MasterP said:
You guys get kicks by slaying/kicking/banning players. I get my kicks by revoking admins
Remind the r.tards that we are not CAL. In fact we’re better, most of our players have IQs greater than their age.
MasterP said:
I never said warn more than once. If you’ve warned them in the last month I don’t care what you do so long as it stops. I do ask that you slay before kicking/banning. If they’re always doing it feel free to skip to kicking/banning. As usual, all I ask is that you use common sense and your best judgement.
If they do it before it says “Terrorist/Counter-Terrorists Win” slay them. Doing it at the end of the round IS STILL AGAINST THE RULES!!1!11one! The difference is that since it gives no advantage I don’t care about it as much as during the round.
Is it me or do these to posts not go against each other and may be the reason for the confusion about this . I don’t like to kick or ban anyone for any reason and only do it when it is the last resort yes i slay after i warn and they do it but the first post seems to be saying that since we (like) to kick/slay/ban that our admin could be in danger and in the 2ND post we are told that if said people have been warned to slay/kick/ban if needed . And yes i know its going to be taken that I’m trying to be a *edited* about this but I’m truly not i’m just trying to get complete confirmation as to what the first post was to mean compared to the 2ND post because its like the 2 posts contradict each other and i could see where it could be causing confusion . I under stand what your saying about if they have been warned do what has to be done .