Home › Forum Archive › Game Server Discussion › Counter-Strike: Source Discussion › End of term review › Reply To: End of term review
Ex said:
A time lemit need to be set for demos to be reviewed by the cls and i go along with the others no cl or exec should be able to ban without a demo . Reason i say this is its to easy for a cl or exec to just get *edited*ed or not like a person in the server and be able to ban a person in the servers with out proof if the admins have to have it every one should . As the execs and cls are a type of admin
And like the other people that posted this, IT IS NOT MASTERP’s CHOICE ON THIS MATTER…the ability to do this was already in place before MasterP did this. And what is the point in electing people if you do not trust them to do the right thing. It is exactly what we do with our very own government, we elect 1 person for the top, then a few below him, and so on, with people in place to keep things in check…Bitey was the top, MasterP was two-ish below and his checks and balances were Bitey/Liam and the other execs…
Now onto MasterP, my only issue was your slight hiatus, maybe I missed it, but a headsup would have been helpful, although it was the holidays…so maybe understandable : P
And like Lemm or whoever said, the smurfing is necessary at times, but we NEVER saw you on…and the people like to see who runs things every now and then. Just like in our own government, we need to see our president make speeches ect. so we know he is up and doing work for us(hopefully). Anyways…good new map rotation, I lub it(not you though since you took out havananananana) and it seems to be doing very well…
kthxbai