MasterP said:
new_rayz I have no idea where you’re getting this sampling spew from but the article posted only said the commerce secretary was OPPOSED to sampling. It did NOT say that sampling would be used, nor did it directly imply that.
If doing a house by house headcount can’t create an accurate or at least mostly-accurate count how the hell do you think randomizing and guessing will help? You can randomly sample and educatedly guess any result you want if you know how, and I imagine one of the Democrat’s chief strategist knows a thing or two about getting his party’s way through sketchy at best tactics.
But hey, if they use voter registration information to determine where people live I imagine pretty much every homeless and deadbeat in the country will now be on the books…
yeah I see that now. I was drunk at the time when I first posted about sampling. I just looked back at my history log to see how or why I focused so much on that. Past all the porn, I found that I had apparently read related articles about topics which were issues brought up. I guess sampling caught my drunken eye, and I just ran with it, because Ephraim called me a hypocrite lol. But yeah, so that is how that happened. I still agree with what I wrote drunk tho. And the idea of door by door head count is ridiculous. Not only is it insufficient, but it costs us billions. Sampling is used in countless other areas of CB and the government, including issuing out the dough. Unfortunately, their are mixed feelings for it, some think its unconstitutional and some think its still too inaccurate.
referring to what’s in bold:
Homeless are still citizens. And so are deadbeats. Whats your point? I assume it’s that homeless and deadbeats all voted for Obama. And that is somehow bad or funny? Typical republican snobbishness.