Ephraim said:
This debate is worthy and both sides are raising valid points. The idea that we have to know every single thing about each other in order to hold a decent debate makes no sense. If it were true, then nobody could ever debate anything, because they have never been inside their opponent’s head. If anyone thinks that somebody has given false information, call them on it and explain why it is wrong. That is how a debate works.
I’m just saying, this is a healthy debate and there is no reason to end it prematurely.
I wasn’t saying we couldn’t debate, I was saying there was no way of you knowing why the other person feels the way they do about something, they can tell you all about it, but unless you have been there, your not gonna believe a *edited* word they say. I guess it was more a long the lines of we are not going to change anyone’s minds most of the people on this forum are extremely closed minded and refuse to see any other view point, that’s fine if that is what floats their boat, just not my cup of tea, I am more for MajorX3’s view point, I like compromises, which are very minimal in this thread…
I also don’t like debates that end in neither side seeing anything different about the situation, what is the point of a debate if no one sees something in a new light? That is not a debate, that is an argument where emotions are high and everyone is just angry. I am not saying this particular thread has reached that but that is where it seemed it was going, hence my previous post.
Lastly I should not have to call anyone out on anything, I’d rather you figure it out for yourself instead of calling you out in public like a fool, hence why I say, do your own research, I won’t do it for you.