MajorMajorMajor said:
pyro and masterp
give it a rest…. urban obviously didnt read the article or if he did he is very illiterate, and masterp we kno u are well versed but this was supposed to be about CRACK not technicalities
god…. to imagine what would happen if u were locked together in the same room for a day
MasterP said:
The US has a unique solution to this sort of problem, one we discovered a century ago called “Torpedoes”. These “Torpedoes” have the ability to move, all by themselves, towards a target and can typically destroy it.
The one exception is large, heavily armored ships which may take an “assload” of firepower to sink. For all intents and purposes we can assume with a fair degree of certainty that said Columbian navy vessels do not possess the armor to survive more than a single spitwad hit from an American naval vessel, up to and including the Rowboat Class.
/Sarcasm
If you didn’t get it from my post, I think we should have sent one of our own submarines after it and sunk it.
i replied we cant go in mexican waters without permission and he said it has to go through US waters to dock in the US, but the article says it was going from one mexican port/shore to another mexican port/shore.
so i think you are illiterate major… show me where it says in the article that this sub was going to US waters or why US should have gotten the submarine themselves. think before you speak