Ephraim said:
So, your justification for hypocracy is that you are honest about it?
I guess republicans don’t connect dots. I would be happy to have democrats run it. I wouldn’t be if a republican would. That isn’t hypocritical. Why? because the agenda of a democrat is more inline with my beliefs, while that of a republican is not. No *edited* I wouldn’t be okay with Karl Rove supervising the CB, just like you republicans aren’t okay with a democrat running things. I vote for people who I think will uphold my beliefs, and by voting for them, I put faith in their decisions. I didn’t vote for Bush or Karl Rove so I wouldn’t be okay with them doing anything.
and you totally avoided my point. You know, Sampling? Typical republican peddling over little things like scandals, name-calling, and “pseudo-hypocrisies”. The fact is any kind of real change made by a Karl Rove supervised CB would be far less beneficial to the accuracy of a Census. Sampling, would make the numbers a bit more accurate, seeing how the census is miscalculated in upwards of 4 to 6 million people. That’s 6 million people not accounted for, the majority falling under low-middle class status. The only people in favor for that kind policy change would be the democrats. Which is why if CB is to be supervised, I would be in favor for a Democrat to supervise it rather than a republican (who are against any sort of sampling). Now again, how is that hypocritical?