #86836Major
Spectatorxenocide said:
so torskanky, why don’t you go f**k yourslef until you find a better argument.I mean seriously, comments like that and never called for. I can understand defending yourself when a sarcastic comment was made about you but there is no reason to say straight up *edited* yourself to someone no matter how much you disagree with them. If you came forward and were either playful, or preferably made a argument against it besides get a HS degree then I would have heeded what you said and maybe even see it as a good idea. But because you came forward with such remarks I see no reason to respect you or your ideas. Next time you want to convey an idea, make and argument and stop crying.
June 13, 2009 at 1:24 am #86837xenocide
Spectatoreh, sorry to get your panties in a bunch. i’m certainly not mad and if you are, you shouldn’t be. i didn’t realize cuss words (‘n baaad gramar) were over the line for forum bantering…
***
i edited my post, i’ll be more polite next time…
June 13, 2009 at 1:47 am #86838Major
Spectatorxenocide said:
eh, sorry to get your panties in a bunch. i’m certainly not mad and if you are, you shouldn’t be. i didn’t realize cuss words (‘n baaad gramar) were over the line for forum bantering…<3 they can be unbunched and you can banter me all you like
June 13, 2009 at 11:01 am #86841torankusu
SpectatorI wasn’t saying that we should keep it so that you can allow people to kill each other at the end of the round. I was just saying that how it is NOW, where it only switches the dead, isn’t working out SO great. While I was playing, PTB kept saying it couldn’t switch a valid target cuz all the people with good scores weren’t dead.
:l
However, I wouldn’t mind going back to how it was. BUT I want to point out that somewhere in my post history, I mentioned that I rarely get the kills anyway. I get nothing out of it. In fact, I die more often than I kill someone (I’ve probably only gotten like 5 kills or less since I’ve been playing here).
June 13, 2009 at 12:18 pm #86845d2.sticky-icky
Spectatoradam37 the new ptb system isn’t working at all so can we just go back to our old ptb system? obviously the good players at the top of the winning team are rarely gonna die so they’re not gonna be switched which defeats the purpose of the ptb system.
June 13, 2009 at 2:14 pm #86848MajorMajorMajor
Spectatortorankusu said:
However, I wouldn’t mind going back to how it was. BUT I want to point out that somewhere in my post history, I mentioned that I rarely get the kills anyway. I get nothing out of it. In fact, I die more often than I kill someone (I’ve probably only gotten like 5 kills or less since I’ve been playing here).LOL i remember once i just joined, picked up an AWP as the round ended and popped you a good one in the face no scope as you got swtiched…. god i felt pro
June 13, 2009 at 4:19 pm #86855torankusu
SpectatorMajorMajorMajor said:
LOL i remember once i just joined, picked up an AWP as the round ended and popped you a good one in the face no scope as you got swtiched…. god i felt proLOL. I don’t remember, but that is lol.
Also, I see PTB moving people who are still alive when it has to, so I guess that kinda works.
June 14, 2009 at 11:06 am #86868Chris’-‘
Spectatoradam37 said:
Anything else you all can think of?Solid rotation but it needs to be a bit longer, maybe add cbble and dust inn somewhere
June 14, 2009 at 11:45 am #86870YouWinGameOver
Spectatori think it should be ok for now. If its a little longer people may not play through the maps that dont want to play.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Counter-Strike 1.6 Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.