MasterP said:
There are just as many holes in evolution as there are in creationism. The difference? Those who believe in evolution have a power base in politics while those who believe in creationism have a base in religious sects. Since the political elite have pushed all aspect of religion out of government, guess which one won? Neither is a perfect account for how we got here and I find it incredibly shortsighted for you libs to bash one and not the other.
You know what else the difference is? One is based off of science, and the other is attempting to take science out of the equation. Personally I think it’s a little bit of both. Chaos theory just doesn’t fly for me, something definitely started life up, the course which it is on, however is definitely on a learning, or evolutionary process.
MasterP said:
Regardless of what side you’re on, you have to agree (because science says so) that there is a living object inside the womb. Now we can sit here and debate all day over what constitutes it as being “human” but it is a living, oxygen-consuming creature. What gives us the right to prevent that creature from being born? Why is it that dogs are treated with more respect and dignity when they’re put down than developing human beings?
Here’s an instant way to reverse all the abortion laws:
Since homosexuality is now considered genetic (i lol’d btw) let’s find the gene that causes it and start telling parents before birth that their child will be *edited*. If parents started aborting future-*edited*s en-mass there would be a massive political outcry, and there should be, but it’s no more unfair to abort a *edited* than it is to abort anyone else. That’s not how it would go down though.
I think it go down more like this:
Doc: I’m sorry ma’am, you’re baby has the *edited* gene.
Woman: Oh no. But it goes against my ideals. What do i do…
Doc: well we could take care of it.
Woman: Either I rip it out now, or have it grow to be homo
Doc: So…what’s your decision.
Woman:
Left the last one open to imagination. It seems she’s *edited*ed on her decision. Either she aborts and is a hypocrite to her virtues, or she has the homo baby and has a son who is a walking hypocrite to her virtues. And before you go and explain “well since homosexuality is a choice, then she’ll teach him to be straight”…LOL good luck with trying to teach a *edited* kid to be straight.
The real question is, if you believe homosexuality is a choice, what do you do if your own kid was *edited*? Either you love him, or you reject him. Feelings aside, would you want him to grow up being honest with himself? Or would you want him to grow up like the numerous homosexual hypocrites walking around washington?