Reply To: Lawlrences Thread

#68936
MasterP
Spectator

rainefardreamer said:

so it’s being discussed?

that’s cool. so what do you discuss? whether you think the guy is hacking? i would think that a discussion would be most useful if there was something for them to look at. Memory, at least mine, isn’t really good enough and carries individual bias from perception.

 

but whatever, it’s in the super-secret executive level so it’s not like us grunt admins who haven’t grinded enough to level up, or can’t due to regulations achieve a position in the executive level

In the absence of a demo, other things such as his record on the server and prior bans are taken into consideration along with how they feel his gameplay was when they played him last. Believe it or not, every exec that’s voted so far has played with Lawlrence (except major, idk about him). You also have to consider the fact that this is not his first time being on the chopping block. Considering this is the fourth time he has been banned, yeah I think it’s safe to say the executive staff is familiar with him and what he brings to the server.

 

It’s “super secret” because it’s a discussion and vote amoung the executive staff. This is exactly what Lawlrence asked for when appealed the ban to the executive staff.

 

Soon regular admins will start getting perks for doing a good job but beyond that there’s nothing more you can do. None of the executive staff in office now created that rule. Also, it’s hard enough having executive members living off campus, there’s no way it would work it they lived hours away.

 

 

Lemm said:

I’m not defending lawlrence, because making direct attacks on execs is not the smartest thing to do… even if you do have a point however big or small it is.

 

It’s important for people to know that they should PM Master P if they have a problem. This saves a whole lot of bureaucratic bs because he is actually a nice guy.

Feel free to defend him without fear of punishment or censorship, that’s not how we run the club. It’s quite possible to defend someone and not flame someone else while doing it, it’s just that no one has figured out how to in this thread so far.

 

I’m not some evil, maniacal, scheming, smacktard. Anyone who knows me or has played with me for longer an hour knows that bolded statement is true.