YouWinGameOver said:
*edited* you.
Why won’t you respond? Because I am *edited*ing right?
I don’t respond because if you can’t even figure out how to use the quote button why the hell should I assume you’ve figured out how to form complete sentences and logic patterns.
YouWinGameOver said:
It is not a disease first off.
Notice I said I wasn’t touching that. I’ve proven before that it’s a moral disease, even had some libs agree that the argument made sense, but doing so here would take way too long and you’d fall off the bus halfway there so I’m not going to bother.
YouWinGameOver said:
It’s easy to tell because you are so *edited*ing afraid of them. You segregated them to the point where you can tell.
I don’t remember saying I was afraid of them. I avoid them if I can but I’m not afraid to talk to them. Since I’m not insecure I don’t really mind talking to them.
There’s a big difference between being afraid and avoiding. I would be afraid of going near opposing gang members arguing in the street but would avoid gang members regardless if at all possible. Doesn’t mean I won’t talk to gang members, and I had to a few times while working for Duke Energy, but that doesn’t mean I was afraid while doing so.
YouWinGameOver said:
I am not in a frat and I don’t go to keggars. So get off your hi horse and your computer take you nose out of the bible and really look at the world. You are being a pretentious *edited*.
Sorry. Every place I’ve ever worked at has frowned HEAVILY upon talking about “banging achievements” and other similar conversations. The real world simply does not tolerate that, especially not in an office environment, it’s simply too big of a sexual harasement case waiting to happen. I’ve worked in retail, public utility, and university. The only people I’ve ever heard talk about that were those in frats and those who frequented keggers, none of which worked or lived in the real world.
Where exactly do you work or discuss sexual achievements? I’m kinda curious at this point.
YouWinGameOver said:
Once again *edited* you. I have lost a lot of respect for you with in this thread alone. The fact that you feel the need to not respond to someone because they screwed up on something simple shows how hi you have put your *edited* on a pillar.
To be perfectly honest, I’m not in this for your respect. If you can’t take 30 seconds to fix a post how can you honestly expect me to spend 15 minutes responding? Is it fair that when you don’t spend the time to properly bash me that I don’t spend the time to properly reply?
Btw, anyone who takes a political-oriented thread personally needs a serious reality check. Take a giant step back and remember this is the internet. Continuously saying “*edited* you” just makes you look like the *edited* here.
YouWinGameOver said:
And another thing how is this upbringing and lifestyle when conservatives have *edited* kids. Did those kids not read the bible? Did their dad’s rape them? What was it that “changed” them to be *edited*…gave them that “choice” to be *edited*?
When did conservative mean good parenting? You can be a conservating and still never spend time with your kids. In fact you can even be conservative and NOT be a Christian. As comical as your stereotyping is, it’s really getting old.
Being “conservative” means you have a set of values. Not all those values have to fit into the “stereotypical conservative” set of values, simply that you’re close. You can be atheist and vote conservative. You can rape your kids and vote conservative. Again, you need to take a giant step back and look at the larger picture. No one has mentioned political parties or ideals up until now and it’d be a real shame if, instead of arguing the points, you dragged this back to the same-old republican vs democrat argument. That’s not what this thread is about.