This is what I get from this:
1. lawlrence has been in trouble in the past for mic spamming and has already had words with execs.. this means that both him and the execs are already hating each other.
2. this also means that lawlrence has been in trouble before
3. lawlrence did derail the thread.
4. It was right to move the thread
5. It was wrong to rename it in such a demeaning way.
6. lawlrence does show a lack of respect for select admins.
7. Master P cannot help rules that are already in place.
8. Even though there are checks and balances they don’t seem to be that balanced in this example.
I’m not defending lawlrence, because making direct attacks on execs is not the smartest thing to do… even if you do have a point however big or small it is.
It’s important for people to know that they should PM Master P if they have a problem. This saves a whole lot of bureaucratic bs because he is actually a nice guy.
Also, we could be a bit more mature than taunting people with such a thread name.