- This topic has 54 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 11 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
NoDice said:
source cant put a “fake” redirect up. it can be set up if you join a full server you get a popup message saying this server is full, try our GG server or w/e you want it to say. It does not automaticaly push the client into a server they dont wont to join. It also does not show a near full server on like d2, and pushes them to like 8ppl on cbbl like 1.6 does
TAG used to transfer players all the time from full servers to alternates. We also balanced 3 surf servers in a similar fashion, if they tried to join in the admin reserved slots it would kick them to another server instead WITHOUT notification. Don’t know if you can still do it but it used to be fairly easy to set up, maybe it’s a mani-admin thing.
NoDice said:
Yes it is “ghey”, and cheap but it got the dead 1.6 server back on 2 legs
And that’s fine but CSS doesn’t need proping up.
I’m for gungame and deathmatch. Both pretty fast paced servers. I support the commentary of the surf idea – that those that can, love it; those that can’t, hate it.
This may be stupid, but is wc3 out of the question? – does that get too broken? or just lame?
Obviously we will see when the vote comes up.
I’m all for the redirect idea… The regs would know about it beforehand and thus there would be
no problems… It’s just like you are joining WCU at some less populated time… and we are still
one big happy (most of the time) gaming family. :headset:
…it’s been said like 100 times now that a)masterP is not going for the redirect, and b)the redirect doesn’t even work…
YahooEarth.au said:
…it’s been said like 100 times now that a)masterP is not going for the redirect, and b)the redirect doesn’t even work…the redirect doesn’t even work? I think you know not what you talk about.
Im down for gungame or deathmatch… plenty of times lately when I have tried to log in and its full… I would definately stick to WCU servers if there were more options
I wouldn’t mind a GunGame or a Deathmatch (or hell even combine those two x.x).
Although… 24/7 dust 2 wouldn’t sound too bad either
Usually when the WCU main server is full, I go play a gungame or zombie infection server. They are both very fun mods to play and I wouldn’t mind seeing either. If I had to choose one though, I would choose the gungame mod because it is much faster paced and in my opinion, much more fun. Besides, the zombie maps are all glitchy and ghey most of the time…
One more thing I wanted to suggest was a REALLY fast paced gungame. I used to play on this gungame server that was ALWAYS full and they had it where you didn’t have to wait to the end of the round for a respawn. It auto-respawned after every death plus you only needed on kill per weapon for a level. It was hella fun and I have been trying to find another gungame server like it for the longest, but sadly I haven’t. Maybe toss this idea around?
I think a reversed gungame TURBO would be what ballz was trying to suggest, but the 1 kill to switch is not the best idea, makes the rounds go TOO fast imo. A two kill per gun or 1 knife kill to level up would be optimum…
YahooEarth.au said:
I think a reversed gungame TURBO would be what ballz was trying to suggest, but the 1 kill to switch is not the best idea, makes the rounds go TOO fast imo. A two kill per gun or 1 knife kill to level up would be optimum…I liked the one kill levels
But I agree that that might go a bit too fast…still 2 kill or one knife to level would be fun as hell just the same. If you guys did do a gungame mod server…this would be my suggestion
YahooEarth.au said:
I think a reversed gungame TURBO would be what ballz was trying to suggest, but the 1 kill to switch is not the best idea, makes the rounds go TOO fast imo. A two kill per gun or 1 knife kill to level up would be optimum…I second this. And Turbo is so the way to go. If not, it can be really slow.
btw…is this going to happen?
- The forum ‘Counter-Strike: Source Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.