- This topic has 68 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
To be honest, now that I think about it, this rule really isnt enforceable with taking away from the server population in the long run.
adam37 said:
To be honest, now that I think about it, this rule really isnt enforceable with taking away from the server population in the long run./thread
that initial spam needs to be done with. if the winning team wins with most of its players having rifles, it makes spamming and kill the losing team alot easier and make its really imbalenced
no. definitely not. this is like saying banning the awp on dust2. does not make sense at all. fy_snow is a spam/aim map… if u dont know the spams or get spammed figure it out and grow a pair
peek.a.boo said:
that initial spam needs to be done with. if the winning team wins with most of its players having rifles, it makes spamming and kill the losing team alot easier and make its really imbalenced+1
rossy said:
no. definitely not. this is like saying banning the awp on dust2. does not make sense at all. fy_snow is a spam/aim map… if u dont know the spams or get spammed figure it out and grow a pairFirst, you try to compare banning spamming on snow to banning awps on d2, which doesn’t make any sense since you claim that snow is a spam/aim map, which dust2 isnt. There’s really nothing to figure out spam wise in snow, you just point at a wall and hold down fire. The whole growing a pair comment implies that you think people are scared of spamming. No, its just god awfully annoying, especially when you spawn and try to get a weapon and end up with 10 hp without seeing anyone.
YouWinGameOver said:
yes but there is absolutely no way to enforce this and we would look like huge assholes by tryingagreed
Play the map how its designed, if the majority does not like how its designed take it off the server.
NoDice said:
agreedPlay the map how its designed, if the majority does not like how its designed take it off the server.
certain maps contain exploits. this is not one of them.
YouWinGameOver said:
certain maps contain exploits. this is not one of them.like the 35hp_2 health glitch WHICH HAPPY RUINED FOR ME
kthxbai
YouWinGameOver said:
yes but there is absolutely no way to enforce this and we would look like huge assholes by tryingThis ^^
I dont plan on enforcing it or making my admins enforce it
I just looked through the plugin list and didn’t see any.
There’s a spawnzone protection plugin for friendlyfire only that we could recode for enemy fire as well.
I mean initial wall spam ONLY catches the tards who take more than 5 seconds to find a gun. If you gun shop then you deserve to be cheifed.
MajorMajorMajor said:
I mean initial wall spam ONLY catches the tards who take more than 5 seconds to find a gun. If you gun shop then you deserve to be chiefed.
Fixed.
guys you know there is a order of events here right?
warn them
kick them
ban them
its silly to ban someone for spamming .. they might be cool people that don’t know the rules.
lockEm said:
Ritsuka said:
:: BUMP ::
Its Right Here GOoSe !!
Why do you type like that?
Cuz it make Up UpSeT Xp
torankusu said:
MajorMajorMajor said:
I mean initial wall spam ONLY catches the tards who take more than 5 seconds to find a gun. If you gun shop then you deserve to be chiefed.
Fixed.
thanks bro
Adam Faulkner said:
guys you know there is a order of events here right?
warn them
kick them
ban them
its silly to ban someone for spamming .. they might be cool people that don’t know the rules.
+1
Adam Faulkner said:
guys you know there is a order of events here right?
warn them
kick them
ban them
its silly to ban someone for spamming .. they might be cool people that don’t know the rules.
The question is “should we prohibit spamming on snow,” not “are we allowed to ban spammers.”
torankusu said:
Adam Faulkner said:
guys you know there is a order of events here right?
warn them
kick them
ban them
its silly to ban someone for spamming .. they might be cool people that don’t know the rules.
The question is “should we prohibit spamming on snow,” not “are we allowed to ban spammers.”
Well, Spamming the outer areas are important,
But Taking one right to the face as you are turning to pick up the whatever ‘oh that’s shiny’
Hurt’s……beacuse the other side still has their weapons from last round……and a grenade….
I feel you don’t have to ban’em, A warn and a slap on the wrist here and there.
But it does also give better chances to Beginners To “shop”
We have had a HUGE load of Much much new Players coming in the servers
Sometimes its not about the score its about helping them too >.>’
::thinks to self:: “RAWR pWn noobie MAwahah forget em!!” <.<
Evil as i am, I still run slow maps with them telling them how to play
I teach them to Look for the sounds and why not the misguided spam spots
this is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. Like the one guy who’s name isn’t important enough for me to scroll up to see it said, if you gun shop, you deserve to be chief’d.
spamming is not illegal and shall never be. Spawn killing is illegal and should always be considered against the rules.
Adam Faulkner said:
spamming is not illegal and shall never be. Spawn killing is illegal and should always be considered against the rules.
this ^^
MajorMajorMajor said:
I mean initial wall spam ONLY catches the tards who take more than 5 seconds to find a gun. If you gun shop then you deserve to be cheifed.
Adam Faulkner said:
spamming is not illegal and shall never be. Spawn killing is illegal and should always be considered against the rules.
Bam! I remember last year when the server would always be full. There would be a large mass of us sitting and spamming the middle pillars. I find it HILARIOUS!
Raven said:
this is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. Like the one guy who’s name isn’t important enough for me to scroll up to see it said, if you gun shop, you deserve to be chief’d.
<333
- The forum ‘Counter-Strike 1.6 Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.