- This topic has 98 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Ok, we will start with where to aim. Below is the hitboxes on Counter-Strike 1.6.
As you can see, no matter where you aim you’re 99% likely to hit the left arm. Next we will move on to wall densities.
As you can see, there really isn’t much point to having walls in 1.6. You can shoot right through them.
Next we move on to awping. It’s really easy here to:
Clearly you don’t need to aim anywhere near them to score a death blow.
Next we move on to grenades. Below is the blast radius of a 1.6 grenade.
As long as you throw the nade within 3/4’s of the map, you are sure to score 70+ damage.
Last but not least is the wonderful physics of 1.6. Below is an example of the powerful physics engine inside of 1.6.
Man that’s amazing! State of the art!!!
you should see the gernade of CZ
Oh BTW: Kuros, i cant waif for your 101 on TF2
PS: this should be titled “this is why 1.6 is the most played game ever released” they are going something right.
1.6 at 80,740 players to CS:S petty 38,961
Counter-Strike 6.750 billion
Counter-Strike: Source 1.928 billion
Stats speak the truth http://www.steampowered.com/v/index.php?area=stats
no i think its b/c ppl are cheap; even my crappy laptop can play sauce.
Take potion#9 for example, he has a system more than capable but he is too cheap to spend $20 for CS:S.
Besides, we all know that 1.6’s physics are OMGWTFBBQ so much better than source!
Kuros said:
And how many of those 1.*edited* players “can’t play source on their laptops?”its good to have a game thats so kick *edited* that i can play on with a $50 machine with
Windows® 95,
Pentium® 133
24 MB RAM
and still kick *edited* having equal amounts of fun on a $2000 machine running CS:S
PS: we wont lafe at you and we will let you cry when reality sets in
everyone agrees 1.6 is not the same a CS:S same concept CT v. T’s and is a FPS.. but so many changes were made. We just like cracking on eachother…. i play both.
Source is “funner” but hands down 1.6 is “better”
I like to have fun when i play its not about points so i play source more often…
I almost can agree that 1.6 is more a “hardcore” game while source is more a casual fun game. But I’d rather have fun anyday
That’s why CS:P is gonna be so awesome. http://www.cspromod.com
1. Is this supposed to be a joke or serious?
2. Some walls you cant shoot through
3. Have you ever heard of interp? to sum it up the hitboxes follow behind the player.
4. That nade radius is WRONG
5. And if it is a joke, LOLOLOLOL
pzl8
also
GOOD JOB using *edited* from two years ago trife, not only are those models not even used anymore, the hitboxes have been completely fixed and don’t trail ahead or behind. Also to sum it up your game still has a problem with interp, you try to mimic those settings in source and you can’t, wonder why? Also, how bout some mad *edited* talk about how bigger models make it easier, I would LOVE to hear the logical fallacies there. QQ
Now I understand why I never hit a chest or head in CS. Apparently you can’t. lol
Looks like I’m upgrading to an AWP next lan.
nickname said:
upgrading to an awp? thats all you use now isnt it?Can’t stand the 1.6 AWP but now I’ll get over it and use it anyway.
well i have 1.6 and source and i have prob only played 3 hours of source, and i’ve had it since the day it came out :-/
nickname said:
upgrading to an awp? thats all you use now isnt it?nah, knife, scout, para, and m4/ak all the way. plus the nightvision, just ‘coz
Fascist Flakes (Jagr) said:
Not that he’s any good with it or anything.<3
exactly
- The forum ‘Counter-Strike 1.6 Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.