Actually, there should be a council leader for XBox 360, one for PS3, one for the Wii, etc. etc. The reason behind this is simple. We have a council leader for every PC Game that we play, thus we should have a council leader for every console we support. I believe that is the way it is written into the constitution, thus the way it should be. It is also written into the constitution that every council leader gets to have their own cabinet.
Here is a direct Quote from the Constitution, if you have any further questions:
“Each council will be represented by one (1) game or gaming platform, which is voted on by the general membership (see Article V). The maximum number of councils shall not exceed ten (10) at any time. No game shall be placed on the server(s) without having a corresponding council. Also, no gaming platform shall be supported by the Club without having a corresponding council and leader.
Each council will have a governing representative, hereafter referred to as council leader, who will directly oversee the activities of their respective council.
It is the duty of each council leader to facilitate and run meetings for their respective council, manage the general direction of their council, organize smaller events in which their council can participate, and finally promote unity and a sense of community within their council. It is also the duty of each council leader to update and maintain their respective game and to report any problems or limitations that the game server may have, while updating or upgrading their game server files.
Each council leader will report directly to the executive council and attend all executive council meetings. It is the responsibility of each council leader to report the agenda and general minutes of their respective meeting no later than twenty-four hours after their respective meeting to the Secretary, so that the Secretary may keep an accurate account of all happenings.”
All you guys have to do is read the constitution or ask me I know what is allowed and what isn’t allowed per our governing body, the constitution. And console Council leaders do not need anyone else over them, i.e. head Console Council Leader, as other Council Leaders do not have anyone over them other than the Executive Committee. Consoles should work together to come up with an agreeable Lan Tournament situation as they have worked in the past with our other hosted Games. This really is a simple process and I understand the lack of comittment, as I know from first hand what you are talking about. This is the way it was supposed to be and it was the way it was back when we first started supporting consoles, but People got lazy and didn’t want to keep track of council leaders so they lumped them, which of couse lumps all the work as well. Just trying to provide insight if it helps.