Reply To: Mrs. Palin

Home › Forum Archive › Other › Political Discussion › Mrs. Palin › Reply To: Mrs. Palin

#97129
MasterP
Spectator

YouWinGameOver said:

MasterP said:

You really want me to do your own research? Spend a few hours googling around, you’ll find it’s about as “scientific” as global warming.

 

By your logic, if you are taught evolution but have the right to not believe it then it should also be fair to teach creationism. Hey no one said you HAVE to believe it…

 

 

MasterP said:

My beliefs are similar to what Nickname stated.

 

I have my cake, I’ve feasted upon it, and all the while all the dots line up to form a pretty picture.

 

NuRayZ said:

MasterP said:

You really want me to do your own research? Spend a few hours googling around, you’ll find it’s about as “scientific” as global warming.

 

By your logic, if you are taught evolution but have the right to not believe it then it should also be fair to teach creationism. Hey no one said you HAVE to believe it…

While evolution hasn’t been proven, it isn’t simply based on faith and if it has so many holes why does the majority of the science community still accept it as the theory to which life has taken?

 

“the scientific community there is essentially universal agreement that the evidence of evolution is overwhelming, and the scientific consensus supporting the modern evolutionary synthesis is nearly absolute.”

 

# ^ Delgado, Cynthia (2006-07-28). “Finding evolution in medicine” (hmtl). NIH Record 58 (15). http://nihrecord.od.nih.gov/newsletters/2006/07_28_2006/story03.htm. Retrieved 2007-10-22.

# ^ a b Ruling, Kitzmiller v. Dover page 83

 

Must be the media right? lmao

 

inb4 yes i know i’m being trolled, but what else am i gonna do on a boring wednesday at work?

Everyone blindly accepted global warming as being irrefutable science. Up until the leaked emails blantantly talking about changing study results to meet their needs. The same people that blindly accepted that, like you for instance, are the same ones that blindly accept everything else taught in a liberal, public education science class. *edited*ing tools is all you people are, lacking all ability to stop and wonder “is my teacher full of bull*edited*?”. I questioned the teachers quite often and did outside research on things that didn’t seem to add up.

 

Btw, I’m not trolling at all, I’m pointing out facts, or lack thereof.

I think both of these statements are not fair enough judgments to make about all liberal colleges and professors.

 

@ MP I think that creationism is too fine of a line to be taught in school. I am Jewish and am constantly tired of Jesus/Bible toting bull*edited*… The problem with most creationist theories is that it doesn’t include anything but Catholicism/Christianity.

I was referring to middle/high school where most of the brainwashing begins. The only way to prevent a child from being force-fed crap by a teacher at that level is to put them in another class or school, both of which also do harm.

 

As to the limited scope, you’re right. I wouldn’t have a problem with beliefs of other faiths being taught alongside in such a curriculum. It would also expand understanding of other religions such as Islam and Buddhism. The child knows what religion/sect he is being brought up in and if they’re religious they’re going to filter out the conflicting information and simply use it as a learning opportunity about other people, not so much fact as much as info.

 

It’s possible for everyone to have their cake and eat it too with this issue, the problem is some like having all the cake for themselves and aren’t willing to share. Demote back to kindergarten IMO.