NuRayZ said:
In 2006 running for Governor, Palin agrued for Creationism in the class room as an “alternative” to evolution. that IS retarded, stupid, not intelligent. Creationism should be classified and taught as part of a religious philosophy course, NOT in science. That’s just one reason why i think Palin is retarded.
There are just as many holes in evolution as there are in creationism. The difference? Those who believe in evolution have a power base in politics while those who believe in creationism have a base in religious sects. Since the political elite have pushed all aspect of religion out of government, guess which one won? Neither is a perfect account for how we got here and I find it incredibly shortsighted for you libs to bash one and not the other.
NuRayZ said:
Pro Life vs. Pro Choice. It’s tough. Potential lives that could change the world are destroyed. I’m all for women’s rights, but I also think there should be some reform on the rules and laws pertaining to abortion. Things like fetus development in respect to the abortion should be more restrictive. Maybe restrict the amount of abortions. You only get a certain amount. Most women who get abortions probably learn, but this would help the rest of the thick headed nymphos out there to finally get it.
Regardless of what side you’re on, you have to agree (because science says so) that there is a living object inside the womb. Now we can sit here and debate all day over what constitutes it as being “human” but it is a living, oxygen-consuming creature. What gives us the right to prevent that creature from being born? Why is it that dogs are treated with more respect and dignity when they’re put down than developing human beings?
Here’s an instant way to reverse all the abortion laws:
Since homosexuality is now considered genetic (i lol’d btw) let’s find the gene that causes it and start telling parents before birth that their child will be *edited*. If parents started aborting future-*edited*s en-mass there would be a massive political outcry, and there should be, but it’s no more unfair to abort a *edited* than it is to abort anyone else. That’s not how it would go down though.