Reply To: i’m back

#70552

well he’s right… I actually had to time machine my way back here… Though i’ll tell you one thing, florence nightengale is one fine piece of *edited*…. 1838, a fresh 18 year old flo (that’s what we called her), mmmm mmmm, doesn’t get much prettier. And god who doesn’t love corsets, skinny waists and boobs pushed up to the necks. Man i shoulda stayed in the 19th century.