Aztec

Viewing 21 posts - 31 through 51 (of 51 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #46484
    BallzinurJawz
    Spectator

    I am trying to imagine an aztec w/ no awps…OMG, I think it will be a fun map to play!??!!

     

    Yes, ban awps

    #46495
    Liam
    Spectator

    Awps are gone from aztec. :)

    #46508
    BallzinurJawz
    Spectator

    Liam said:

    Awps are gone from aztec. :)

     

     

    Woot!

     

    <3 Liam

    #46520
    Nic Meloney
    Spectator

    AWP Restrictions are a good idea on any map in my opinion. Or, better yet – restrict the people who USE the AWP on a regular basis.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    and by restrict I mean molest and murder.

    #46522
    YahooEarth
    Spectator

    GONE FOREVER!?!?!?!?

     

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    #46523
    YahooEarth
    Spectator

    There was also no option to vote for restricting tha awp!! UNFAIR VOTE, I call for a revote with an option for restrict the awp and not ban it…

    #46528
    Pink Monkey #13
    Spectator

    BallzRawlz said:

    Woot!

     

    <3 Liam

     

    yay liam! *queues the band*

     

    Nic Meloney said:

    AWP Restrictions are a good idea on any map in my opinion. Or, better yet – restrict the people who USE the AWP on a regular basis.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    and by restrict I mean molest and murder.

     

    hahaha. i agree with nic

    #46529
    pyro urban
    Spectator

    does this restriction apply for 1.6 as well?

    and t’s can use a map just like a ct can. in the water, on the bridge, or by the DD

    #46574
    MasterP
    Spectator

    Is this really necessary? Why not limit it to 2 per team? Just because Ts don’t know how to play the map doesn’t mean you need to rebalance the map for them. It means they need to quit being retarded and play smarter.

     

    All Ts need is 1 GOOD AWPer and a jump/decoy and you can take out 3-5 CT AWPers. I know, I’ve done it. It’s not that hard.

    #46575
    Liam
    Spectator

    MasterP said:

    Is this really necessary? Why not limit it to 2 per team? Just because Ts don’t know how to play the map doesn’t mean you need to rebalance the map for them. It means they need to quit being retarded and play smarter.

     

    All Ts need is 1 GOOD AWPer and a jump/decoy and you can take out 3-5 CT AWPers. I know, I’ve done it. It’s not that hard.

     

    Is anyone else sick of Aztec turning into a awp map

    I love aztec!!! [ 6 ] [23.08%]

    Only if you banned the Awps [ 13 ] [50.00%]

    Dont Care [ 2 ] [7.69%]

    Its Gotta Go! [ 5 ] [19.23%]

     

    Just did what the public wanted.

    #46578
    Pink Monkey #13
    Spectator

    MasterP said:

    Is this really necessary? Why not limit it to 2 per team? Just because Ts don’t know how to play the map doesn’t mean you need to rebalance the map for them. It means they need to quit being retarded and play smarter.

     

    All Ts need is 1 GOOD AWPer and a jump/decoy and you can take out 3-5 CT AWPers. I know, I’ve done it. It’s not that hard.

    it’s just TOOO easy isn’t it? lol.

     

    but srsly. i hate aztec turning into an awp map, and i always auto assign, so i ALWAYS get T.

    #46580
    YahooEarth
    Spectator

    Again, there was no middle ground on the vote…

    #46582
    MasterP
    Spectator

    Liam said:

    Just did what the public wanted.

     

    Wasn’t sure public votes counted anymore…

     

    I will start a new one then with limit awps to 2.

    #46583
    Liam
    Spectator

    MasterP said:

    Wasn’t sure public votes counted anymore…

     

    I will start a new one then with limit awps to 2.

     

    Sure they count. I’m just not changing the rotation on 1.6 or CSS or anything else w/o the input of the CL or Bitey.

    #46587
    YahooEarth
    Spectator

    Liam said:

    Sure they count. I’m just not changing the rotation on 1.6 or CSS or anything else w/o the input of the CL or Bitey.

     

    So did the awp get banned or not?? And if so, did Bitey approve??

    #46588
    Liam
    Spectator

    YahooEarth said:

    So did the awp get banned or not?? And if so, did Bitey approve??

     

    Keyword: rotation. Yes, its banned.

    #46592
    Nickname
    Spectator

    Liam said:

    Sure they count. I’m just not changing the rotation on 1.6 or CSS or anything else w/o the input of the CL or Bitey.

    technically we have no CSS CL ATM

    #46595
    Liam
    Spectator

    Nickname said:

    technically we have no CSS CL ATM

     

    Yup, which is why if rotation on CSS got changed, it would get cleared through bitey.

    #46775
    Bitey
    Spectator

    Sorry I haven’t been around lately, computer got a virus that humped it into submission. Anyways as for the CL I have been throwing around the idea of letting MasterP do it if he is still up to it for the summer and then we will have a real vote at the meeting at the beginning of the semester in the fall, so if you want it MasterP it is yours.

    #46779
    Nickname
    Spectator

    Bitey said:

    Sorry I haven’t been around lately, computer got a virus that humped it into submission. Anyways as for the CL I have been throwing around the idea of letting MasterP do it if he is still up to it for the summer and then we will have a real vote at the meeting at the beginning of the semester in the fall, so if you want it MasterP it is yours.

    Maybe you should PM him about it?

    #46780
    Bitey
    Spectator

    Miller Light, Good Call!

Viewing 21 posts - 31 through 51 (of 51 total)
  • The forum ‘Counter-Strike: Source Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.