THE Ephraim said:
Nah. The Halo 3 review was where a lot of these ridiculous arguments originated. It was funny, but did not count as a legitimate review. He barely mentioned multiplayer (the most popular feature of the series) because he “didn’t care about it.” Imagine a music magazine reviewer going to an AC/DC concert. Now imagine that reviewer writing an article about how the opening act was decent, but only mentioning AC/DC in the last paragraph because he “doesn’t really get them.” He would be fired. The same principal applies to the Halo 3 review.
The MOH review got me arguing with a caveman-looking loser about politics. It was like a whole new universe of stupid. Sorry to get off topic. Just remembering that fat, hairy idiot makes me want to punch something.
hahahah very true
then clarification: game play and microsoft beating halo into our systems = very on point
therefore because the multiplayer is sweet=game isnt as bad as he says 
(still biased towards it tho)