torankusu

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 61 through 90 (of 1,551 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: HON #100597
    torankusu
    Spectator

    I think he means he’s busy playing Second Life.

    in reply to: player pics! #100596
    torankusu
    Spectator

    YO MAMA

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    is a wise woman.

    in reply to: CYBORG R.A.T. 9 #100595
    torankusu
    Spectator

    LOL. D:

     

    I didn’t think to add that option. I don’t slam my keyboard or mouse on the desk when I die, lol.

     

    Perhaps something this expensive could break some people’s habit — or maybe you could awp me back with it. ;x

    in reply to: eReaders #100594
    torankusu
    Spectator

    I’ve been considering this, too. While it has its advantages, I think I’m sticking to books.

    in reply to: CYBORG R.A.T. 9 #100550
    torankusu
    Spectator

    I just added another poll option that may be relevant to your thoughts on the topic.

    in reply to: CYBORG R.A.T. 9 #100549
    torankusu
    Spectator

    lockEm said:

    I saw “CYBORG R.A.T.” on the top right-hand corner of my screen in that new topics box and got really excited…I was really hoping this would be about an actual cyborg rat. Guess not :(

    ROFL, it’s funny that you say that cuz earlier before, I googled some pictures of it and these showed up in the results:

     

    http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/photos/uncategorized/rat_brain_implant.jpg

    http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/img/Robo_Rat_m708432.JPG

    http://www.biotele.com/index/robo-rat.gif

    in reply to: Im Back! #100427
    torankusu
    Spectator

    wb. :P

    in reply to: Ban initial wall spamming in snow? #100385
    torankusu
    Spectator

    You’re concerned about which? Banning wall spamming or banning people for wall spamming? Because people are mistaking this thread for banning people for wall spamming when it’s not.

    in reply to: Muslim Extremists threaten South Park creators #100354
    torankusu
    Spectator

    Scary.

    in reply to: Random Pic Thread #100350
    torankusu
    Spectator

    She’s got the bottom wrong, too.

    in reply to: PETA #100348
    torankusu
    Spectator

    NuRayZ said:

    its been known that certain predatory mammals play with their food before killing/eating it.

     

    Just look at the killer whales. they drown baby humpback whales by forcing under water. It literally drowns to death, and all they do is eat some of the baby fat off it and leave it.

    Drowning isn’t playing with their food before eating it, though. That’s how they’re killing the whales. And I doubt that’s how the hunt goes every time — eating just some of the fat off of it? I read that they eat 500lbs daily. Seems like a waste if they didn’t eat more of it. Was this an isolated incident? I haven’t found anything so far that says they only eat bits of a whale and leave the rest of it. This NatGeo video (here) says that this whale calf will feed the pod of killer whales for a week.

     

    Also, you can’t figuratively drown to death in the ocean.

     

    MasterP said:

    If you like cats you have no right to bash humans for the brutality we show towards prey.

    I read that cats “play” with their prey because their prey may take a defensive stance and the cat is playing it safe. It doesn’t go for a full-on attack out of self-preservation. You’re comparing animal instinct with killing for profit (assuming you’re referring to the baby seal thing).

     

    Keep the other things I said in mind because they are relevant. I’m not against the slaughter of animals or eating meat. I just think it should be done in a way that causes less suffering. In a previous post, I said that I was referring to the conditions that the animals live in before being slaughtered. Not only do I not think it’s right to have any creature living in such *edited* poor conditions, the quality of the meat is also better when the animals aren’t stressed. Om nom nom.

     

    Quote:

    Or check out the leopard seal in Antarctica. They don’t kill their prey (the penguin), they play with it until it dies or they are tired. They’ve even been known to immobilize one and attack more, basically making a sport out of it.

    I don’t know if this is the same as the cat thing, but I did find this:

     

    Quote:

    The leopard seal is bold, powerful and curious. In the water, there is a fine line between curiosity and predatory behavior, and it may ‘play’ with penguins that it does not intend to eat.
    in reply to: PETA #100340
    torankusu
    Spectator

    Bitey said:

    When baby seals are killed by any predator they are similarly “beaten to death”, I am not saying it isn’t cruel, but it isn’t really anything different than what has been happening for thousands of years. Same for fish, most predators will beat them before consumption. It’s a wicked world we live in…

    I think predators are more efficient in killing their prey. They aim to kill it for food, not beat its head so that they don’t damage the fur. Also, I don’t think that seals’ natural predators are hunting only the babies and en masse to wear them.

     

    I’m okay with hunting, but not for sport. Wearing fur is okay, too, if they need it; not cuz it’s luxurious. If you’re killing animals for survival, like if you’re in the wild and you’re cold and hungry, I’m okay. But I don’t think you need it, or hunting for sport is cool, if you’re a fat guy well-fed with a gun and a hunting outfit.

     

    Ephraim said:

    Fun Fact:

    Back in 2003, a group of Palestinian terrorists attached a bunch of explosives to a donkey in an attempt to blow up Isreali civilians. The bombs went off before the donkey reached the target, killing nobody but the animal. Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, then issued the following statement to Palestinian chairman, Yasser Arafat:

     

    “Your Excellency, We have received many calls and letters from people shocked at the bombing. If you have the opportunity, will you please add to your burdens my request that you appeal to all those who listen to you to leave the animals out of the conflict?”

     

    Later that year, the Washington Post asked her if she would condemn Pallestinian terrorists attempting to kill humans too. Newkirk responded by saying:

    “It’s not my business to inject myself into human wars.”

     

    Bitey said:

    Same for fish, most predators will beat them before consumption. It’s a wicked world we live in…

     

    Unless I’m mistaken, it’s been scientifically proven that fish are missing the part of the brain that allows the sensation of pain.

    It looks like recent studies are showing they might.

     

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100112090126.htm

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/04/090430161242.htm

    in reply to: Ban initial wall spamming in snow? #100333
    torankusu
    Spectator

    Yeah, but it’s not even something that people are concerned about. :P

    in reply to: PETA #100330
    torankusu
    Spectator

    You’ve never heard people talk (or joke) about clubbing baby seals? Sounds like they’re getting beaten to death to me.

     

    I didn’t mean suffering from the way in which they’re killed; I meant the miserable conditions they live in before they’re slaughtered.

     

    Not everyone utilizes practices to minimize suffering during the slaughter. I’ve seen videos of raccoons being skinned alive instead of being killed first. I’m sure there are other animals that aren’t knocked unconscious or stunned prior to butchering.

    in reply to: PETA #100318
    torankusu
    Spectator

    I eat meat (om nom nom!), but I don’t like how the animals suffer before they die.

     

    Anyway.

     

    bigpot6.jpg

    in reply to: PETA #100311
    torankusu
    Spectator

    They protest the slaughter of other animals besides livestock.

    in reply to: Ban initial wall spamming in snow? #100249
    torankusu
    Spectator

    My point is we’re not talking about banning people for spamming.

    in reply to: player pics! #100214
    torankusu
    Spectator

    How is there a winner if both parties are supposedly lacking something?

    in reply to: de_cbble #100159
    torankusu
    Spectator

    Andman.

    in reply to: de_cbble #100147
    torankusu
    Spectator

    When was the last time you’ve seen someone play in appstate’s server? I don’t even know if it’s still up. I think my brother removed it from my favorites.

    in reply to: de_cbble #100141
    torankusu
    Spectator

    lol. :(

     

    They had a nice server after the population disappeared.

    in reply to: HAPPY BIRTHDAY LIAM! #100125
    torankusu
    Spectator

    You’re older than me. I thought we were about the same age. xP

    in reply to: de_cbble #100124
    torankusu
    Spectator

    marLey` said:

    like over 3 years lol…i mean i used to spend most of my time on the AppState forums and shhtuff. haha….ooo aim_pistols is fun too…as is fy_inferno its like snow but looks like ferno and u can go up top and stuff…real fun map for between 10-20 ppl

    That fy_inferno sounds interesting. I love de_inferno.

    in reply to: Ban initial wall spamming in snow? #100123
    torankusu
    Spectator

    marLey` said:

    Adam Faulkner said:

    guys you know there is a order of events here right?

     

    warn them

    kick them

    ban them

     

    its silly to ban someone for spamming .. they might be cool people that don’t know the rules.

     

    I believe my order of operations on this matter when i had admin went something like

     

    warn,warnagain,slap,slapagain,UBERSLAP,slay,kick,tempban

     

    haha i always loved counter spamming major once i heard where he was spamming from ^__^

     

    torankusu said:

    Adam Faulkner said:

    guys you know there is a order of events here right?

     

    warn them

    kick them

    ban them

     

    its silly to ban someone for spamming .. they might be cool people that don’t know the rules.

    The question is “should we prohibit spamming on snow,” not “are we allowed to ban spammers.” :P

    :rolleyes:

    in reply to: player pics! #100104
    torankusu
    Spectator

    Yes, classy.

    in reply to: HAPPY BIRTHDAY LIAM! #100094
    torankusu
    Spectator

    Also, was the birthday thing disabled for a while? I wasn’t seeing birthdays (like when it was Dicey’s bday and mine) until late March. Just knew it was the spam king’s bday cuz of facebook.

    in reply to: HAPPY BIRTHDAY LIAM! #100092
    torankusu
    Spectator

    Happy birthday, Superman!

    in reply to: player pics! #100073
    torankusu
    Spectator

    His gf does look slimmer.

    in reply to: HON #100058
    torankusu
    Spectator

    Psh, how could I send a request to Bitey without having it?

     

    Also, I gave you my name a while ago and I never saw a request from you. <_<

     

    Edit: Plus I am on LoL more. xP Poopie plays it, too, apparently.

     

    Edit #2: I am online and I don’t see any nublets on!

    in reply to: HON #100026
    torankusu
    Spectator

    I think HoN’s graphics are better than those in a 12-year-old (but still awesome) game.

Viewing 30 posts - 61 through 90 (of 1,551 total)