MasterP said:
NuRayZ said:
The military is made of primarily heterosexual males and until we have true equality of carrying the burden (IE women and *edited*s NOT being exempt from the draft) I have no problem bashing others or pushing them to secondary roles. Keep in mind that removing homosexuality as a draft dodger will put millions of you liberals back in the draft pool if/when we ever do have another draft. IMO you’d be better off not having “equality”.
I have nothing against *edited*s, it’s a choice they make, but straights don’t flaunt their heterosexuality in the military so why should they tolerate *edited*s flaunting their homosexuality. I mean really, the military is a choice, you don’t HAVE to be there.
I am liberal to a point but I’m not *edited*. I think *edited*s should be open in the military because it isn’t a choice. It isn’t deciding whether or not you go to class today, it isn’t whether or not you are going to eat chocolate right now, its not a *edited*ing choice at all. This is where the uber conservatives don’t understand. What makes it a choice for you to enjoy women? Did you say “Wow I think I am going to eat *edited* today.” No, you didn’t.
Most *edited*s don’t flaunt their homosexuality because they are oppressed. And how do heterosexuals not flaunt their sexuality. Most men and women for that matter run around talking their asses off about who they *edited*ed at parties the night before. This may not be your cup of tea talking about who you got with but most do.
And P.S. *edited* EQUALITY. If women and men were truly equal in the army everything would be standard. A woman would have to run a mile in 6minutes (don’t know exact number) just like the guy does. I don’t want someone backing me up if they can’t run as quick or jump as far…etc. If there really was a cookie cutter model it would have been shown already.