ExiLe said:
so here is a question to the PC guys. So if me and a bunch of people who are hardcore console gammers came to a meeting and all voted for some random PC game that we liked to play and it took the spot of one or two of your usual games wouldnt you be mad? would you be like “this isnt fair b/c we are the ones who play these games competitivly and put the time we put the time into making these tournaments good.” The Console meeting was for those people who actually cared about what happens during the console portion of the LAN. I myself told atleast 4 or 5 people to come that didnt just for the fact that they themselves were just playing the PC games. Now i get where you are comming from about Votes at the main meeting but honestly i know most of the console gamers didnt vote for the PC games to be played b/c its not a big deal to us. But when the console stuff comes up the PC players just voted for casual games that yall probably dont even play that much. So how come when we want to put the games we all decided on at the console meeting that no PC people were at we get yelled at? We all just are thinking about what would be the most fun for our type of gamer.
What you are doing is segregating the gaming club into two different sections. You need to realize that you are part of a bigger organization and that the overall organization is the law. Think of Walmart where you have a department manager and a store manager. Store wide policy overrides department policy and the store manager’s word is law over the department managers. Consoles are a department of THE GAMING CLUB. It’s not the console club and it’s not the PC club. Both are sections of a larger piece and both must adhere to the rules that that larger piece has put into place. The votes at the general meeting are THE LAW. YOU CANNOT OVERRIDE THESE VOTES BECAUSE YOU WANT TO OR THINK IT’S BETTER. Your job at this point is to cater to the games that were voted upon AT THE GENERAL MEETING.