Home › Forum Archive › Other › Random › Finally ordered
- This topic has 30 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 8 months ago by
ak_21.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 22, 2007 at 11:43 am #1692
Kuros
SpectatorSo I finally ordered my new computer, the specs are as follows:
ASUS M2N4 SLI Motherboard
AMD Athlon 4600+ X2
2 GB Corsair XMS 4-4-4-12 @ 800mhz
eVga Geforce 7950 gt ko overclocked 512mb
250 GB Seagate SATA 3.0 gb/s hdd
Thermaltake 470 Watt dual 12v rail powersupply
Thermaltake Soprano Case w/ dual 120 mm fans
I think it’s gonna kickass, should be here Thursday or Friday.
January 25, 2007 at 9:35 pm #15514Adam Faulkner
SpectatorYEA MAN! that will be the shizzonthenet
January 25, 2007 at 9:58 pm #15521gxti
SpectatorFinally, someone decided to challenge my video card.
January 26, 2007 at 12:13 am #15539Phonetically Phamous (dice
Spectatorlordkuros said:
So I finally ordered my new computer, the specs are as follows:2 GB Corsair XMS 4-4-4-12 @ 800mhz
you coonrod, you told me to get the 650mhz b/c the $30 differeance in price was pointless
January 26, 2007 at 7:39 pm #15549Kuros
SpectatorYour cpu will not run at 800 mhz…if you really want to know why i can tell you the math behind it…
January 28, 2007 at 5:43 pm #15576Kuros
SpectatorJanuary 28, 2007 at 7:02 pm #15577Phonetically Phamous (dice
Spectatoryou make me sick
January 28, 2007 at 7:29 pm #15580Falcon
Spectator
dang! okay, okay, just to try to come close I’m a gonna make a user on this rig and turn off everything I don’t need (hp drivers take a shatload of cpu time and ram) and I’m gonna try to challenge that…no, wait, nevermind, you have the cs:s test. just to see, I’ll still try that other user crap… anywho, i got this:
January 28, 2007 at 8:31 pm #15582Kuros
SpectatorWho else wishes to challenge the pwnasaur?
January 28, 2007 at 10:51 pm #15590gxti
SpectatorOf course, framerate varies by settings. I get 115, but I’ve got everything balls-to-the-wall.
January 28, 2007 at 10:58 pm #15592Adam Faulkner
Spectatorwell .. you dont want me to try! .. maybe 50?
ill get 1000 in 1.6
January 29, 2007 at 1:11 am #15599Phonetically Phamous (dice
SpectatorFebruary 14, 2007 at 10:28 pm #16680JazzmanSA80
SpectatorFebruary 14, 2007 at 11:30 pm #16684Pitagot
Spectatoro yeah lol nice for 1gb ram and a crap video card and 2.6 cpu lol dell inspiron 6000 lol.
Attachments
- stresstest.bmp (2304 KB)
February 15, 2007 at 12:00 am #16688gxti
SpectatorStop attaching bitmap files, you lazy *edited*s. You’re wasting space, and firefox on linux can’t even display them.
EDIT: *edited* it, bmp files aren’t allowed as attachment files anymore. Learn to use jpg/png, plox!
February 15, 2007 at 12:19 am #16691Pitagot
SpectatorFebruary 15, 2007 at 12:29 am #16693gxti
SpectatorI know how to use them. But really, are your screenshots important enough that i should have to download them and open an image editor just to look at a 2mb file of some text on a screen? </rant>
February 15, 2007 at 12:35 am #16694stevorob
SpectatorI get 122 with 1280×1024 4x AA and 16x ASF. Everything else on high.
I’m on an ATI X850XT @ 615core/633mem
February 15, 2007 at 1:04 am #16698gxti
SpectatorSimilar settings, same framerate, 7900GT. My card, however, does not come with AIDS, but with win! Nvidia FTW.
February 15, 2007 at 1:36 am #16703stevorob
SpectatorNever was a fan of nvidia… always had issues with mine. Of the ATI cards I have, none of them have given me any problems.
To each his own. I’m not bashing nvidia… just not for me
February 15, 2007 at 3:25 am #16709Falcon
Spectatoreh, I dig nvidia for their general linux compatibility… ATI runs a good market on windows cards though, for directx laden apps
February 15, 2007 at 8:58 am #16714Adam Faulkner
SpectatorATI CCS is SO BAD, watches as it tears away at my ram. The dam program needs more ram that what is stored on the card and the functionality is limited. I still cant find vertical sync and OpenGL setting in the control center. Nvidia on the other hand has a very scaled down version that works perfectly inside windows display properties.
Now .. point proven.
February 15, 2007 at 9:52 am #16718JazzmanSA80
SpectatorGeForce 7600 GT OC ftw!
February 15, 2007 at 10:11 am #16721Kuros
SpectatorActually, Geforce 7950 gt ko ftw…since i beat you by over 40 fps…
February 15, 2007 at 10:43 am #16722JazzmanSA80
SpectatorFebruary 15, 2007 at 12:25 pm #16726gxti
SpectatorBlargh! *edited* your leetness…
February 15, 2007 at 12:30 pm #16727Phonetically Phamous (dice
Spectator7600 FTW
love the cost to performance… cant be beat
February 15, 2007 at 12:31 pm #16728JazzmanSA80
SpectatorBoo-yah! Plus it’s clearly has the most leet performance.
February 15, 2007 at 2:43 pm #16731Kuros
SpectatorI am humbled.
February 15, 2007 at 4:16 pm #16733JazzmanSA80
SpectatorIn all seriousness, I wish I could afford a system like yours, but I did pretty good on an $800 budget. NEW EGG FTW. Plus I’m an Intel dude, and that cost me some extra.
I concede to your superiority, Kuros- even if your rig still needs a dash of 1337

-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Random’ is closed to new topics and replies.