Nebs said:
Oh, OK. As for the firing of Mark Dybul, it was done because he was pushing to use as much of the money as possible for abstinence only programs, so it seems to be a policy difference that got him fired. Plus, It’s not like someone else can’t do the job inline with the new policy. At the very least it doesn’t seem to be arbitrary.
yes but he was fired with no successor lined up. That is not how you run government agencies. Especially not ones that save millions of lives.