Home › Forum Archive › Game Server Discussion › Counter-Strike: Source Discussion › Cheater in the source server
- This topic has 8 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 6 months ago by
Bitey.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 30, 2009 at 3:13 am #7432
lawlrence
SpectatorAs the description says there was a player walling in the server. His steam id is 0:1:4020736 and this is a demo of him.
http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=8b5f20f…04e75f6e8ebb871
The sketchiest parts are awping mid ct side and watch with mat_wireframe 3 on for full effect.
April 30, 2009 at 11:07 am #83197XRAY
Spectatorlulz i dont know if you dont know this but an admin has to be there to demo and ban the person…
April 30, 2009 at 11:24 am #83204MajorMajorMajor
SpectatorThank you for bringing this up!
Currently, while the demo you made may be excellent and show him BLATANTLY hacking, we still cannot allow demos from people other than admins. But even though we do not accept the demos You got us the steam ID and he will we on watch for him to pop back in the server. If you see him on again, please contact us again via forums/IRC/ or steam friends. I’m usually on IRC and would be happy to find an admin to help you out or you can add me: ctptrick19 and I will be able to help faster.
April 30, 2009 at 11:44 am #83211Phonetically Phamous (dice
SpectatorMajorMajorMajor said:
Thank you for bringing this up!Currently, while the demo you made may be excellent and show him BLATANTLY hacking, we still cannot allow demos from people other than admins.
i forgot was this a liam policy?
if demos shows hacking in our server, if they type status in consul and show steam id, i see zero reason why to not add that id to the list?
they can always appeal…………….
April 30, 2009 at 11:51 am #83214MajorMajorMajor
SpectatorNoDice said:
i forgot was this a liam policy?if demos shows hacking in our server, if they type status in consul and show steam id, i see zero reason why to not add that id to the list?
they can always appeal…………….
I mean the policy never got changed, so I assumed we still did not accept them. We could vote in a new policy if need be….
April 30, 2009 at 12:59 pm #83239Pink Monkey #5
SpectatorTime for an exec discussion…
April 30, 2009 at 1:09 pm #83240Kuros
SpectatorMy policy was not to accept them unless they were blatant and not a regular (to make sure it’s not a rage ban). If it’s blatant, banhammer time.
April 30, 2009 at 2:02 pm #83247MajorMajorMajor
SpectatorKuros said:
My policy was not to accept them unless they were blatant and not a regular (to make sure it’s not a rage ban). If it’s blatant, banhammer time.I agree, if its blatent, there should be a ban, I just think that a finalised ruling would be helpful in the future. Consistency is key
April 30, 2009 at 2:22 pm #83250Bitey
SpectatorMy reasoning for ruling against accepting demos from other people is because all demos can be altered and changed, so I think like Kuros if the hacking is blatent and they are NOT a regular then ban hammer away.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Counter-Strike: Source Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.